- Experiment 57J.49: read-only architecture diagnosis showing EXISTING STRUCTURE IS PARTIAL
- All classification enums (supportCategory) and resolution enums (resolutionGuidance) already exist in production schema
- Gap is population (prompt says leave null if unsure) + enforcement (no enum constraint on Zod fields)
- Corrected 57J.48 overstatement of SUFFICIENT → PARTIAL sufficiency in handoff
Add one explicit action-order rule in Additional Guidance for when
rule #6 applies to explicitly unresolved uncertainty:
1. First check whether an existing unresolved node already represents
the same uncertainty.
2. If so, update/refine that existing structure rather than creating
a duplicate.
3. If no such node exists, add a new unknown that directly represents
the unresolved uncertainty.
4. Do not use an edge alone to represent a previously unrepresented
uncertainty.
14 focused prompt tests verify: existing-first ordering, reuse path,
fallback-to-add, related-node-insufficient, edge-only-prohibited,
possibleInference separation, resolution path preserved, duplicate
contract preserved, scope uncertainty-only, fidelity/traceability
preserved, noop validator untouched, no semantic classifier added.
Adds rejectedProposalSnapshot to orchestrator diagnostics for
proposal_compatibility rejections — exposing answerMeaning (userSupportedMeaning,
possibleInference), addedNodes structural fields, addedEdges structural fields,
updatedNodes summaries, and resolvedUnknownNodeIds. Diagnostic evidence only;
does not alter validation, mutation, or error messages. Stage-gated to
proposal_compatibility only.
v0.15 duplicated the overlap helper logic in hasNodeLevelUserSupport with
reversed argument orientation (unknownText as source, userSupportedMeaning
as candidate) compared to rawAnswerSupportsUnclassifiedMeaning (USM as
source, unknownText as candidate). This produced different accept/reject
outcomes when the two texts have very different token counts.
The fix replaces the independent reconstruction with a single call to the
canonical helper, ensuring node-level and answer-meaning alignment use
identical semantics. Four boundary regression tests verify:
- Boundary A: overlap ratio < 0.4 but >= 3 shared tokens → accept (token rule)
- Boundary B: short candidate / long source accepted via structural linkage
- Boundary B control: unrelated unknown rejected with no structural edge
- Boundary C: ratio exactly at 0.4 threshold accepts via ratio rule
robbond