experiment: validate live question-rejection ownership

2026-08-17 18:25:40 +01:00
parent 7685a4f2af
commit a52f0345a1
2 changed files with 113 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -56,3 +56,15 @@
 - one observation-only live product-launch validation using the fixed scenario from the recorded journey
 - no production changes during the experiment
 - verify that the live LLM responds consistently to the null-question state and continues investigation on ntpt9ki
+
+---
+
+## Experiment 60B.95 result (2026-08-17)
+
+**Classification: E — LIVE PATH DIVERGED**
+
+The live model selected nk6eyn2 ("exact monetary value of potential enterprise contract relative to £300k launch cost") as the investigation target, not npzfx36 ("likelihood, negotiation stage, and targeted signing date for the large enterprise customer"). Both are unresolved unknowns in the same scenario. An acceptable question was produced ("What outcome would demonstrate enough value to justify launching a software product now?"), so the question-rejection boundary was not reached.
+
+**What this establishes:** The live engine can produce an acceptable graph-backed question on a fresh product-launch start without requiring decomposition.
+
+**What this does NOT prove:** Whether investigation ownership is preserved when a selected target's formulation is rejected (the core invariant from checkpoint 60B.93). The question-rejection boundary was not reached because the live model chose a different investigation target with an acceptable question path.