feat: classify observation relationships after comparability

2026-08-02 16:40:24 +01:00
parent 0c7558d31f
commit c97f5f7303
5 changed files with 316 additions and 50 deletions
@@ -323,17 +323,34 @@ describe("formulateQuestion", () => {
      status: "supported",
      confidence: "medium",
    });
+    const revenueObservation = makeNode({
+      id: "n-revenue-observation",
+      label: "Revenue increased by 18%.",
+      description: "Revenue increased by 18%.",
+      kind: "observation",
+      status: "supported",
+      confidence: "high",
+    });
+    const cashObservation = makeNode({
+      id: "n-cash-observation",
+      label: "Cash in the bank decreased over the same period.",
+      description: "Cash in the bank decreased over the same period.",
+      kind: "observation",
+      status: "supported",
+      confidence: "high",
+    });
    const graph = makeGraphFor(unknown, {
      centralStatement:
        "Revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period.",
-      nodes: [contradiction],
+      nodes: [contradiction, revenueObservation, cashObservation],
    });

    const result = formulateTieResolutionQuestion({ graph });

    expect(result.question).toBe(
-      "What changed during the period that could explain why Revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period?",
+      "Were these figures measured on the same basis and at the same scale?",
    );
+    expect(result.comparabilityStatus).toBe("uncertain");
    expect(result.question.toLowerCase()).not.toMatch(
      /accounts receivable|capex|debt repayments|working capital/,
    );