feat: back next questions with explicit graph unknowns

tests/ui/scenario-form.test.jsx

@@ -115,32 +115,46 @@ function makeUpdateSuccess(overrides = {}) {
         },
         {
           id: "n-next-unknown",
-          label: "Commercial value definition",
-          description: "Need a definition because the decision depends on it.",
+          label:
+            "Explanation for why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period",
+          description:
+            "Need to understand what change or event could explain why these observations differ, because that is needed to investigate their relationship.",
           kind: "unknown",
           status: "unknown",
-          confidence: "high",
+          confidence: "medium",
           value: null,
           unit: null,
         },
       ],
-      edges: [],
+      edges: [
+        {
+          id: "e-rel-next",
+          fromNodeId: "n-conclusion",
+          toNodeId: "n-next-unknown",
+          relationship: "depends_on",
+          confidence: "medium",
+          description:
+            "This unresolved explanation arises from the now-assessed relationship between the observations.",
+        },
+      ],
     },
     proposal: {
       addedNodes: [
         {
           id: "n-next-unknown",
-          label: "Commercial value definition",
-          description: "Need a definition because the decision depends on it.",
+          label:
+            "Explanation for why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period",
+          description:
+            "Need to understand what change or event could explain why these observations differ, because that is needed to investigate their relationship.",
           kind: "unknown",
           status: "unknown",
-          confidence: "high",
+          confidence: "medium",
           value: null,
           unit: null,
           evidenceIds: [],
-          dependsOn: [],
+          dependsOn: ["n-conclusion"],
           affects: [],
-          parentId: null,
+          parentId: "n-conclusion",
           childIds: [],
         },
       ],
@@ -153,19 +167,27 @@ function makeUpdateSuccess(overrides = {}) {
       affectedNodeIds: ["n-conclusion"],
       selectedQuestion: {
         nodeId: "n-next-unknown",
-        question: "How should commercial value be defined for this decision?",
-        reason: "A narrower consequential uncertainty remains.",
+        question:
+          "What changed during that period that could help explain why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
+        reason:
+          "Formulated as a neutral clarification question because no narrower investigation strategy clearly applied.",
       },
     },
     selectedQuestion: {
       nodeId: "n-next-unknown",
-      question: "How should commercial value be defined for this decision?",
-      reason: "A narrower consequential uncertainty remains.",
+      question:
+        "What changed during that period that could help explain why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
+      reason:
+        "Formulated as a neutral clarification question because no narrower investigation strategy clearly applied.",
     },
     affectedNodeIds: ["n-conclusion"],
     resolvedUnknownNodeIds: ["n-unknown"],
     previousActiveUnknownNodeId: "n-unknown",
     newActiveUnknownNodeId: "n-next-unknown",
+    emergentReasoningNodeCreated: true,
+    emergentReasoningNodeId: "n-next-unknown",
+    emergentReasoningNodeReason:
+      "Created a new unresolved reasoning unknown so the next justified question is backed by the graph.",
     previousReasoningState: {
       comparabilityStatus: "uncertain",
       reasoningStages: [
@@ -404,7 +426,9 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
     );
 
     expect(html).toContain("Newly surfaced unknowns");
-    expect(html).toContain("Commercial value definition");
+    expect(html).toContain(
+      "Explanation for why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period",
+    );
   });
 
   it("affected nodes render", () => {
@@ -432,7 +456,7 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
     );
 
     expect(html).toContain(
-      "How should commercial value be defined for this decision?",
+      "What changed during that period that could help explain why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
     );
   });
 
@@ -469,7 +493,9 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
     expect(html).toContain("Previous active unknown");
     expect(html).toContain("Complaint rate denominator");
     expect(html).toContain("New active unknown");
-    expect(html).toContain("Commercial value definition");
+    expect(html).toContain(
+      "Explanation for why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period",
+    );
   });
 
   it("successful update renders prior and new state together", () => {
@@ -488,7 +514,7 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
     expect(html).toContain("New active unknown");
     expect(html).toContain("Next question");
     expect(html).toContain(
-      "How should commercial value be defined for this decision?",
+      "What changed during that period that could help explain why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
     );
   });
 
@@ -543,7 +569,9 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
       />,
     );
 
-    expect(html).toContain("How should commercial value be defined for this decision?");
+    expect(html).toContain(
+      "What changed during that period that could help explain why revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
+    );
   });
 
   it("raw ids remain only in collapsed proposal details", () => {