experiment: validate uncertainty proposition coverage live
This commit is contained in:
@@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ Experiment 54N tested whether an interpretation disagreement can be judged for m
|
||||
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (37/37)
|
||||
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.27 customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path.
|
||||
|
||||
### 60B.29 live uncertainty proposition coverage check
|
||||
|
||||
- A single live rerun was executed on `tests/fixtures/pre-anchored-product-launch-options.json` using the exact 60B.27-style customer-signing answer and the committed update-only harness.
|
||||
- Core reasoning chain remained preserved live: decision stayed unresolved, customer-signing factor survived as a first-class unknown, material target remained selected, and no unrelated uncertainty was invented.
|
||||
- The live customer node description used `Uncertainty over whether...` — **not** `Unknown whether...` or `Uncertain whether...` — so the new 60B.28 prefix-extension path was **not** exercised live.
|
||||
- Final question regressed to generic wording (`What outcome would demonstrate enough value to justify launching?`) despite `selectedQuestion.nodeId` remaining the customer-signing node; full proposition preservation therefore remains unproven live.
|
||||
- Rationale contamination remained absent.
|
||||
|
||||
### When This Knowledge-Management Phase Is Complete
|
||||
|
||||
Provisional criteria for review (all confirmed met by Experiment 38 cold-start test):
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user