diff --git a/lib/graph/apply-proposal.js b/lib/graph/apply-proposal.js
index fcfe266..d34728d 100644
--- a/lib/graph/apply-proposal.js
+++ b/lib/graph/apply-proposal.js
@@ -2804,6 +2804,16 @@ function proposalResolutionSummary(proposal) {
   return { resolved, proposalText };
 }
 
+function resolvedProposalMeaningText(proposal) {
+  return normaliseSemanticText(
+    (proposal.updatedNodes || [])
+      .filter((update) => update.newStatus === "resolved")
+      .map((update) => update.newValue)
+      .filter((value) => typeof value === "string" && value.trim().length > 0)
+      .join(" "),
+  );
+}
+
 function mentionsHardConstraint(text) {
   return (
     text.includes("hard constraint") ||
@@ -3040,13 +3050,18 @@ function validateAnswerMeaningAlignment(proposal) {
   }
 
   if (supportCategory === "other") {
+    const resolvedMeaningText = resolvedProposalMeaningText(proposal);
+
     if (
       resolved &&
-      containsConstraintBoundaryLanguage(proposalText) &&
-      !containsConstraintBoundaryLanguage(meaningText)
+      resolvedMeaningText &&
+      !rawAnswerSupportsUnclassifiedMeaning(
+        proposal.answerMeaning.userSupportedMeaning,
+        resolvedMeaningText,
+      )
     ) {
       errors.push(
-        "Proposal cannot resolve beyond an unclassified answer by introducing an unsupported constraint or preference/trade-off distinction.",
+        "Proposal cannot resolve beyond an unclassified answer by introducing unsupported stronger meaning than answerMeaning.userSupportedMeaning establishes.",
       );
     }
   }
diff --git a/tests/graph/apply-proposal.test.js b/tests/graph/apply-proposal.test.js
index 5aa0d2d..d1afaf0 100644
--- a/tests/graph/apply-proposal.test.js
+++ b/tests/graph/apply-proposal.test.js
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ describe("applyValidatedProposal", () => {
     );
   });
 
-  it("57A regression: a legitimate decision-advancing answer classified as other may resolve its intended unknown", () => {
+  it("57F legitimate-answer regression: a grounded unclassified answer may resolve its intended unknown", () => {
     const graph = makeCommercialUpdateFixture();
     const parentId = graph.activeUnknownNodeId;
 
@@ -1640,6 +1640,49 @@ describe("applyValidatedProposal", () => {
     expect(result.stage).toBeUndefined();
   });
 
+  it("57F deterministic reproduction: pre-fix grounded unclassified answer would have been rejected by proposal-text constraint language", () => {
+    const graph = makeCommercialUpdateFixture();
+    const parentId = graph.activeUnknownNodeId;
+
+    const result = applyValidatedProposal({
+      situationGraph: graph,
+      answer:
+        "We're looking at this mainly for cost reduction — roughly £2M annual savings on office overhead.",
+      previousQuestion:
+        "What problem would this need to solve to justify continuing development?",
+      proposal: {
+        addedNodes: [],
+        updatedNodes: [
+          {
+            nodeId: parentId,
+            previousStatus: "unknown",
+            newStatus: "resolved",
+            previousValue: null,
+            newValue:
+              "Cost reduction, including approximately £2M annual office-overhead savings, is a stated reason for considering the relocation.",
+            reason:
+              "The answer establishes that cost reduction is the relevant preference/trade-off consideration for this decision.",
+          },
+        ],
+        addedEdges: [],
+        removedEdgeIds: [],
+        resolvedUnknownNodeIds: [parentId],
+        affectedNodeIds: [],
+        selectedQuestion: null,
+        answerMeaning: {
+          userSupportedMeaning:
+            "Cost reduction, including approximately £2M annual office-overhead savings, is a stated reason for considering the relocation.",
+          possibleInference: null,
+          supportCategory: "other",
+          resolutionGuidance: null,
+        },
+      },
+    });
+
+    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
+    expect(result.updatedSituationGraph.resolvedNodeIds).toContain(parentId);
+  });
+
   it("unsafe unclassified answer: other is not automatically trusted when the proposal adds stronger unsupported meaning", () => {
     const graph = makeCommercialUpdateFixture();
     const parentId = graph.activeUnknownNodeId;
@@ -1902,7 +1945,7 @@ describe("applyValidatedProposal", () => {
     expect(result.success).toBe(false);
     expect(result.stage).toBe("proposal_compatibility");
     expect(result.errors.join(" ")).toContain(
-      "unsupported constraint or preference/trade-off distinction",
+      "unsupported stronger meaning than answerMeaning.userSupportedMeaning establishes",
     );
   });