/**
 * Experiment 47 — Can Existing Graph Relationships Reveal a Shared Investigation Thread?
 *
 * Passive diagnostic experiment. Tests whether existing graph relationship fields
 * (dependsOn, affects, childIds, parentId, edges) can distinguish:
 *   A — several unknowns contributing to one coherent investigation;
 *   B — several unknowns belonging to unrelated lines of enquiry;
 *   C — several unknowns with no usable relationship data.
 *
 * No production code changes. No existing fixture modification.
 */

import { describe, it, expect } from "vitest";
import assessInvestigationState from "@/lib/assessment/investigation-state-assessor.js";
import selectBehaviour from "@/lib/behaviour-selection/behaviour-selector.js";

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Test-only diagnostic helper
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

/**
 * Inspect whether active unknowns share a common graph anchor.
 * Uses only existing fields: dependsOn, affects, childIds, parentId, edges.
 * Does not inspect node labels or descriptions (no text matching).
 *
 * Deterministic rules:
 *   shared_anchor          — all active unknowns reference exactly one common node;
 *   separate_anchors       — unknowns have relationship data but no common anchor;
 *   insufficient_data      — relationships are absent or incomplete.
 */
function inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph }) {
  const nodes = (graph && Array.isArray(graph.nodes)) ? [...graph.nodes] : [];
  const edges = (graph && Array.isArray(graph.edges)) ? [...graph.edges] : [];

  // Collect active unknowns (unknown kind, not resolved)
  const activeIds = new Set();
  const resolvedSet = new Set(graph.resolvedNodeIds || []);
  for (const n of nodes) {
    if (!n || n.kind !== "unknown") continue;
    if (resolvedSet.has(n.id) || n.status === "resolved") continue;
    activeIds.add(n.id);
  }

  const activeArr = [...activeIds];
  if (activeArr.length < 2) {
    return { result: "insufficient_data", anchorIds: [], reason: "fewer than two active unknowns" };
  }

  // Gather all referenced parent IDs from dependsOn, affects, parentId on the active nodes
  const referrerMap = new Map(); // nodeId -> Set of referenced node IDs

  for (const n of nodes) {
    if (!activeIds.has(n.id)) continue;
    const refs = new Set();
    if (Array.isArray(n.dependsOn)) n.dependsOn.forEach((id) => refs.add(id));
    if (Array.isArray(n.affects)) n.affects.forEach((id) => refs.add(id));
    if (n.parentId) refs.add(n.parentId);
    referrerMap.set(n.id, refs);
  }

  // Also gather referenced parent IDs from edges where the active unknown is the target
  const edgeAnchors = new Set();
  for (const e of edges) {
    if (!e || !e.fromNodeId || !e.toNodeId) continue;
    if (activeIds.has(e.toNodeId)) {
      edgeAnchors.add(e.fromNodeId);
    }
  }

  // Merge edge anchors into each referrer's set
  for (const key of referrerMap.keys()) {
    edgeAnchors.forEach((a) => referrerMap.get(key).add(a));
  }

  // Find common anchor: intersection of all referrer sets
  let common = new Set([...referrerMap.get(activeArr[0]) || []]);
  for (let i = 1; i < activeArr.length; i++) {
    const next = referrerMap.get(activeArr[i]) || new Set();
    common = new Set([...common].filter((x) => next.has(x)));
  }

  // Filter out non-existent node IDs from common
  const existingIds = new Set(nodes.map((n) => n.id));
  const validCommon = [...common].filter((id) => existingIds.has(id));

  if (validCommon.length === 1) {
    return { result: "shared_anchor", anchorIds: validCommon, reason: "All active unknowns reference one common node: " + validCommon[0] };
  }

  // No common intersection — collect all referenced existing nodes as anchors
  const allRefs = new Set();
  for (const id of activeArr) {
    const refs = referrerMap.get(id) || new Set();
    refs.forEach((r) => allRefs.add(r));
  }
  const validAnchors = [...allRefs].filter((id) => existingIds.has(id));

  if (validAnchors.length > 0) {
    return { result: "separate_anchors", anchorIds: validAnchors, reason: "Active unknowns reference " + validAnchors.length + " distinct nodes with no shared intersection" };
  }

  // No relationship data at all
  return { result: "insufficient_data", anchorIds: [], reason: "no relationship fields populated on any active unknown" };

  return { result: "insufficient_data", anchorIds: [], reason: "no relationship fields populated on any active unknown" };
}

