feat: decompose composite unknowns before questioning
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1146,10 +1146,10 @@ describe("applyValidatedProposal", () => {
|
||||
comparabilityUnknownId,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.nodeId).toBe(result.newActiveUnknownNodeId);
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.question).toMatch(
|
||||
/^What changed during that period that could help explain why /,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.question).not.toContain("same basis");
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion).toMatchObject({
|
||||
nodeId: result.newActiveUnknownNodeId,
|
||||
question: "What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.question.toLowerCase()).not.toMatch(
|
||||
/dso|debtor days|receivables turnover|working capital|receivables/,
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -1224,12 +1224,97 @@ describe("applyValidatedProposal", () => {
|
||||
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(result.emergentReasoningNodeCreated).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(result.emergentReasoningNodeId).toBe("n-existing-explanation");
|
||||
expect(result.newActiveUnknownNodeId).toBe("n-existing-explanation");
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.nodeId).toBe("n-existing-explanation");
|
||||
expect(result.newActiveUnknownNodeId).not.toBe("n-existing-explanation");
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.nodeId).not.toBe("n-existing-explanation");
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.question).toBe(
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
result.updatedSituationGraph.nodes.filter(
|
||||
(node) => node.label === graph.nodes.at(-1).label,
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("decomposes a composite selected unknown before asking the next question", () => {
|
||||
const { graph, proposal } = makeComparabilityUpdateFixture();
|
||||
|
||||
const result = applyValidatedProposal({
|
||||
situationGraph: graph,
|
||||
proposal,
|
||||
previousQuestion:
|
||||
"Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
|
||||
answer:
|
||||
"Yes. Both figures cover the same accounting period and are taken from the same management accounts.",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.success).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(result.atomicityAssessment).toBe("composite");
|
||||
expect(result.decompositionPerformed).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(result.childUnknownCount).toBe(5);
|
||||
expect(result.childNodeIds).toHaveLength(5);
|
||||
expect(result.atomicityReason).toContain("Decomposed");
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.nodeId).toBe(result.newActiveUnknownNodeId);
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.nodeId).not.toBe(
|
||||
result.emergentReasoningNodeId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(result.selectedQuestion?.question.toLowerCase()).not.toMatch(
|
||||
/dso|working capital|receivables|capex/,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const parentNode = result.updatedSituationGraph.nodes.find(
|
||||
(node) => node.id === result.emergentReasoningNodeId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(parentNode?.status).toBe("unknown");
|
||||
|
||||
const childNodes = result.updatedSituationGraph.nodes.filter((node) =>
|
||||
result.childNodeIds.includes(node.id),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(childNodes).toHaveLength(5);
|
||||
expect(childNodes.every((node) => node.parentId === parentNode.id)).toBe(
|
||||
true,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
result.updatedSituationGraph.edges.filter(
|
||||
(edge) =>
|
||||
result.childNodeIds.includes(edge.fromNodeId) &&
|
||||
edge.toNodeId === parentNode.id &&
|
||||
edge.relationship === "depends_on",
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toHaveLength(5);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("reuses existing decomposition children instead of duplicating them", () => {
|
||||
const { graph, proposal } = makeComparabilityUpdateFixture();
|
||||
|
||||
const firstResult = applyValidatedProposal({
|
||||
situationGraph: graph,
|
||||
proposal,
|
||||
previousQuestion:
|
||||
"Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
|
||||
answer:
|
||||
"Yes. Both figures cover the same accounting period and are taken from the same management accounts.",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(firstResult.success).toBe(true);
|
||||
|
||||
const secondResult = applyValidatedProposal({
|
||||
situationGraph: graph,
|
||||
proposal,
|
||||
previousQuestion:
|
||||
"Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
|
||||
answer:
|
||||
"Yes. Both figures cover the same accounting period and are taken from the same management accounts.",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(secondResult.success).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(secondResult.atomicityAssessment).toBe("composite");
|
||||
const uniqueChildIds = new Set(firstResult.childNodeIds);
|
||||
expect(uniqueChildIds.size).toBe(firstResult.childNodeIds.length);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
secondResult.updatedSituationGraph.nodes.filter((node) =>
|
||||
firstResult.childNodeIds.includes(node.id),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toHaveLength(firstResult.childNodeIds.length);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user