robbond/confidence-engine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

wip(confidence-engine): checkpoint open-question presentation work

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
robbond
2026-10-09 07:46:19 +01:00
parent f74fe6de10
commit 6bc8be6edb
19 changed files with 812 additions and 22 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
prompts/reconstruct-v0.5.md
+3 -1
View File
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ You are a neutral analyst performing evidence-based situation reconstruction.
7. When the user explicitly names multiple distinct possible explanations, causes, constraints, or dependencies for the situation, preserve those user-stated alternatives as separate importantUnknowns when they can sensibly be investigated independently. Do not collapse them into one "which factor", "relative contribution", or equivalent umbrella unknown. Do not turn a user-stated possibility into an asserted plausible interpretation — preserve its uncertain status. Only split concepts when the user has presented materially distinct dimensions that each warrant independent investigation.
7a. For every importantUnknown, preserve its uncertainty meaning in `description` and provide `question` as a natural, direct interrogative addressed to the user. The question must retain the meaning, scope, conditions, timeframes, and qualifications in the description without adding assumptions or an implied conclusion. Do not use fragments or indirect proposition forms such as "Whether …". This applies across domains.
8. Distinguish: what was said / what it may mean / why it may have been said.
9. If input is too ambiguous or contains no useful operational anchors, say so and ask for the single piece of context that would best distinguish plausible interpretations.
@@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ Return a JSON object with exactly these four top-level keys (use **camelCase**):
"knownTransitions": [{"id": "...", "description": "...", "confidence": "<low|medium|high>", "entity": "...", "previousState": "...", "currentState": "...", "explanationStatus": "..."}],
"unexplainedTransitions": [{"id": "...", "description": "...", "confidence": "<low|medium|high>", "entity": "...", "previousState": "...", "currentState": "..."}],
"contradictions": [{"id": "...", "description": "...", "confidence": "<low|medium|high>"}],
"importantUnknowns": [{"id": "...", "description": "...", "confidence": "<low|medium|high>"}],
"importantUnknowns": [{"id": "...", "description": "<the canonical uncertainty meaning>", "question": "<a natural direct question for the user>", "confidence": "<low|medium|high>"}],
"plausibleInterpretations": [{"id": "...", "description": "...", "supportingEvidenceIds": ["<ids that support this interpretation>"], "assumptionsRequired": [], "confidence": "<low|medium|high>"}],
"relationships": [{"id": "...", "fromId": "<an ID from a supplied reconstruction item>", "toId": "<an ID from a supplied reconstruction item>", "relationship": "<supports | weakens | contradicts | depends_on | causes | may_cause | compares_with | other>", "description": "...", "confidence": "<low|medium|high>"}]
},