robbond/confidence-engine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: record uncertainty proposition coverage

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
robbond
2026-08-14 06:16:14 +01:00
parent 1f361e2d93
commit f94d47d813
2 changed files with 141 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/current-handoff.md
+9
View File
@@ -174,6 +174,15 @@ Experiment 54N tested whether an interpretation disagreement can be judged for m
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (29/29)
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.24 regression through the full end-to-end runtime path.
### 60B.28 explicit uncertainty-prefix proposition coverage
- 60B.27 exposed a narrow coverage gap: descriptions starting `Unknown whether...` fell through to nominal label extraction instead of the existing bounded `whether ...` proposition path.
- `extractMeaning()` now extends the same case-insensitive prefix normalisation used before proposition extraction to also strip explicit uncertainty markers `unknown` and `uncertain`.
- As a result, `Whether...`, `Unknown whether...`, `Uncertain whether...`, `Uncertainty about whether...`, and `Uncertainty regarding whether...` now all expose `whether X` before existing rationale stripping and evidence framing run.
- Focused deterministic verification passed:
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (37/37)
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.27 customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path.
### When This Knowledge-Management Phase Is Complete
Provisional criteria for review (all confirmed met by Experiment 38 cold-start test):