experiment: test incremental meaning on existing uncertainty

2026-08-12 10:34:53 +01:00
parent ce01e70010
commit 70db093cb1
2 changed files with 98 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -175,6 +175,16 @@ _Created by Experiment 34. Updated by Experiments 38–53, 54A–54Z, 55A–55F,

 ---

+### Experiment 57J.80 — Incremental Meaning on Existing Uncertainty (PRE-ANCHORED)
+
+**Objective:** When a savings-realism uncertainty already exists and the user supplies new concrete information relevant to it, does the model emit `structuralActionRequired=true`, preserve that new information structurally, and avoid creating a duplicate equivalent uncertainty?
+
+**Classification: I — BLOCKED.** The committed `FIXTURE_MODE=updateOnly` apparatus passed a null `previousQuestion` through to the production server, which rejected at `request_validation` stage with `"Expected string, received null"`. The rejection occurred before any model inference call. One update call was made (counted but not executed by the model). No graph mutation, no structural action output, no information preservation assessment possible. The pre-anchored fixture and harness from 57J.78 remain correct for their original intent; this experiment encountered a boundary condition where no prior Start means no selectedQuestion to carry forward. Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed.
+
+---
+
+---
+
 ### Experiment 57J.53 — Structured Fidelity Multi-Turn Progress

 Tested whether the structured-fidelity path supports genuine investigation progress on Update 2 after Update 1 represented savings-realism uncertainty. **Classification: B — USEFUL PARTIAL PROGRESS.**
@@ -1508,3 +1518,9 @@ FIXTURE_MODE=updateOnly ANSWER_2="I am unsure whether the projected office savin
 ```

 This satisfies 57J.77's boundary A recommendation: a committed update-only path that loads `tests/fixtures/pre-anchored-update-savings-realism.json` and sends it as an Update request body without first running Start.
+
+---
+
+### Experiment 57J.80 — Incremental Meaning on Existing Uncertainty (PRE-ANCHORED)
+
+**Objective:** When a savings-realism uncertainty already exists and the user supplies new concrete information relevant to it, does the model emit `structuralActionRequired=true`, preserve that new information structurally, and avoid creating a duplicate equivalent uncertainty? **Classification: I — BLOCKED.** The committed `FIXTURE_MODE=updateOnly` apparatus passed a null `previousQuestion` through to the production server, which rejected at `request_validation` stage with `"Expected string, received null"`. The rejection occurred before any model inference call. One update call was made (counted but not executed by the model). No graph mutation, no structural action output, no information preservation assessment possible. The pre-anchored fixture and harness from 57J.78 remain correct for their original intent; this experiment encountered a boundary condition where no prior Start means no selectedQuestion to carry forward. Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed.