robbond/confidence-engine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

experiment: validate live financial investigation progression

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
robbond
2026-08-18 06:32:40 +01:00
parent a52f0345a1
commit 7dd4a956fb
2 changed files with 91 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/current-handoff.md
+11
View File
@@ -68,3 +68,14 @@ The live model selected nk6eyn2 ("exact monetary value of potential enterprise c
**What this establishes:** The live engine can produce an acceptable graph-backed question on a fresh product-launch start without requiring decomposition.
**What this does NOT prove:** Whether investigation ownership is preserved when a selected target's formulation is rejected (the core invariant from checkpoint 60B.93). The question-rejection boundary was not reached because the live model chose a different investigation target with an acceptable question path.
## Experiment 60B.97 result (2026-08-18)
**Classification: E — START PATH DIVERGED**
The live model again selected a non-financial-comparison target on the product-launch scenario. The Start selected enterprise-customer signing probability ("What evidence would clarify probability or likelihood that the enterprise customer will sign within the current launch window?") rather than the expected cash-flow / NPV comparison. Update 1 then hit a result_validation error: "Active unknown violates reasoning pattern consistency: \"n_fincomp12\" is explanation but active pattern is decision."
**What this establishes:** (1) The divergence from financial-comparison targets continues across multiple runs; (2) there exists an internal graph-state inconsistency (explanation-node vs decision-pattern mismatch in the Start/Update pipeline).
**What this does NOT prove:** Whether a financially-comparison-aligned Start would progress coherently with a financial answer, or whether the pattern consistency issue is deterministic.