fix(focused-investigation): suppress incompatible question strategies
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
|
||||
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { makeGraph, makeNode } from "@/lib/graph/schema.js";
|
||||
|
||||
const generateReconstruction = vi.fn();
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@/lib/llm/provider", () => ({
|
||||
getProvider: () => ({ generateReconstruction }),
|
||||
getProviderModelName: () => "test-model",
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock("@/lib/supabase/api-auth.js", () => ({
|
||||
withAuthenticatedApi: (handler) => handler,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
function makeRecruitmentGraph() {
|
||||
const target = makeNode({
|
||||
id: "recruitment-target",
|
||||
label: "Staffing certainty gap",
|
||||
description:
|
||||
"Whether additional skilled staff needed for expansion can be recruited",
|
||||
kind: "unknown",
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
confidence: "medium",
|
||||
});
|
||||
return makeGraph({
|
||||
centralStatement:
|
||||
"We need to compare our current baseline against the comparable state before staffing is secured for expansion.",
|
||||
currentSummary: "Test summary",
|
||||
nodes: [target],
|
||||
edges: [],
|
||||
activeUnknownNodeId: target.id,
|
||||
resolvedNodeIds: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function makeHistoricalGraph() {
|
||||
const target = makeNode({
|
||||
id: "historical-target",
|
||||
label: "Baseline conversion rate",
|
||||
description:
|
||||
"Need the previous baseline because the change cannot be assessed without it.",
|
||||
kind: "unknown",
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
confidence: "medium",
|
||||
});
|
||||
return makeGraph({
|
||||
centralStatement: "Assess the change against the comparable prior baseline.",
|
||||
currentSummary: "Test summary",
|
||||
nodes: [target],
|
||||
edges: [],
|
||||
activeUnknownNodeId: target.id,
|
||||
resolvedNodeIds: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function makeRequest(graph, targetNodeId = graph.nodes[0].id) {
|
||||
return new Request("http://localhost/api/focused-investigation/formulate", {
|
||||
method: "POST",
|
||||
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
|
||||
body: JSON.stringify({ situationGraph: graph, targetNodeId }),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
describe("POST /api/focused-investigation/formulate semantic compatibility", () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockReset();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
afterEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.useRealTimers();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("suppresses an assessor-incompatible strategy without changing the selected target or graph", async () => {
|
||||
const graph = makeRecruitmentGraph();
|
||||
const snapshot = JSON.stringify(graph);
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
response: {
|
||||
strategyKey: "baseline_reconstruction",
|
||||
relevance: "incompatible",
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/focused-investigation/formulate/route.js");
|
||||
|
||||
const response = await POST(makeRequest(graph));
|
||||
const json = await response.json();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(json.targetNodeId).toBe("recruitment-target");
|
||||
expect(json.strategy).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(json.question).toBe(
|
||||
"What evidence would clarify whether additional skilled staff needed for expansion can be recruited?",
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(JSON.stringify(graph)).toBe(snapshot);
|
||||
expect(generateReconstruction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("does not let a compatible semantic verdict authorize a grammatically incompatible baseline template", async () => {
|
||||
const graph = makeRecruitmentGraph();
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
response: {
|
||||
strategyKey: "baseline_reconstruction",
|
||||
relevance: "compatible",
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/focused-investigation/formulate/route.js");
|
||||
|
||||
const response = await POST(makeRequest(graph));
|
||||
const json = await response.json();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(json.strategy).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(json.question.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("before whether");
|
||||
expect(json.question).toContain("What evidence would clarify whether");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("preserves a compatible historical strategy when its template is suitable", async () => {
|
||||
const graph = makeHistoricalGraph();
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
response: {
|
||||
strategyKey: "baseline_reconstruction",
|
||||
relevance: "compatible",
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/focused-investigation/formulate/route.js");
|
||||
|
||||
const response = await POST(makeRequest(graph));
|
||||
const json = await response.json();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(json.strategy).toBe("baseline_reconstruction");
|
||||
expect(json.question).toContain("What was the comparable state before");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("treats invalid or mismatched assessment output as non-authorizing", async () => {
|
||||
const graph = makeRecruitmentGraph();
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
response: { strategyKey: "evidence_gathering", relevance: "compatible" },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/focused-investigation/formulate/route.js");
|
||||
|
||||
const response = await POST(makeRequest(graph));
|
||||
const json = await response.json();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(json.strategy).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(json.question).toContain("What evidence would clarify whether");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("treats provider unavailability as non-authorizing fallback", async () => {
|
||||
const graph = makeRecruitmentGraph();
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockRejectedValue(
|
||||
Object.assign(new Error("provider unavailable"), { code: "PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE" }),
|
||||
);
|
||||
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/focused-investigation/formulate/route.js");
|
||||
|
||||
const response = await POST(makeRequest(graph));
|
||||
const json = await response.json();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(json.strategy).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(json.question).toContain("What evidence would clarify whether");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("aborts the one assessment invocation at the route deadline and falls back", async () => {
|
||||
vi.useFakeTimers();
|
||||
const graph = makeRecruitmentGraph();
|
||||
let observedSignal;
|
||||
generateReconstruction.mockImplementation((_, __, ___, { signal }) => {
|
||||
observedSignal = signal;
|
||||
return new Promise((_, reject) => {
|
||||
signal.addEventListener("abort", () => {
|
||||
const error = new Error("assessment aborted");
|
||||
error.name = "AbortError";
|
||||
reject(error);
|
||||
}, { once: true });
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/focused-investigation/formulate/route.js");
|
||||
|
||||
const responsePromise = POST(makeRequest(graph));
|
||||
await vi.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(10000);
|
||||
const response = await responsePromise;
|
||||
const json = await response.json();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(observedSignal.aborted).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(json.strategy).toBeNull();
|
||||
expect(json.question).toContain("What evidence would clarify whether");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user