experiment: observe direct meaning/action fields on anchored update
This commit is contained in:
@@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ _Created by Experiment 34. Updated by Experiments 38–53, 54A–54Z, 55A–55F,
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiment 57J.84 — Direct Meaning/Action Field Observation on Anchored £2m Update
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective:** For the anchored savings-realism case with new £2m/year information, what does the model directly populate for `userSupportedMeaning` and `structuralActionRequired`, and is the accepted proposal contract-consistent?
|
||||
|
||||
**Classification: D — MUTATION WITHOUT USER-SUPPORTED MEANING.** One update-only call via the committed update-only apparatus. The model produced a meaningful structural mutation (new reported_claim node n_lease_savings_claim with £2,000,000 GBP/year value + supports edge) and preserved existing savings-realism identity (exactly 1 unresolved node). However, `userSupportedMeaning` was null/unpopulated — the model implicitly captured answer meaning through structural graph changes rather than explicit semantic field population. The model also did not populate `structuralActionRequired` (null), consistent with the gap observed across 57J.81–57J.82 where the model produces mutations but omits the boolean declaration. £2m/year: REPRESENTED (value=2,000,000, unit=GBP/year on new node). Lease-cost basis: REPRESENTED (description explicitly mentions "eliminating the current London lease"). Configured Ollama: qwen-claude:latest at http://192.168.1.111:11434. No production code changed.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiment 57J.81 — Update-Only Previous Question Fix
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective:** Fix the 57J.80 apparatus defect where `FIXTURE_MODE=updateOnly` passes `previousQuestion = null` through to the production Zod validator, which rejects with `"Expected string, received null"` at `request_validation` stage before any model inference.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user