experiment: separate source support from interpretation additions
This commit is contained in:
@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ Answer before continuing:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Created by Experiment 34. Updated by Experiments 38–53, 54A–54I. Branch: `feature/user-workspace-ux-v0.7`.*
|
||||
*Created by Experiment 34. Updated by Experiments 38–53, 54A–54J. Branch: `feature/user-workspace-ux-v0.7`.*
|
||||
|
||||
### Return-to-Work Note (Experiment 54I)
|
||||
### Return-to-Work Note (Experiment 54J)
|
||||
|
||||
Experiment 54H established deterministic identity for exact user input via SHA-256 hashing of verbatim text before any LLM interpretation. Experiment 54I tested whether two different interpretations of the same raw source can remain linked to that source while staying separately identifiable — neither was chosen as the winner; no production code changed. Both retained shared source lineage and remained independently deterministically referenceable. Interpretation quality, correctness, and downstream-question effects remain untested. Branch: `feature/user-workspace-ux-v0.7`. First file to inspect when resuming: `tests/reconstruction/source-interpretation-lineage.test.js`.
|
||||
Experiment 54I showed multiple interpretations can share one deterministic source lineage; Experiment 54J tested whether each interpretation can separately expose what is source-supported versus added by interpretation using a fixed grounding-record shape. Both branches stayed traceable to the same source while remaining distinct in their reported additions. No interpretation was selected as better and no numeric scoring occurred. Automated grounding and downstream-question effects remain untested. No production code or schemas changed. Branch: `feature/user-workspace-ux-v0.7`. First file to inspect when resuming: `tests/reconstruction/interpretation-source-grounding.test.js`.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user