robbond/confidence-engine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: record proposition question formulation fix

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
robbond
2026-08-13 17:45:28 +01:00
parent f955b875af
commit 802eb1cc16
2 changed files with 133 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/current-handoff.md
+10
View File
@@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ Experiment 54N tested whether an interpretation disagreement can be judged for m
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js tests/graph/question-formulation-v0.24.test.js` → PASS (45/45)
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.21 product-launch regression in the full end-to-end path.
### 60B.26 proposition question formulation fix
- 60B.25 diagnosed two deterministic causes of awkward proposition questions: whole-description extraction (including rationale) and treating `whether...` propositions as finished direct questions.
- `extractMeaning()` now performs bounded proposition extraction for nominal/status-like unknowns whose descriptions begin with `whether...`, stopping at clear rationale boundaries such as `;`, `, so that`, `, because`, and `matters because`.
- `whether...` is no longer treated as a direct interrogative for question framing; it now uses the existing deterministic evidence phrasing (`What evidence would clarify whether X?`).
- Direct interrogatives and wh-questions remain preserved unchanged.
- Focused verification passed:
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (29/29)
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.24 regression through the full end-to-end runtime path.
### When This Knowledge-Management Phase Is Complete
Provisional criteria for review (all confirmed met by Experiment 38 cold-start test):