docs: preserve Confidence Engine methodology continuity
This commit is contained in:
+32
-2
@@ -139,6 +139,36 @@ Recent work is preserved as valuable experimental learning. The graph/reconstruc
|
||||
|
||||
The next phase starts from the workspace/methodology question, not from a preselected technical solution.
|
||||
|
||||
See:
|
||||
### Required methodology-continuity context (read first)
|
||||
|
||||
> **Before continuing any Confidence Engine reasoning development, load this document:**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> `docs/Confidence_Engine_Return_to_Origin_Methodology_Context_2026-08-18.md`
|
||||
|
||||
This is the durable methodology anchor. It covers:
|
||||
- What Confidence Engine is (reasoning method, not software or LLM)
|
||||
- What it is not
|
||||
- The granular answer-fragment hypothesis (working — not architecture)
|
||||
- RTO.14–17 learning and why they did not define the next architecture
|
||||
- The memory/graph separation principle
|
||||
- Optional capability: "Help me answer" / "Answer for me"
|
||||
- Methodology test for future development
|
||||
|
||||
**Do not begin reasoning development from the latest experiment apparatus.** Always load this methodology continuity context first. Without it, a new session will reconstruct the project from recent technical experiments and lose sight of the method the application is meant to embody.
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Git checkpoint
|
||||
|
||||
- **Branch:** `feature/decision-closure-ownership-v0.47`
|
||||
- **HEAD:** `e1b54e407389c7f1c25ba20645540d404b9e9df9`
|
||||
- **Latest commit:** `e1b54e4 test(experiment): checkpoint granular answer fragment apparatus`
|
||||
|
||||
### Status of RTO.14–17
|
||||
|
||||
RTO.14–17 experiments proved that an LLM can retain focused knowledge and carry coherent reasoning across turns inside a single investigation. This was valuable evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
**However, they also revealed that the cumulative reconstruction pattern was reproduced at a lower scope.** Do not treat RTO.14–17 as the automatic architecture direction to continue. The next reasoning direction is the granular answer-fragment hypothesis: independent user-chosen question/answer deconstruction without accumulated focused state being passed between LLM calls.
|
||||
|
||||
**Prohibition:** Do not automatically continue into cumulative-state compression or fourth-turn experiments without first revisiting the methodology continuity document above.
|
||||
|
||||
See also:
|
||||
- `docs/methodology-checkpoint-return-to-origin.md` — repository-facing checkpoint summary
|
||||
- `docs/Confidence_Engine_Return_to_Origin_Methodology_Context_2026-08-18.md` — full methodology context (source)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user