components/reasoning-workspace.jsx

@@ -471,7 +471,9 @@ function EvidenceLimitCard({ summary }) {
 // ── Prior contribution summary (embedded within FocusedQuestionBody) ───
 
 function PriorContributionsSummary({ nodeId, contributions }) {
-  const threadContribs = contributions.filter((c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId);
+  const threadContribs = (contributions || []).filter(
+    (c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId || c.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId,
+  );
   if (!threadContribs.length) return null;
 
   // Exclude the most recent contribution — it is already shown as the current result above.
@@ -519,7 +521,9 @@ function PriorContributionsSummary({ nodeId, contributions }) {
 // ── Standalone previous learning block (for two-column secondary placement) ───
 
 function SecondaryPreviousLearning({ nodeId, contributions }) {
-  const threadContribs = contributions.filter((c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId);
+  const threadContribs = (contributions || []).filter(
+    (c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId || c.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId,
+  );
   if (!threadContribs.length) return null;
 
   // Exclude the most recent contribution — it is already shown as the current result above.
@@ -567,7 +571,9 @@ function SecondaryPreviousLearning({ nodeId, contributions }) {
 // ── Thread contributions badge (standalone — used outside focused body) ───
 
 function ThreadContributionsBadge({ nodeId, contributions }) {
-  const threadContribs = contributions.filter((c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId);
+  const threadContribs = (contributions || []).filter(
+    (c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId || c.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId,
+  );
   if (!threadContribs.length) return null;
 
   // Show most recent contribution summary inline
@@ -1401,7 +1407,7 @@ export default function ReasoningWorkspace({
     if (!target) return;
 
     const priorContribs = (focusedContributions || []).filter(
-      (c) => c.targetNodeId === target,
+      (c) => c.targetNodeId === target || c.originatingTargetNodeId === target,
     );
 
     setFocusedPresentationItemId(target);
@@ -1511,6 +1517,7 @@ export default function ReasoningWorkspace({
       // Persist contribution to case-level owner (ScenarioForm)
       onFocusedContribution?.({
         targetNodeId,
+        originatingTargetNodeId: focusedPresentationItemId,
         targetLabel: targetNode?.label || "",
         targetDescription: targetNode?.description || "",
         question: focused.question,

docs/current-handoff.md

@@ -1017,6 +1017,24 @@ The remaining boundaries are NOT persistence issues. They belong to the next fea
 - Finding merge/split ownership
 - Final Finding → graph mapping mechanism
 
+### v0.49 — MULTI-TURN / COLD-RETURN ACTIVITY VISIBILITY REPAIR (2026-08-28)
+
+**Closed:** Multi-turn/cold-return regression in Open Question activity visibility (INVESTIGATING cue).
+
+**Root cause:** `ThreadContributionsBadge`, `PriorContributionsSummary`, and `SecondaryPreviousLearning` all filtered contributions via `c.targetNodeId === nodeId`. Multi-turn follow-up Contributions carry a different immediate `targetNodeId` while the canonical origin remains on Findings (`originatingTargetNodeId`). When only the follow-up turn survives cold return, the filter finds zero matches.
+
+**Repaired identity rule:** All contribution filters now match on EITHER `c.targetNodeId === nodeId || c.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId`. This captures both direct-target contributions and follow-up contributions whose origin anchors to a different Open Question.
+
+**New persisted field on Contribution:** `originatingTargetNodeId` — set from `focusedPresentationItemId` at deconstruct submit time. It is NOT a new investigation flag; it is provenance that lets existing discovery surfaces recover multi-turn history.
+
+**Files changed:**
+- `components/reasoning-workspace.jsx` — patched 4 filter sites + `handleDeconstructSubmit` to carry `originatingTargetNodeId`
+- `tests/open-questions-vs-assumptions.test.jsx` — added v0.49 multi-turn regression tests and repaired `getThreadContribs` helper
+
+**No changes to:** Finding eligibility, Finding disposition, Current Understanding, Done-for-now promotion, SituationGraph, persistence provider, or graph reasoning.
+
+---
+
 ### BRANCH CLEAN STATE
 
 This branch has NO tracked working tree changes at HEAD b215846. Documentation closure recorded in this section only. No production or test modifications required.

tests/open-questions-vs-assumptions.test.jsx

@@ -749,7 +749,10 @@ describe("same-node focused result reopen", () => {
 
 describe("Focused investigation history cue", () => {
   function getThreadContribs(nodeId, contributions) {
-    return (contributions || []).filter((c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId);
+    // v0.49 repaired: match on targetNodeId OR originatingTargetNodeId
+    return (contributions || []).filter(
+      (c) => c.targetNodeId === nodeId || c.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId,
+    );
   }
 
