fix: resolve 500 errors from model returning trivial status objects (root cause + v0.2 prompt fix)
Two bugs were causing the model to return {"status":"ok"} / {"status":"ready"}
instead of structured reconstruction data, resulting in POST /api/analyse 500:
1. DOUBLE-WRAPPING BUG (lib/llm/provider.js):
generateReconstruction() called buildPrompt(scenario) on input that was
already a fully-built prompt string from analyseScenario(). This wrapped the
v0.1 prompt (~5000+ chars) in another template layer, producing incomprehensible
output that the model could not parse as structured JSON.
Fix: Pass scenario through directly (it is ALREADY a built prompt).
2. MISSING JSON SPEC (prompts/reconstruct-v0.2.md):
The v0.2 prompt template said 'matching the structure exactly' but never
defined what that structure was. The model invented its own field names
(input_classification, reasoning_mode, anchors) with snake_case instead of
camelCase, which failed Zod validation -> 500 errors.
Fix: Added explicit JSON schema section with exact key names, enum values,
and nested structure matching the Zod validation layer.
Additionally:
- Refactored route to use analyseScenario from lib/analysis (centralized)
- Added lib/analysis.js with shared analysis logic
- Updated components to display promptVersion and validation errors
- Added lib/reconstruction/prompt.js v0.1/v0.2 versioning
- Added lib/reconstruction/schema.js v0.2 Zod schemas
- Added debug tool scripts, evaluation results, and comparison findings
This commit is contained in:
+164
-13
@@ -1,38 +1,51 @@
|
||||
import { z } from "zod";
|
||||
|
||||
const confidenceEnum = z.enum(["low", "medium", "high"]);
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// Shared enums (v0.1 & v0.2)
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
const itemSchema = z.object({
|
||||
export const confidenceEnum = z.enum(["low", "medium", "high"]);
|
||||
const importanceEnum = z.enum(["incidental", "supporting", "important", "critical"]);
|
||||
const expectedInfoValueEnum = z.enum(["low", "medium", "high"]);
|
||||
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// v0.1 — extraction-only schema (preserved)
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
const confidenceEnumV1 = z.enum(["low", "medium", "high"]);
|
||||
|
||||
const itemSchemaV1 = z.object({
|
||||
id: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
description: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
confidence: confidenceEnum,
|
||||
confidence: confidenceEnumV1,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const reconstructionSchema = z.object({
|
||||
observations: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
observations: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
reportedClaims: z.array(
|
||||
itemSchema.extend({
|
||||
itemSchemaV1.extend({
|
||||
attributedTo: z.union([z.string().min(1), z.null()]).optional().nullable(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
),
|
||||
assumptions: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
entities: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
assumptions: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
entities: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
transitions: z.array(
|
||||
itemSchema.extend({
|
||||
itemSchemaV1.extend({
|
||||
entity: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
previousState: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
currentState: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
explanationStatus: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
})
|
||||
),
|
||||
expectedButMissing: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
presentButUnexpected: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
contradictions: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
openUncertainties: z.array(itemSchema),
|
||||
expectedButMissing: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
presentButUnexpected: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
contradictions: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
openUncertainties: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// v0.1 analyse response (used internally)
|
||||
export const analyseResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
reconstruction: reconstructionSchema,
|
||||
reconstruction: z.union([reconstructionSchema, z.null()]),
|
||||
modelName: z.string(),
|
||||
responseDurationMs: z.number(),
|
||||
validationStatus: z.enum(["valid", "partial", "invalid"]),
|
||||
@@ -48,6 +61,133 @@ export const healthResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
error: z.string().nullable(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// v0.2 — reasoning classification + reconstruction
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
export const inputTypes = /** @type {z.ZodType<typeof import("@/lib/reconstruction/schema").INPUT_TYPE_VALUE>} */ (
|
||||
z.enum([
|
||||
"observed_problem",
|
||||
"unexplained_change",
|
||||
"contradiction",
|
||||
"decision_request",
|
||||
"causal_claim",
|
||||
"reported_claim",
|
||||
"fault_report",
|
||||
"ambiguous_statement",
|
||||
"question",
|
||||
"desired_outcome",
|
||||
"insufficient_context",
|
||||
"other",
|
||||
])
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
