feat: introduce comparability assessment before contradiction reasoning
This commit is contained in:
+164
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
|
||||
import { makeEdge, makeGraph, makeNode } from "@/lib/graph/schema.js";
|
||||
|
||||
function buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key,
|
||||
scenario,
|
||||
observationLabels,
|
||||
contradictionLabel,
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus,
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion,
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
const summary = makeNode({
|
||||
id: `${key}-summary`,
|
||||
label: scenario,
|
||||
description: "Summary of the situation from the scenario text",
|
||||
kind: "state",
|
||||
status: "provisional",
|
||||
confidence: "medium",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const observations = observationLabels.map((label, index) =>
|
||||
makeNode({
|
||||
id: `${key}-obs-${index + 1}`,
|
||||
label,
|
||||
description: label,
|
||||
kind: "observation",
|
||||
status: "supported",
|
||||
confidence: "high",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const contradiction = contradictionLabel
|
||||
? [
|
||||
makeNode({
|
||||
id: `${key}-contradiction`,
|
||||
label: contradictionLabel,
|
||||
description: contradictionLabel,
|
||||
kind: "relationship",
|
||||
status: "supported",
|
||||
confidence: "medium",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
]
|
||||
: [];
|
||||
|
||||
const unknowns = [
|
||||
makeNode({
|
||||
id: `${key}-unknown-a`,
|
||||
label: "Possible explanation from one side of the situation.",
|
||||
description: "Possible explanation from one side of the situation.",
|
||||
kind: "unknown",
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
confidence: "high",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
makeNode({
|
||||
id: `${key}-unknown-b`,
|
||||
label: "Possible explanation from another side of the situation.",
|
||||
description: "Possible explanation from another side of the situation.",
|
||||
kind: "unknown",
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
confidence: "high",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
const edges = [
|
||||
...observations.map((node) =>
|
||||
makeEdge({
|
||||
id: `${node.id}-supports-summary`,
|
||||
fromNodeId: node.id,
|
||||
toNodeId: summary.id,
|
||||
relationship: "supports",
|
||||
description: `${node.label} supports the summary.`,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
),
|
||||
...unknowns.map((node) =>
|
||||
makeEdge({
|
||||
id: `${node.id}-depends-summary`,
|
||||
fromNodeId: node.id,
|
||||
toNodeId: summary.id,
|
||||
relationship: "depends_on",
|
||||
description: `${node.label} is an unresolved factor for this situation.`,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
key,
|
||||
scenario,
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus,
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion,
|
||||
graph: makeGraph({
|
||||
centralStatement: scenario,
|
||||
nodes: [summary, ...observations, ...contradiction, ...unknowns],
|
||||
edges,
|
||||
activeUnknownNodeId: null,
|
||||
resolvedNodeIds: [],
|
||||
currentSummary: `Comparability fixture for ${key}`,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export const comparabilityAssessmentFixtures = [
|
||||
buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key: "revenue-cash",
|
||||
scenario:
|
||||
"Revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period.",
|
||||
observationLabels: [
|
||||
"Revenue increased by 18%.",
|
||||
"Cash in the bank decreased over the same period.",
|
||||
],
|
||||
contradictionLabel:
|
||||
"Contradiction between revenue improvement and lower cash reserves.",
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus: "uncertain",
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion: true,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key: "complaints-production",
|
||||
scenario: "Complaints increased. Production increased.",
|
||||
observationLabels: ["Complaints increased.", "Production increased."],
|
||||
contradictionLabel:
|
||||
"Possible contradiction between complaints and production movement.",
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus: "uncertain",
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion: true,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key: "delivery-cancellations",
|
||||
scenario:
|
||||
"Average delivery time decreased by 25%, but order cancellations increased.",
|
||||
observationLabels: [
|
||||
"Average delivery time decreased by 25%.",
|
||||
"Order cancellations increased.",
|
||||
],
|
||||
contradictionLabel:
|
||||
"Contradiction between faster delivery and more cancellations.",
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus: "uncertain",
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion: true,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key: "satisfaction-complaints",
|
||||
scenario: "Customer satisfaction increased, but complaints increased.",
|
||||
observationLabels: [
|
||||
"Customer satisfaction increased.",
|
||||
"Complaints increased.",
|
||||
],
|
||||
contradictionLabel:
|
||||
"Contradiction between satisfaction improvement and more complaints.",
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus: "uncertain",
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion: true,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key: "temperature-ice",
|
||||
scenario: "Temperature increased. Ice melted.",
|
||||
observationLabels: ["Temperature increased.", "Ice melted."],
|
||||
contradictionLabel: null,
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus: "confirmed",
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion: false,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
buildComparabilityFixture({
|
||||
key: "sales-same",
|
||||
scenario: "Sales doubled. Sales doubled.",
|
||||
observationLabels: ["Sales doubled.", "Sales doubled."],
|
||||
contradictionLabel: null,
|
||||
expectedComparabilityStatus: "confirmed",
|
||||
expectsComparisonQuestion: false,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user