experiment: confirm live explicit sufficiency closure
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
# Experiment 60B.82 — Live Explicit Confirmation Closure Confirmed
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-15
|
||||
**Branch:** `feature/decision-closure-ownership-v0.47`
|
||||
**Preceded by:** Experiment 60B.81 (live no-confirmation State B path confirmed)
|
||||
**Type:** Paired live observation — explicit-confirmation positive branch
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
After 60B.81 proved the negative branch (no confirmation → decision stays open + sufficiency question), answer: does explicit sufficiency confirmation still close the decision cleanly?
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
final represented factor resolves
|
||||
+
|
||||
explicit sufficiency confirmation present
|
||||
=>
|
||||
parent decision may close
|
||||
=>
|
||||
active target clears
|
||||
=>
|
||||
no further question
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Method
|
||||
|
||||
- **Fixture:** `tests/fixtures/pre-anchored-product-launch-customer-signing.json`
|
||||
- **Input (ANSWER_2):** `"The enterprise customer has now confirmed in writing that they will not sign if we launch this year, so the £700,000 of expected annual revenue from them will not be received. There are no other material uncertainties between launching this year and waiting twelve months."`
|
||||
- **Crucially present:** `"There are no other material uncertainties"` — explicit sufficiency confirmation
|
||||
- **Mode:** updateOnly (1 update call via production HTTP route)
|
||||
|
||||
## Result
|
||||
|
||||
**Classification: A — LIVE EXPLICIT-CONFIRMATION CLOSURE CONFIRMED**
|
||||
|
||||
### Observed
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Customer status | resolved |
|
||||
| Decision status | resolved (terminal) |
|
||||
| resolvedUnknownNodeIds | ["n_enterprise_customer_signing", "n_product_launch_decision"] |
|
||||
| finalActiveUnknownNodeId | null |
|
||||
| finalSelectedQuestion | null |
|
||||
| addedNodes | [] |
|
||||
| addedEdges | [] |
|
||||
| Financial revision | £1.2M/year → £500k/year (correctly reflects £700k enterprise loss) |
|
||||
|
||||
### What This Proves
|
||||
|
||||
1. Explicit sufficiency confirmation ("no other material uncertainties") flows cleanly through the 60B.80 gate to terminal closure of the parent decision.
|
||||
2. Both the paired negative branch (60B.81: no confirmation → State B) and positive branch (60B.82: explicit confirmation → terminal close) are now live-baselined.
|
||||
3. The confirmation-gated lifecycle is symmetric and complete in production.
|
||||
|
||||
### What Remains Unproven by This Run
|
||||
|
||||
- Edge-case confirmation phrasings (implicit, partial, or negated confirmation language).
|
||||
- Multi-node simultaneous resolution with confirmation.
|
||||
- Confirmation under contradiction reasoning constraints.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user