export const reasoningModes = /** @type {z.ZodType<typeof import("@/lib/reconstruction/schema").REASONING_MODE_VALUE>} */ (
|
||||
z.enum([
|
||||
"establish_baseline",
|
||||
"identify_difference",
|
||||
"reconstruct_transition",
|
||||
"decompose_aggregate",
|
||||
"validate_measurement",
|
||||
"validate_claim",
|
||||
"investigate_contradiction",
|
||||
"clarify_meaning",
|
||||
"decision_support",
|
||||
"fault_investigation",
|
||||
"identify_missing_information",
|
||||
"test_possible_explanations",
|
||||
"other",
|
||||
])
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const evidenceRecordSchema = z.object({
|
||||
id: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
description: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
evidenceType: z.enum(["direct_observation", "reported_statement", "interpretation", "assumption", "inferred_relationship"]),
|
||||
source: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
attribution: z.string().nullable().optional(),
|
||||
confidence: confidenceEnum,
|
||||
importance: importanceEnum,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const reconstructionSchemaV2 = z.object({
|
||||
summary: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
actors: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
systemsOrObjects: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
expectedStates: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
observedStates: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
differences: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
knownTransitions: z.array(
|
||||
itemSchemaV1.extend({
|
||||
entity: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
previousState: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
currentState: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
explanationStatus: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
})
|
||||
),
|
||||
unexplainedTransitions: z.array(
|
||||
itemSchemaV1.extend({
|
||||
entity: z.string().min(1).optional(),
|
||||
previousState: z.string().min(1).optional(),
|
||||
currentState: z.string().min(1).optional(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
),
|
||||
contradictions: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
importantUnknowns: z.array(itemSchemaV1),
|
||||
plausibleInterpretations: z.array(
|
||||
z.object({
|
||||
id: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
description: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
supportingEvidenceIds: z.array(z.string()),
|
||||
assumptionsRequired: z.array(z.string()).optional().default([]),
|
||||
confidence: confidenceEnum,
|
||||
})
|
||||
),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const inputClassificationSchema = z.object({
|
||||
primaryType: inputTypes,
|
||||
secondaryTypes: z.array(inputTypes).optional().default([]),
|
||||
reasoningModes: z.array(reasoningModes).optional().default([]),
|
||||
classificationReason: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
confidence: confidenceEnum,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const nextQuestionSchema = z.object({
|
||||
id: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
question: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
targets: z.array(z.string()),
|
||||
reason: z.string().min(1),
|
||||
expectedInformationValue: expectedInfoValueEnum,
|
||||
reasoningMode: reasoningModes.optional().default("other"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// v0.2 complete analysis response (what the model produces)
|
||||
export const reconstructionV2Schema = z.object({
|
||||
inputClassification: inputClassificationSchema,
|
||||
reconstruction: reconstructionSchemaV2,
|
||||
evidence: z.array(evidenceRecordSchema),
|
||||
nextQuestion: nextQuestionSchema,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Outer wrapper for API return (includes diagnostics + v0.2 data)
|
||||
export const analyseResponseV2Schema = z.object({
|
||||
inputClassification: inputClassificationSchema.optional(),
|
||||
reconstruction: reconstructionSchemaV2.optional().nullable(),
|
||||
evidence: z.array(evidenceRecordSchema).optional(),
|
||||
nextQuestion: nextQuestionSchema.optional(),
|
||||
modelName: z.string(),
|
||||
responseDurationMs: z.number(),
|
||||
validationStatus: z.enum(["valid", "partial", "invalid"]),
|
||||
rawResponse: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
errors: z.array(z.string()).optional(),
|
||||
promptVersion: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// Parsing helpers
|
||||
// ──────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
export function parseReconstruction(raw) {
|
||||
if (typeof raw === "string") {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
@@ -58,3 +198,14 @@ export function parseReconstruction(raw) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
return reconstructionSchema.parse(raw);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function parseReconstructionV2(raw) {
|
||||
if (typeof raw === "string") {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
raw = JSON.parse(raw);
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
throw new SyntaxError("Model response is not valid JSON");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return reconstructionV2Schema.parse(raw);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user