experiment: validate selected-question contract live
This commit is contained in:
@@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ Two-turn run (fixed scenario: "We are considering relocating the engineering tea
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiment 57J.60 — Selected-Question Contract Live Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective:** Validate that v0.22's mandatory selectedQuestion rule (rule #16) works live when the model adds a new dedicated savings-realism unknown. **Classification: A — V0.22 FIX WORKS LIVE.** One start + one update through the production `updateCase()` path. Update 1 added one dedicated unknown node (`n_proj_savings_realism`, kind=unknown, status=unknown) and included a valid selectedQuestion candidate (nodeId=`n_proj_savings_realism`) referencing that same unresolved node. The old 57J.57 contract rejection — new unresolved unknown + selectedQuestion=null — did not recur. HTTP 200 at `update_applied`, no `proposal_compatibility` error, no rejectedProposalSnapshot. Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed. Full record in `docs/experiment-57j60.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiment 57E — Irrelevant Decomposition Question Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective:** Identify the exact graph node that triggered the decomposition producing "How the two observations were measured", and determine whether the parent was genuinely about comparison/measurement/timing before decomposition.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user