feat: introduce comparability assessment before contradiction reasoning

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-02 16:28:11 +01:00
parent b84989b96a
commit 0c7558d31f
5 changed files with 399 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import {
assessComparability,
formulateTieResolutionQuestion,
} from "@/lib/graph/question-formulator.js";
import { explainUnknownSelection } from "@/lib/graph/utils.js";
import { comparabilityAssessmentFixtures } from "@/tests/fixtures/comparability-assessment.js";
describe("comparability assessment", () => {
it("generates comparison questions only when comparability is uncertain", () => {
const summary = comparabilityAssessmentFixtures.map((fixture) => {
const assessment = assessComparability(fixture.graph);
const question = formulateTieResolutionQuestion({ graph: fixture.graph });
const ambiguity = explainUnknownSelection(fixture.graph, []);
expect(assessment.comparabilityStatus).toBe(
fixture.expectedComparabilityStatus,
);
expect(question.comparabilityStatus).toBe(
fixture.expectedComparabilityStatus,
);
if (fixture.expectsComparisonQuestion) {
expect(question.question.toLowerCase()).toContain("same");
expect(question.contradictionReasoningAllowed).toBe(false);
} else {
expect(question.question.toLowerCase()).not.toContain(
"same period and at the same scale",
);
}
if (fixture.key !== "sales-same") {
expect(ambiguity.status).toBe("ambiguous");
}
return {
scenario: fixture.scenario,
comparabilityStatus: assessment.comparabilityStatus,
contradictionReasoningAllowed: assessment.contradictionReasoningAllowed,
question: question.question,
};
});
expect(summary).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
[
{
"comparabilityStatus": "uncertain",
"contradictionReasoningAllowed": false,
"question": "Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
"scenario": "Revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period.",
},
{
"comparabilityStatus": "uncertain",
"contradictionReasoningAllowed": false,
"question": "Were these figures measured over the same period and at the same scale?",
"scenario": "Complaints increased. Production increased.",
},
{
"comparabilityStatus": "uncertain",
"contradictionReasoningAllowed": false,
"question": "Were these figures measured over the same period and at the same scale?",
"scenario": "Average delivery time decreased by 25%, but order cancellations increased.",
},
{
"comparabilityStatus": "uncertain",
"contradictionReasoningAllowed": false,
"question": "Were these figures measured over the same period and at the same scale?",
"scenario": "Customer satisfaction increased, but complaints increased.",
},
{
"comparabilityStatus": "confirmed",
"contradictionReasoningAllowed": true,
"question": "What changed during the period that could explain why Temperature increased. Ice melted?",
"scenario": "Temperature increased. Ice melted.",
},
{
"comparabilityStatus": "confirmed",
"contradictionReasoningAllowed": false,
"question": "What changed during the period that could explain why Sales doubled. Sales doubled?",
"scenario": "Sales doubled. Sales doubled.",
},
]
`);
});
});
+5 -1
View File
@@ -253,14 +253,18 @@ describe("lib/graph/orchestrator startCase", () => {
id: "q_tie_resolution",
selectionStatus: "ambiguous",
question:
"What changed during the period that could explain why Revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
"Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
tiedCandidateIds: expect.arrayContaining([expect.any(String)]),
comparabilityStatus: "uncertain",
contradictionReasoningAllowed: false,
});
expect(result.diagnostics.unknownSelectionExplanation).toMatchObject({
status: "ambiguous",
tieType: "complete_unresolved_tie",
selectedNodeId: null,
alphabeticalUsedAsReasoning: false,
tieResolutionQuestion:
"Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
});
});