fix(confidence-engine): supply focused deconstruction schema

tests/focused-deconstruct-boundary.test.js

@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
  *   API response targetNodeId regardless of what the model returns.
  */
 
-import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";
+import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";
+import { focusedDeconstructJsonSchema } from "@/lib/graph/focused-investigation";
 
 // ── helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
@@ -36,6 +37,14 @@ function makeMockProvider(inventedTargetNodeId) {
 // ── Boundary test ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
 describe("focused-deconstruct targetNodeId identity boundary", () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vi.resetModules();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vi.doUnmock("@/lib/llm/provider");
+  });
+
   it("request targetNodeId overrides model-invented targetNodeId", async () => {
     const requestTargetNodeId = "nk04xvk"; // original graph node ID
     const inventedModelId = "invented-model-id";
@@ -73,6 +82,45 @@ describe("focused-deconstruct targetNodeId identity boundary", () => {
     expect(json.targetNodeId).not.toBe(inventedModelId);
   });
 
+  it("supplies the focused-deconstruction schema through the provider seam", async () => {
+    const generateReconstruction = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
+      response: {
+        targetNodeId: "model-id",
+        observations: [],
+        uncertainties: [],
+        assumptions: [],
+        relationships: [],
+        possibleFollowUpQuestions: [],
+      },
+      providerApiPath: "/api/chat",
+      providerExecution: { chatRequestAttempted: true },
+    });
+    vi.doMock("@/lib/llm/provider", () => ({
+      getProvider: () => ({ generateReconstruction }),
+    }));
+    const { POST } = await import("../app/api/focused-investigation/deconstruct/route.js");
+
+    const response = await POST(new Request("http://localhost/api/focused-investigation/deconstruct", {
+      method: "POST",
+      headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
+      body: JSON.stringify({
+        targetNodeId: "node-id",
+        targetLabel: "label",
+        targetDescription: "description",
+        centralStatement: "central statement",
+        question: "question?",
+        answer: "answer.",
+      }),
+    }));
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+    expect(generateReconstruction).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.any(String),
+      process.env.OLLAMA_MODEL,
+      focusedDeconstructJsonSchema,
+    );
+  });
+
   it("semantic fields pass through unchanged from model", async () => {
     const mockObs = ["doc is minimal", "processes in founder's head"];
     const mockUnc = ["whether formal docs can capture tacit knowledge"];
@@ -157,9 +205,6 @@ describe("focused-deconstruct targetNodeId identity boundary", () => {
   });
 
   it("full identity path: request → response → contribution", async () => {
-    // Reset modules to avoid mock leakage from earlier tests
-    vi.resetModules();
-
     const originalNodeId = "nk04xvk";
     const modelInventedId = "investigation_node_responsibility_distribution_autonomy";
 
@@ -231,8 +276,6 @@ describe("focused-deconstruct targetNodeId identity boundary", () => {
   });
 
   it("provider envelope fields do not leak into API response", async () => {
-    vi.resetModules();
-
     vi.doMock("@/lib/llm/provider", () => ({
       getProvider: () => ({
         generateReconstruction: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({