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Node and edge builder helpers
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

function mkNode(id, label, opts = {}) {
  const kind = opts.kind || "unknown";
  const status = opts.status || (kind === "unknown" ? "unknown" : "known");
  const confidence = opts.confidence || (kind === "unknown" ? "low" : "high");
  return {
    id, label, description: label, kind, status, confidence,
    evidenceIds: [], dependsOn: opts.dependsOn ?? [], affects: opts.affects ?? [],
    parentId: opts.parentId ?? null, childIds: opts.childIds ?? []
  };
}

function mkEdge(id, fromNodeId, toNodeId, relationship) {
  return { id, fromNodeId, toNodeId, relationship: relationship || "supports" };
}

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Fixture A — Shared anchor: all four unknowns depend on one decision node
 * Node count: 6 (1 obs + 1 context + 4 unknowns)
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

function buildFixtureA() {
  const nodes = [
    mkNode("obs-1", "The current service handles approximately 200 requests per day across existing regions", { kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium" }),
    mkNode("ctx-1", "North West region market evaluation in progress", { kind: "state", status: "provisional", confidence: "medium" }),
    mkNode("u-a1", "Whether customer demand exists in the North West region", { dependsOn: ["ctx-1"], affects: ["ctx-1"] }),
    mkNode("u-a2", "What price point the North West market would accept", { dependsOn: ["ctx-1"], affects: ["ctx-1"] }),
    mkNode("u-a3", "Whether delivery infrastructure can support the North West region", { dependsOn: ["ctx-1"], affects: ["ctx-1"] }),
    mkNode("u-a4", "Whether regulatory requirements allow operation in the North West", { dependsOn: ["ctx-1"], affects: ["ctx-1"] })
  ];

  const edges = [
    mkEdge("e-1", "obs-1", "ctx-1", "supports"),
    mkEdge("e-2", "u-a1", "ctx-1", "supports"),
    mkEdge("e-3", "u-a2", "ctx-1", "supports"),
    mkEdge("e-4", "u-a3", "ctx-1", "supports"),
    mkEdge("e-5", "u-a4", "ctx-1", "supports")
  ];

  return {
    situationGraph: {
      centralStatement: "Where should I focus my investigation?",
      currentSummary: "Multiple unknowns related to one decision.",
      nodes, edges, activeUnknownNodeId: "u-a1", resolvedNodeIds: []
    },
    selectedQuestion: null,
    noQuestionReason: "No clear decision target yet.",
    diagnostics: { promptVersion: "v0.4", modelName: "mock-ollama", responseDurationMs: 0, validationStatus: "valid", nodeCount: nodes.length, edgeCount: edges.length, reasoningPattern: null }
  };
}

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Fixture B — Separate anchors: each unknown depends on a different parent
 * Node count: 6 (1 obs + 1 context + 4 unknowns)
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

function buildFixtureB() {
  const nodes = [
    mkNode("obs-1", "The business has been operating for five years without significant growth", { kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium" }),
    mkNode("ctx-1", "Strategic planning review cycle active", { kind: "state", status: "provisional", confidence: "medium" }),
    mkNode("u-b1", "Whether customer demand exists in new geographic markets", { dependsOn: ["ctx-1"] }),
    mkNode("u-b2", "Whether staff conflict is the primary cause of reduced productivity", { parentId: "ctx-1" }),
    mkNode("u-b3", "Whether relocating would attract a different talent pool", { affects: ["ctx-1"] }),
    mkNode("u-b4", "Whether current pricing aligns with competitor offerings")
  ];

  const edges = [mkEdge("e-1", "obs-1", "ctx-1", "supports")];

  return {
    situationGraph: {
      centralStatement: "Where should I focus my investigation?",
      currentSummary: "Multiple unknowns related to one decision.",
      nodes, edges, activeUnknownNodeId: "u-b1", resolvedNodeIds: []
    },
    selectedQuestion: null,
    noQuestionReason: "No clear decision target yet.",
    diagnostics: { promptVersion: "v0.4", modelName: "mock-ollama", responseDurationMs: 0, validationStatus: "valid", nodeCount: nodes.length, edgeCount: edges.length, reasoningPattern: null }
  };
}

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Fixture C — No usable relationships: four unknowns with empty relationship fields
 * Node count: 6 (1 obs + 1 context + 4 unknowns)
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

function buildFixtureC() {
  const nodes = [
    mkNode("obs-1", "A manufacturing company reports complaints increased by 35%", { kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium" }),
    mkNode("ctx-1", "Quality review process initiated", { kind: "state", status: "provisional", confidence: "medium" }),
    mkNode("u-c1", "Whether the complaint increase is sector-wide or product-specific"),
    mkNode("u-c2", "Whether production volume explains the complaint trend"),
    mkNode("u-c3", "Whether quality control procedures are consistently applied"),
    mkNode("u-c4", "Whether reporting standards have changed during the period")
  ];

  return {
    situationGraph: {
      centralStatement: "Where should I focus my investigation?",
      currentSummary: "Multiple unknowns related to one decision.",
      nodes, edges: [], activeUnknownNodeId: "u-c1", resolvedNodeIds: []
    },
    selectedQuestion: null,
    noQuestionReason: "No clear decision target yet.",
    diagnostics: { promptVersion: "v0.4", modelName: "mock-ollama", responseDurationMs: 0, validationStatus: "valid", nodeCount: nodes.length, edgeCount: 0, reasoningPattern: null }
  };
}

