From 9c715161b069251e2de531b6a7a77fe05a4db632 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: robbond <rob@rdbsolutions.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:15:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] test(experiment): checkpoint separated reasoning layers
 result

---
 .../results/rto-layer-separated-live.json     | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/experimental/results/rto-layer-separated-live.json

diff --git a/tests/experimental/results/rto-layer-separated-live.json b/tests/experimental/results/rto-layer-separated-live.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9e33d86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/experimental/results/rto-layer-separated-live.json
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+{
+  "apparatus": "rto-layer-separated-focused-reasoning.mjs",
+  "experiment": "RTO.16A",
+  "artifactType": "LIVE RESULT — RTO.16A separated layers invocation",
+  "modelName": "qwen-claude:latest",
+  "elapsedMs": 42119,
+  "promptLength": 6139,
+  "centralCaseStatementSupplied": true,
+  "layerStructure": {
+    "focusedUnderstanding": "object",
+    "decisionSignificance": "array"
+  },
+  "structuredResult": {
+    "focusedUnderstanding": {
+      "targetNodeId": "nxmeiab",
+      "observations": [
+        "One competitor has recruited machine-learning engineers and a senior product manager for this market segment.",
+        "That same competitor presented at an industry conference addressing the specific customer problem, though without announcing a product, launch date, or beta programme.",
+        "The direct equivalence between these recruitment/conference activities and a tangible competing product remains unverified.",
+        "The product retains its protected intellectual property, proprietary processes, and software algorithms which are currently unavailable to competitors."
+      ],
+      "uncertainties": [
+        "Whether the observed hiring and presentation activity constitutes development of a viable product directly competing with the target offering.",
+        "The development timeline and release readiness of the detected competitor relative to the twelve-month decision window.",
+        "How the competitor's potential technical approaches align with or circumvent existing patent claims and algorithmic barriers.",
+        "The level of parallel development activity among other competitors beyond the single observed entity."
+      ],
+      "assumptions": [
+        "Existing IP portfolio continues to serve as an effective barrier to rapid replication by competitors.",
+        "Competitors face non-trivial costs or technical hurdles in bypassing proprietary algorithms and processes.",
+        "The detected competitor possesses sufficient resources to sustain active development in response to the target customer problem."
+      ],
+      "relationships": [
+        {
+          "from": "Patents & Proprietary Algorithms",
+          "to": "Competitor Replication Difficulty",
+          "type": "Restricts"
+        },
+        {
+          "from": "Hiring & Conference Activity",
+          "to": "Potential Competing Development",
+          "type": "Suggests (Unverified)"
+        },
+        {
+          "from": "Unverified Signals",
+          "to": "Release Timeline Estimation",
+          "type": "Obscures"
+        }
+      ],
+      "possibleFollowUpQuestions": [
+        "Can the content of the competitor's conference presentation be analyzed to distinguish between technical R&D and general market education?",
+        "Does the scope of the recruited roles align with specific claims within our patent portfolio, indicating a direct work-around attempt?",
+        "Are there additional industry signals (e.g., customer pilot announcements, vendor listings) confirming the competitor's product trajectory beyond hiring and presentations?"
+      ]
+    },
+    "decisionSignificance": [
+      {
+        "insight": "Active recruitment and presentation signals suggest a competitor may reach the market within the twelve-month wait window, narrowing the strategic advantage of launching this year."
+      },
+      {
+        "insight": "The unverified nature of these signals creates timing risk where deferring £300,000 in costs may inadvertently cede first-mover territory if competitor development accelerates faster than anticipated."
+      },
+      {
+        "insight": "Intellectual property effectiveness determines whether the observed competitor activity merely delays entry or threatens immediate revenue stability, impacting the trade-off between cost savings and market capture."
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file