feat: decompose composite unknowns before questioning
This commit is contained in:
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ function makeUpdateSuccess(overrides = {}) {
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "n-child-1",
|
||||
label: "Timing or measurement basis",
|
||||
label: "How the two observations were measured",
|
||||
description:
|
||||
"Need evidence about whether a timing or measurement-basis difference could explain revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period, because that would change how the observations should be interpreted.",
|
||||
"Need evidence about the measure used for each observation, because that could help explain revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period.",
|
||||
kind: "unknown",
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
confidence: "medium",
|
||||
@@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ function makeUpdateSuccess(overrides = {}) {
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "n-child-1",
|
||||
label: "Timing or measurement basis",
|
||||
label: "How the two observations were measured",
|
||||
description:
|
||||
"Need evidence about whether a timing or measurement-basis difference could explain revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period, because that would change how the observations should be interpreted.",
|
||||
"Need evidence about the measure used for each observation, because that could help explain revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period.",
|
||||
kind: "unknown",
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
confidence: "medium",
|
||||
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ function makeUpdateSuccess(overrides = {}) {
|
||||
selectedQuestion: {
|
||||
nodeId: "n-child-1",
|
||||
question:
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify how the two observations were measured?",
|
||||
reason:
|
||||
"Formulated from graph context using the evidence_gathering investigation strategy.",
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ function makeUpdateSuccess(overrides = {}) {
|
||||
selectedQuestion: {
|
||||
nodeId: "n-child-1",
|
||||
question:
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify how the two observations were measured?",
|
||||
reason:
|
||||
"Formulated from graph context using the evidence_gathering investigation strategy.",
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(html).toContain(
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify how the two observations were measured?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
|
||||
expect(html).toContain("New active unknown");
|
||||
expect(html).toContain("Next question");
|
||||
expect(html).toContain(
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify how the two observations were measured?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
|
||||
expect(html).toContain("comparability: confirmed");
|
||||
expect(html).toContain("relationship: insufficient_information");
|
||||
expect(html).toContain(
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify how the two observations were measured?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(html).not.toContain("reasoning:comparability");
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ describe("graph-backed UI rendering", () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(html).toContain(
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify timing or measurement basis?",
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify how the two observations were measured?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user