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Clarify eligibility helper (matches production rule)
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

function isClarifyEligible(assessment) {
  if (assessment.conversationHealth.value === "too_broad") return true;
  if (assessment.phase.value === "orienting" && assessment.phase.evidence?.observationDensity < 3) return true;
  return false;
}

/* ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 * Tests — Structural equality across fixtures
 * ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ */

describe("Experiment 47 — Shared-Anchor Coherence Diagnostic", () => {

  /* ── Build fixtures once for all tests ── */

  let fixtureA, fixtureB, fixtureC;
  let resultA, resultB, resultC;
  let selA, selB, selC;
  let clarEligibleA, clarEligibleB, clarEligibleC;
  let diagA, diagB, diagC;

  beforeAll(() => {
    fixtureA = buildFixtureA();
    fixtureB = buildFixtureB();
    fixtureC = buildFixtureC();

    resultA = assessInvestigationState(fixtureA);
    resultB = assessInvestigationState(fixtureB);
    resultC = assessInvestigationState(fixtureC);

    selA = selectBehaviour(resultA);
    selB = selectBehaviour(resultB);
    selC = selectBehaviour(resultC);

    clarEligibleA = isClarifyEligible(resultA);
    clarEligibleB = isClarifyEligible(resultB);
    clarEligibleC = isClarifyEligible(resultC);

    diagA = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureA.situationGraph });
    diagB = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureB.situationGraph });
    diagC = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureC.situationGraph });
  });

  /* ═══ Structural equality (identical counts) ═══ */

  describe("Structural equality across fixtures", () => {
    const verifyCounts = (g, name) => {
      const nodes = g.nodes || [];
      const unknowns = nodes.filter((n) => n.kind === "unknown" && n.status !== "resolved");
      const resolved = g.resolvedNodeIds ? g.resolvedNodeIds.filter((id) => nodes.find((n) => n.id === id)) : [];
      const observations = nodes.filter((n) => (n.kind === "observation" && n.status === "known"));

      expect(unknowns.length).toBe(4).withContext(name + ": active unknown count");
      expect(resolved.length).toBe(0).withContext(name + ": resolved count");
      expect(observations.length).toBe(1).withContext(name + ": observation count");
    };

    it("Fixture A: 4 active unknowns, 0 resolved, 1 observation", () => verifyCounts(fixtureA.situationGraph, "A"));
    it("Fixture B: 4 active unknowns, 0 resolved, 1 observation", () => verifyCounts(fixtureB.situationGraph, "B"));
    it("Fixture C: 4 active unknowns, 0 resolved, 1 observation", () => verifyCounts(fixtureC.situationGraph, "C"));

    it("all fixtures have no selected question", () => {
      expect(fixtureA.selectedQuestion).toBeNull();
      expect(fixtureB.selectedQuestion).toBeNull();
      expect(fixtureC.selectedQuestion).toBeNull();
    });

    it("all fixtures use identical confidence and status values per node type", () => {
      for (const [name, fg] of [["A", fixtureA], ["B", fixtureB], ["C", fixtureC]]) {
        const nodes = fg.situationGraph.nodes;
        expect(nodes.filter((n) => n.kind === "unknown").every((n) => n.status === "unknown" && n.confidence === "low")).toBe(true);
        expect(nodes.filter((n) => n.kind === "observation")[0].status).toBe("known");
        expect(nodes.filter((n) => n.kind === "observation")[0].confidence).toBe("medium");
      }
    });

    it("only relationship structure differs between fixtures", () => {
      const countDeps = (fg) => fg.situationGraph.nodes.reduce((sum, n) => sum + (Array.isArray(n.dependsOn) ? n.dependsOn.length : 0), 0);
      expect(countDeps(fixtureA)).toBeGreaterThan(0).withContext("Fixture A has dependency relationships");
      expect(countDeps(fixtureB)).toBeGreaterThan(0).withContext("Fixture B has dependency relationships");
      expect(countDeps(fixtureC)).toBe(0).withContext("Fixture C has no dependency relationships");

      expect(fixtureA.situationGraph.edges.length).toBe(5);
      expect(fixtureB.situationGraph.edges.length).toBe(1);
      expect(fixtureC.situationGraph.edges.length).toBe(0);
    });
  });

