From 7e18d0b53ffe79e6e1861cbcb4fe75f09f648caa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: robbond Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 13:03:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] experiment: align investigation response input --- .claude/ux-guidelines.md | 8 ++++++ components/reasoning-workspace.jsx | 2 +- docs/design-evolution-log.md | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.claude/ux-guidelines.md b/.claude/ux-guidelines.md index 3487b78..67b4546 100644 --- a/.claude/ux-guidelines.md +++ b/.claude/ux-guidelines.md @@ -385,3 +385,11 @@ Short inputs should feel valid. Users may still paste longer content when necessary. Meaning and state must never depend on colour alone. + +Similar interactions should look similar. + +Every investigation answer is a single observation. + +Response controls should communicate concise input unless the engine explicitly requests otherwise. + +Consistency reduces cognitive load. diff --git a/components/reasoning-workspace.jsx b/components/reasoning-workspace.jsx index 67868be..a5d7339 100644 --- a/components/reasoning-workspace.jsx +++ b/components/reasoning-workspace.jsx @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ export default function ReasoningWorkspace({ rows={4} disabled={updateStatus === "loading"} className="w-full rounded-lg border border-gray-300 px-4 py-3 text-sm focus:border-gray-500 focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-gray-400 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-60" - placeholder="Enter the answer to the selected question..." + placeholder="What do you know about this?" />
diff --git a/docs/design-evolution-log.md b/docs/design-evolution-log.md index 9a4659f..5d2b983 100644 --- a/docs/design-evolution-log.md +++ b/docs/design-evolution-log.md @@ -369,10 +369,52 @@ A smaller initial input will make beginning an investigation feel easier and wil Pending visual review. +#### Result + +Confirmed. + +Four visible rows better communicates a starting observation than six. + +Input size communicates expected effort. + +"What have you noticed?" reinforces observational thinking. + +Users are encouraged to begin rather than compose. + +The facilitator and workspace now feel more balanced. + +This interaction principle should continue throughout the investigation rather than existing only on the landing page. + +#### Decision + +Retain the smaller landing input. + +Proceed to investigate consistency between the landing experience and investigation responses. + +--- + +### Experiment 08 — Consistent Investigation Responses + +#### Hypothesis + +Every answer given during an investigation should feel like an observation, not a report. + +The response component should therefore communicate the same expected effort as the initial scenario input. + +#### Questions + +- Does a smaller response area reduce perceived effort? +- Does the investigation feel more conversational? +- Does consistency improve confidence? +- Does the workspace become visually calmer? +- Does the current investigation remain the dominant focus? + #### Status Experimental. +No conclusions yet. + --- ## Current Open Questions