experiment: validate equivalent uncertainty identity live

2026-08-11 19:30:08 +01:00
parent 2927509ca5
commit 929486c354
2 changed files with 147 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -203,6 +203,12 @@ Two-turn run (fixed scenario: "We are considering relocating the engineering tea

 ---

+### Experiment 57J.61 — Equivalent Uncertainty Identity Live Test
+
+**Objective:** Once a dedicated savings-realism uncertainty exists, does a second semantically equivalent statement reuse that same unresolved node rather than create a duplicate? **Classification: D — UPDATE 1 FAILED.** One start + two updates. Start HTTP 200 (6 nodes). Update 1 returned HTTP 200 at update_applied but the harness crash prevented detailed proposal capture. A cold-start variant confirmed that when userSupportedMeaning is populated for savings-realism uncertainty, the model extracts meaning but proposes zero graph mutations — updatedNodes=[{nodeId: X, newValue: null}], addedNodes=[], addedEdges=[]. The gateway rejects this at proposal_compatibility with "answerMeaning.userSupportedMeaning is populated, but the proposal contains no graph mutation." Update 2 was reached (total 3 calls) and was rejected for the same reason. **Neither turn established a persistent savings-realism unknown.** The identity invariant cannot be tested when neither turn produces a valid, persistent unknown node. Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed. Full record in `docs/experiment-57j61.md`.
+
+---
+
 ### Experiment 57E — Irrelevant Decomposition Question Boundary

 **Objective:** Identify the exact graph node that triggered the decomposition producing "How the two observations were measured", and determine whether the parent was genuinely about comparison/measurement/timing before decomposition.