robbond/confidence-engine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

experiment: validate conflict-free mutation prompt live

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
robbond
2026-08-11 13:36:03 +01:00
parent 45d7b96827
commit acd1928ebb
2 changed files with 140 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/current-handoff.md
+22
View File
@@ -751,3 +751,25 @@ Configured Ollama: none used. Production code changed: NO. Prompt changed: NO. T
**Classification: E — IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETE (prompt correction only)**
Configured Ollama: none used. Production code changed: prompt + tests only. Dev server disturbed: NO.
### Experiment 57J.44 — Direct Live Test of Conflict-Free Mutation Prompt
**Objective:** Answer whether the v0.18 corrected Additional Guidance bullets now produce structural graph mutation from faithful uncertainty (one simple unresolved question about savings realism).
**Fixed scenario:** "We are considering relocating the engineering team to reduce operating costs."
**Fixed answer:** "I am unsure whether the projected office savings from the relocation are realistic."
**Live-call count:** start: 1, update: 1, total: 2
**START:** HTTP 200 | stage: unknown | nodes: 6 | edges: 3 | question: "What would clarify current operating costs for the present location versus projected post-relocation costs and one-time relocation expenses in this situation?"
**UPDATE 1:** HTTP 422 | stage: proposal_compatibility | error: "answerMeaning.userSupportedMeaning is populated, but the proposal contains no graph mutation. answerMeaning alone does not constitute graph progress."
- Nodes: 6 | Edges: 3 (unchanged)
**Rejected Proposal Snapshot:** `userSupportedMeaning`: "The user is unsure whether the projected office savings from the relocation are realistic." — FAITHFUL (no strengthening). `possibleInference`: about inflated projections negating benefits. All structural mutation fields empty (zero addedNodes, zero addedEdges, zero resolvedUnknownNodeIds, zero updatedNodes with meaningful change).
**Meaning classification:** FAITHFUL — v0.18 eliminated the conditional-strengthening defect from 57J.40 (v0.17).
**Classification: B — SAME FAITHFUL NO-OP.** The prompt contradiction was removed but faithful uncertainty alone still produced zero structural mutation for this model on this scenario. The action-selection gap under rule #6 (identified by 57J.42 as intentionally left unresolved) remains unaddressed.
Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed.