diff --git a/docs/current-handoff.md b/docs/current-handoff.md
index 34c05fd..b1b1c91 100644
--- a/docs/current-handoff.md
+++ b/docs/current-handoff.md
@@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ Experiment 54N tested whether an interpretation disagreement can be judged for m
   - `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (39/39)
 - **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.29 `Uncertainty over whether...` customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path on this branch.
 
+### 60B.33 explicit bare `whether` proposition fix
+
+- 60B.32 diagnosed that proposition extraction for a bare `Whether...` description still depended on label keywords like `status|likelihood|risk|uncertainty`, causing nominal labels such as `Enterprise customer signing decision` to lose their explicit proposition.
+- `extractMeaning()` now treats a description beginning with bare `Whether...` as sufficient evidence of an unresolved proposition regardless of label wording, while preserving the existing bounded rationale stripping.
+- Focused deterministic verification passed:
+  - `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (42/42)
+- Generic non-proposition decision unknowns remain on their existing path when no explicit `Whether...` proposition is present.
+- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.31 live-shaped customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path on this branch.
+
 ### When This Knowledge-Management Phase Is Complete
 
 Provisional criteria for review (all confirmed met by Experiment 38 cold-start test):
diff --git a/docs/experiment-60b33.md b/docs/experiment-60b33.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f9bb4a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/experiment-60b33.md
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+# Experiment 60B.33 — Honor Explicit Bare `Whether...` Propositions
+
+**Branch:** `feature/bare-whether-proposition-v0.33`  
+**Starting HEAD:** `29d565372b68fd286d797b18b19864778d517d03`  
+**Date:** 2026-08-14  
+**Status:** COMPLETE
+
+## Objective
+
+Close the narrow gap diagnosed in 60B.32 by making an explicit bare `Whether...` description sufficient evidence of an unresolved proposition even when the label is nominal and lacks status/likelihood/risk keywords.
+
+## 60B.32 Diagnosis
+
+The previous bounded proposition path still required label keywords such as:
+
+```text
+status
+likelihood
+probability
+chance
+risk
+uncertainty
+```
+
+before honoring a bare `Whether...` description.
+
+That meant a live-shaped node like:
+
+```text
+label:
+Enterprise customer signing decision
+
+description:
+Whether the prospective enterprise customer will commit this year, because resolving this uncertainty is needed to decide if launching this year provides superior net value over waiting twelve months.
+```
+
+failed to preserve its explicit proposition even though the description itself already stated one.
+
+## Exact Deterministic Change
+
+Production change was limited to `lib/graph/question-formulator.js`.
+
+Inside `extractMeaning()`, the bounded proposition-extraction gate now treats a description beginning with:
+
+```text
+Whether ...
+```
+
+as sufficient for proposition extraction regardless of label wording.
+
+This preserves the existing label-keyword path, but adds the narrower rule:
+
+```text
+if description explicitly starts with bare Whether...
+→ extract whether-proposition directly
+```
+
+using the same existing rationale stripping boundary.
+
+## Exact 60B.31 Regression
+
+For the live-shaped node:
+
+```text
+label:
+Enterprise customer signing decision
+
+description:
+Whether the prospective enterprise customer will commit this year, because resolving this uncertainty is needed to decide if launching this year provides superior net value over waiting twelve months.
+```
+
+the deterministic final question is now:
+
+```text
+What evidence would clarify whether the prospective enterprise customer will commit this year?
+```
+
+The final question excludes:
+
+- `launching`
+- `superior net value`
+- `waiting twelve months`
+- `because`
+
+and the source node description remains unchanged.
+
+## Focused Verification
+
+Run exactly as bounded:
+
+```bash
+npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js
+```
+
+Result:
+
+```text
+PASS — 42/42 tests
+```
+
+Focused coverage confirms:
+
+- exact 60B.31 live-shaped regression passes
+- bare `Whether...` works with an unrelated nominal label (`Supplier contract decision`)
+- bare `Whether...` with a status-like label remains unchanged
+- all prefix regressions from 60B.28/60B.30 remain green
+- direct interrogatives remain unchanged
+- a generic non-proposition decision unknown remains on its existing non-proposition path
+- source descriptions remain intact
+
+## Preserved Existing Paths
+
+This change did **not**:
+
+- change decision-threshold precedence globally
+- change question-target selection
+- change graph structure, materiality, schema, provider, or harness behaviour
+- add domain-specific wording
+- regress `Unknown whether...`, `Uncertain whether...`, `Uncertainty about whether...`, `Uncertainty regarding whether...`, or `Uncertainty over whether...`
+
+## What Remains Unproven
+
+The exact live 60B.31 rerun on this branch remains unproven. This experiment guarantees the deterministic formulation boundary only.