# v0.6 Comparability Experiment

## Hypothesis

The engine should confirm that observations are comparable before treating their difference as a contradiction that needs explanatory follow-up.

## Fixtures

1. Revenue increased by 18%, but cash in the bank fell over the same period.
2. Complaints increased. Production increased.
3. Average delivery time decreased by 25%, but order cancellations increased.
4. Customer satisfaction increased, but complaints increased.
5. Temperature increased. Ice melted.
6. Sales doubled. Sales doubled.

## Results

- The first four scenarios repeated the same failure pattern: contradiction-level investigation could begin before comparability was established.
- A deterministic comparability gate corrected that by producing one comparison question first.
- Temperature increased / Ice melted was treated as comparability confirmed, so no comparison question was asked.
- Sales doubled / Sales doubled was treated as comparability confirmed, and contradiction reasoning was not needed.

## Whether comparability should become a permanent reasoning stage

Yes, in minimal deterministic form.

The repeated pattern appeared in four scenarios, so a small pre-contradiction comparability assessment is justified.