experiment: test decision sufficiency on option graph
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2652,3 +2652,9 @@ Vitest run: NO
|
||||
Ollama calls: 1
|
||||
Direct API calls: 0
|
||||
Dev server disturbed: NO
|
||||
|
||||
## Experiment 60B.1 — Decision Sufficiency Recognition (2026-08-13)
|
||||
|
||||
Tested whether the engine resolves the existing "Which option leaves us better off overall?" decision when both options have quantified financial impacts and the user states no other material differences remain. Fixed answer provided: £600k one-off relocation disruption cost versus £2m/year recurring stay-put cost, with explicit closure condition ("no other material differences").
|
||||
|
||||
**Result:** Classification A — Decision Sufficiency Recognised. The engine preserved all three existing entity identities (opt_relocate, opt_stay_put, n_relocation_decision), created first-class metric nodes for both costs with correct option ownership and units (GBP vs GBP/year), recognised sufficient evidence to close the decision context, resolved n_relocation_decision in-place (status unknown → resolved) with direction favouring Relocate, created zero new uncertainties, and generated no follow-up question. One live call at qwen-claude:latest on http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user