   function showsInvestigatingCue(threadContribCount) {
@@ -856,4 +859,133 @@ describe("Focused investigation history cue", () => {
     expect(threadContribs).toHaveLength(0);
     expect(showsInvestigatingCue(threadContribs.length)).toBe(false);
   });
+
+  // ── v0.49 MULTI-TURN FOLLOW-UP REGRESSION ───────────────────
+  // Hypothesis: ThreadContributionsBadge depends only on the latest/direct
+  // Contribution targetNodeId, causing focused history to become invisible
+  // when follow-up turns retain a different immediate target identity.
+
+  it("multi-turn follow-up contribution with different targetNodeId causes OPEN QUESTION A to show NO INVESTIGATING (regression)", () => {
+    // Turn 1: direct contribution to Open Question A — this is the baseline that works
+    const contribTurn1 = {
+      id: "contrib-001",
+      targetNodeId: "oq-originating", // same as the Open Question node
+      question: "First focused question on A",
+      observations: ["Fact from turn 1"],
+      uncertainties: [],
+      assumptions: [],
+      relationships: [],
+    };
+
+    // Turn 2: follow-up contribution belongs to the SAME focused investigation
+    // but targets a different intermediate node (the follow-up itself)
+    const contribTurn2 = {
+      id: "contrib-002",
+      targetNodeId: "follow_up_intermediate", // DIFFERENT from oq-originating
+      question: "Follow-up on turn 1",
+      observations: ["Fact from turn 2"],
+      uncertainties: [],
+      assumptions: [],
+      relationships: [],
+    };
+
+    const contributions = [contribTurn1, contribTurn2];
+
+    // Both contributions exist — baseline check passes
+    expect(getThreadContribs("oq-originating", contributions).length).toBe(1);
+    expect(showsInvestigatingCue(getThreadContribs("oq-originating", contributions).length)).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it("multi-turn FOLLOW-UP ONLY: Open Question A shows INVESTIGATING when Turn 2 carries originatingTargetNodeId (repaired)", () => {
+    // After repair: follow-up contribution carries originatingTargetNodeId linking back to A.
+    const contribTurn2 = {
+      id: "contrib-002",
+      targetNodeId: "follow_up_intermediate",
+      originatingTargetNodeId: "oq-originating",
+      question: "Follow-up on turn 1",
+      observations: ["Fact from turn 2"],
+      uncertainties: [],
+      assumptions: [],
+      relationships: [],
+    };
+
+    const contributions = [contribTurn2];
+
+    // The repaired filter matches originatingTargetNodeId back to A
+    const threadContribs = getThreadContribs("oq-originating", contributions);
+    expect(threadContribs).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(showsInvestigatingCue(threadContribs.length)).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it("multi-turn with contributing to A directly still shows INVESTIGATING (no regression for direct contributions)", () => {
+    const contribToOrigin = {
+      id: "contrib-005",
+      targetNodeId: "oq-originating",
+      observations: ["direct to origin"],
+    };
+
+    const threadContribs = getThreadContribs("oq-originating", [contribToOrigin]);
+    expect(threadContribs).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(showsInvestigatingCue(threadContribs.length)).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it("multi-turn with originatingTargetNodeId recovers INVESTIGATING for A (repaired expectation)", () => {
+    // Simulated repaired state: Contribution carries originatingTargetNodeId
+    const contribTurn1 = {
+      id: "contrib-001",
+      targetNodeId: "oq-originating",
+      originatingTargetNodeId: "oq-originating",
+      observations: ["Fact from turn 1"],
+    };
+
+    const contribTurn2 = {
+      id: "contrib-002",
+      targetNodeId: "follow_up_intermediate",
+      originatingTargetNodeId: "oq-originating",
+      observations: ["Fact from turn 2"],
+    };
+
+    const contributions = [contribTurn1, contribTurn2];
+
+    // Repaired filter: matches direct OR originating target
+    const getThreadContribsRepaired = (nodeId, c) =>
+      (c || []).filter(
+        (item) => item.targetNodeId === nodeId || item.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId,
+      );
+
+    const threadContribs = getThreadContribsRepaired("oq-originating", contributions);
+    expect(threadContribs).toHaveLength(2);
+    expect(showsInvestigatingCue(threadContribs.length)).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it("multi-turn: repaired filter recovers INVESTIGATING when ONLY follow-up exists (cold return repaired)", () => {
+    const contribTurn2 = {
+      id: "contrib-002",
+      targetNodeId: "follow_up_intermediate",
+      originatingTargetNodeId: "oq-originating",
+      observations: ["Fact from turn 2"],
+    };
+
+    const getThreadContribsRepaired = (nodeId, c) =>
+      (c || []).filter(
+        (item) => item.targetNodeId === nodeId || item.originatingTargetNodeId === nodeId,
+      );
+
+    const threadContribs = getThreadContribsRepaired("oq-originating", [contribTurn2]);
+    expect(threadContribs).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(showsInvestigatingCue(threadContribs.length)).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it("unrelated follow-up does NOT falsely show INVESTIGATING on any Open Question", () => {
+    const unrelated = {
+      id: "contrib-unrelated",
+      targetNodeId: "some_other_node",
+      observations: [],
+    };
+
+    expect(getThreadContribs("oq-originating", [unrelated]).length).toBe(0);
+    expect(showsInvestigatingCue(getThreadContribs("oq-originating", [unrelated]).length)).toBe(false);
+    expect(getThreadContribs("some_other_node", [unrelated]).length).toBe(1);
+    // some_other_node would show INVESTIGATING, but it's NOT oq-originating
+  });
 });