docs: record selected-question ownership diagnosis
This commit is contained in:
+24
-1
@@ -1066,4 +1066,27 @@ Tested the inverse half of the uncertainty identity rule from 57J.56: when a gra
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key finding:** Semantic interpretation works correctly (distinct savings-realism uncertainty identified), but structural linkage failed silently — no existing node was updated to reflect the uncertainty, so the proposal lacked the graph state needed for downstream question selection. This is a different failure mode from 57J.56 which DID update nx54wwa successfully.
|
**Key finding:** Semantic interpretation works correctly (distinct savings-realism uncertainty identified), but structural linkage failed silently — no existing node was updated to reflect the uncertainty, so the proposal lacked the graph state needed for downstream question selection. This is a different failure mode from 57J.56 which DID update nx54wwa successfully.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**What remains unproven:** Whether Answer 2 would reuse or duplicate; downstream investigation viability; cross-domain generalisation. Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. **Production code changed:** NO. **Ollama calls:** 0 live calls (update rejected before mutation). APPEND_EOF
|
**What remains unproven:** Whether Answer 2 would reuse or duplicate; downstream investigation viability; cross-domain generalisation. Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. **Production code changed:** NO. **Ollama calls:** 0 live calls (update rejected before mutation).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Experiment 57J.58 — Selected-Question Ownership Diagnosis Confirmation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Objective:** Record durable handoff facts from `docs/experiment-57j58.md` which diagnosed why a proposal adding a new unresolved unknown was rejected due to missing `selectedQuestion`, and classified the root cause.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**validateQuestionSelectionRequirement() rejects when:**
|
||||||
|
- `selectedQuestion == null`
|
||||||
|
- AND
|
||||||
|
- proposal adds at least one non-resolved unknown
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**requirement does NOT depend on:**
|
||||||
|
- `updatedNodes`
|
||||||
|
- actual `resolvedUnknownNodeIds`
|
||||||
|
- total existing unresolved-node count
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**prompt rule #16 says selectedQuestion "may" identify a candidate**
|
||||||
|
**validator treats it as mandatory for added unresolved unknowns**
|
||||||
|
**classification = PROMPT CONTRACT GAP**
|
||||||
|
**smallest next boundary = prompt-only clarification**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Configured Ollama: none used. **Production code changed:** NO.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user