feat: enforce reasoning pattern consistency
This commit is contained in:
@@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ function buildDiagnostics({
|
||||
rejectedQuestionFamilies,
|
||||
selectedQuestionTemplate,
|
||||
reasoningPatternReason,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds,
|
||||
compatibilityFailures,
|
||||
replacementActions,
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity,
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
promptVersion: analysis?.promptVersion ?? null,
|
||||
@@ -100,6 +106,12 @@ function buildDiagnostics({
|
||||
rejectedQuestionFamilies: rejectedQuestionFamilies ?? [],
|
||||
selectedQuestionTemplate: selectedQuestionTemplate ?? null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternReason: reasoningPatternReason ?? null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation: reasoningPatternValidation ?? null,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount: patternCompatibleNodeCount ?? 0,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: incompatibleNodeIds ?? [],
|
||||
compatibilityFailures: compatibilityFailures ?? [],
|
||||
replacementActions: replacementActions ?? [],
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity: graphReasoningIntegrity ?? null,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -200,6 +212,12 @@ function buildUpdateDiagnostics({
|
||||
candidateNodeIds,
|
||||
resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds,
|
||||
noQuestionReason,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds,
|
||||
compatibilityFailures,
|
||||
replacementActions,
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity,
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
promptVersion: promptVersion ?? "v0.4",
|
||||
@@ -291,6 +309,12 @@ function buildUpdateDiagnostics({
|
||||
candidateNodeIds: candidateNodeIds ?? [],
|
||||
resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds: resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds ?? [],
|
||||
noQuestionReason: noQuestionReason ?? null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation: reasoningPatternValidation ?? null,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount: patternCompatibleNodeCount ?? 0,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: incompatibleNodeIds ?? [],
|
||||
compatibilityFailures: compatibilityFailures ?? [],
|
||||
replacementActions: replacementActions ?? [],
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity: graphReasoningIntegrity ?? null,
|
||||
unknownSelectionExplanation: unknownSelectionExplanation ?? null,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -419,6 +443,16 @@ export async function startCase(body) {
|
||||
reasoningPatternReason:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.selectedQuestion?.reasoningPatternReason ??
|
||||
null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.reasoningPatternValidation ?? null,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.patternCompatibleNodeCount ?? 0,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: initialQuestionResult.incompatibleNodeIds ?? [],
|
||||
compatibilityFailures:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.compatibilityFailures ?? [],
|
||||
replacementActions: initialQuestionResult.replacementActions ?? [],
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.graphReasoningIntegrity ?? null,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
validationErrors: graphReferenceValidation.errors,
|
||||
statusCode: 500,
|
||||
@@ -475,6 +509,15 @@ export async function startCase(body) {
|
||||
null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternReason:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.selectedQuestion?.reasoningPatternReason ?? null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.reasoningPatternValidation ?? null,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.patternCompatibleNodeCount ?? 0,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: initialQuestionResult.incompatibleNodeIds ?? [],
|
||||
compatibilityFailures: initialQuestionResult.compatibilityFailures ?? [],
|
||||
replacementActions: initialQuestionResult.replacementActions ?? [],
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity:
|
||||
initialQuestionResult.graphReasoningIntegrity ?? null,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -675,6 +718,12 @@ async function updateCaseWithDependencies(body, dependencies = {}) {
|
||||
candidateNodeIds: [],
|
||||
resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds: [],
|
||||
noQuestionReason: null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation: null,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount: 0,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: [],
|
||||
compatibilityFailures: [],
|
||||
replacementActions: [],
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity: null,
|
||||
plainLanguageNormalisations: [],
|
||||
unknownSelectionExplanation: explainUnknownSelection(
|
||||
situationGraph,
|
||||
@@ -780,6 +829,14 @@ async function updateCaseWithDependencies(body, dependencies = {}) {
|
||||
resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds:
|
||||
applicationResult.resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds,
|
||||
noQuestionReason: applicationResult.noQuestionReason,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation:
|
||||
applicationResult.reasoningPatternValidation,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount:
|
||||
applicationResult.patternCompatibleNodeCount,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: applicationResult.incompatibleNodeIds,
|
||||
compatibilityFailures: applicationResult.compatibilityFailures,
|
||||
replacementActions: applicationResult.replacementActions,
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity: applicationResult.graphReasoningIntegrity,
|
||||
plainLanguageNormalisations:
|
||||
applicationResult.plainLanguageNormalisations,
|
||||
reasoningPattern:
|
||||
@@ -876,6 +933,12 @@ async function updateCaseWithDependencies(body, dependencies = {}) {
|
||||
candidateNodeIds: [],
|
||||
resolvedCurrentTurnNodeIds: [],
|
||||
noQuestionReason: null,
|
||||
reasoningPatternValidation: null,
|
||||
patternCompatibleNodeCount: 0,
|
||||
incompatibleNodeIds: [],
|
||||
compatibilityFailures: [],
|
||||
replacementActions: [],
|
||||
graphReasoningIntegrity: null,
|
||||
plainLanguageNormalisations: [],
|
||||
reasoningPattern: null,
|
||||
questionFamily: null,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user