test(experiment): checkpoint granular answer fragment result

2026-08-19 14:41:57 +01:00
parent fbeaf01f90
commit 0b0d5594fe
3 changed files with 170 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "apparatus": "rto-granular-answer-fragments.mjs",
+  "experiment": "RTO.18A",
+  "turn": 1,
+  "artifactType": "LIVE RESULT — Turn 1 independent granular fragment",
+  "modelName": "qwen-claude:latest",
+  "elapsedMs": 37030,
+  "inputCharacterCount": 1670,
+  "centralCaseStatementSupplied": false,
+  "priorFragmentsSupplied": false,
+  "turnHistorySupplied": false,
+  "wholeSituationGraphSupplied": false,
+  "globalSelectorContextSupplied": false,
+  "question": "What evidence would clarify whether competitors are actively developing similar products and how soon they might release them?",
+  "answer": "The product has significant patents, proprietary processes and software algorithms that are not available to competitors.",
+  "structuredResult": {
+    "targetNodeId": "nxmeiab",
+    "observations": [
+      "The product possesses significant patents.",
+      "The product includes proprietary processes.",
+      "The product contains software algorithms that are not available to competitors."
+    ],
+    "uncertainties": [
+      "Competitors may have developed or can develop non-infringing alternatives or workarounds that do not rely on the listed assets.",
+      "The specific scope, strength, and enforceability of the significant patents regarding potential competitor activities are not defined.",
+      "While a barrier is implied by the unavailability of assets, no explicit timeline for potential competitor release (e.g., significantly delayed vs. effectively blocked) is provided."
+    ],
+    "assumptions": [
+      "That the stated unavailability of patents, processes, and algorithms constitutes an effective barrier that prevents or severely hinders competitors from developing similar products.",
+      "That competitors cannot legally circumvent the patents or technically reverse-engineer the proprietary assets despite their potential availability through other means."
+    ],
+    "relationships": [
+      {
+        "from": "Product",
+        "to": "Significant patents",
+        "type": "holds protection",
+        "rationale": "The answer explicitly states the product has significant patents."
+      },
+      {
+        "from": "Product",
+        "to": "Proprietary processes",
+        "type": "contains attribute",
+        "rationale": "The answer lists proprietary processes as characteristics of the product."
+      },
+      {
+        "from": "Software algorithms",
+        "to": "Competitors",
+        "type": "unavailable to",
+        "rationale": "The answer states software algorithms are not available to competitors."
+      }
+    ],
+    "possibleFollowUpQuestions": [
+      "Do the significant patents cover the core functionality required to build a competing product, or only peripheral implementation details?",
+      "Can competitors achieve equivalent results using different algorithms or processes that do not infringe on the stated protections?",
+      "What is the expiration timeline and geographic jurisdiction coverage of the significant patents mentioned?"
+    ]
+  }
+}