  /* ═══ Diagnostic helper tests ═══ */

  describe("Shared-anchor diagnostic", () => {
    it("Fixture A returns shared_anchor", () => {
      expect(diagA.result).toBe("shared_anchor");
      expect(diagA.anchorIds.length).toBe(1);
      expect(diagA.anchorIds[0]).toBe("ctx-1");
    });

    it("Fixture B returns separate_anchors", () => {
      expect(diagB.result).toBe("separate_anchors");
      expect(diagB.anchorIds.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
    });

    it("Fixture C returns insufficient_data", () => {
      expect(diagC.result).toBe("insufficient_data");
      expect(diagC.anchorIds.length).toBe(0);
    });
  });

  /* ═══ Assessor results (existing production logic) ═══ */

  describe("Assessor outputs (production unchanged)", () => {
    it("all fixtures produce the same health result", () => {
      expect(resultA.conversationHealth.value).toBe(resultB.conversationHealth.value);
      expect(resultB.conversationHealth.value).toBe(resultC.conversationHealth.value);
      expect(resultA.conversationHealth.value).toBe("too_broad");
    });

    it("all fixtures produce the same phase result", () => {
      expect(resultA.phase.value).toBe(resultB.phase.value);
      expect(resultB.phase.value).toBe(resultC.phase.value);
      expect(resultA.phase.value).toBe("cannot_determine");
    });

    it("all fixtures produce the same progress result", () => {
      expect(resultA.progress.value).toBe(resultB.progress.value);
      expect(resultB.progress.value).toBe(resultC.progress.value);
      expect(resultA.progress.value).toBe("cannot_determine");
    });

    it("health evidence shows activeUnknownCount = 4 for all", () => {
      expect(resultA.conversationHealth.evidence.activeUnknownCount).toBe(4);
      expect(resultB.conversationHealth.evidence.activeUnknownCount).toBe(4);
      expect(resultC.conversationHealth.evidence.activeUnknownCount).toBe(4);
    });
  });

  /* ═══ Clarify eligibility ═══ */

  describe("Clarify eligibility", () => {
    it("all fixtures make Clarify eligible via too_broad Rule A", () => {
      expect(clarEligibleA).toBe(true);
      expect(clarEligibleB).toBe(true);
      expect(clarEligibleC).toBe(true);
    });

    it("selector behaviour matches Clarify eligibility", () => {
      expect(selA.behaviour).toBe("clarify");
      expect(selB.behaviour).toBe("clarify");
      expect(selC.behaviour).toBe("clarify");
    });
  });

  /* ═══ Key discrimination test ═══ */

  describe("Does the diagnostic distinguish coherent from scattered?", () => {
    it("diagnostic distinguishes Fixture A (shared) from Fixture B (separate)", () => {
      expect(diagA.result).not.toBe(diagB.result);
      expect(diagA.result).toBe("shared_anchor");
      expect(diagB.result).toBe("separate_anchors");
    });

    it("diagnostic distinguishes Fixture C (insufficient) from Fixture A", () => {
      expect(diagC.result).not.toBe(diagA.result);
    });

    it("assessor does NOT distinguish any pair — all identical regardless of graph relationships", () => {
      const copy = (r) => {
        const c = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(r));
        delete c.assessedAt;
        return c;
      };
      expect(JSON.stringify(copy(resultA))).toBe(JSON.stringify(copy(resultB)));
      expect(JSON.stringify(copy(resultB))).toBe(JSON.stringify(copy(resultC)));
    });

    it("the diagnostic result does not affect the assessor output", () => {
      const copy = (r) => {
        const c = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(r));
        delete c.assessedAt;
        return c;
      };
      expect(JSON.stringify(copy(resultA))).not.toContain("shared_anchor");
      expect(JSON.stringify(copy(resultB))).not.toContain("separate_anchors");
    });
  });

  /* ═══ Determinism and immutability ═══ */

  describe("Determinism and immutability", () => {
    it("diagnostic helper is deterministic across multiple calls", () => {
      const d1A = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureA.situationGraph });
      const d2A = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureA.situationGraph });
      expect(d1A.result).toBe(d2A.result);
      expect(JSON.stringify(d1A.anchorIds)).toBe(JSON.stringify(d2A.anchorIds));

      const d1B = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureB.situationGraph });
      const d2B = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureB.situationGraph });
      expect(d1B.result).toBe(d2B.result);

      const d1C = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureC.situationGraph });
      const d2C = inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: fixtureC.situationGraph });
      expect(d1C.result).toBe(d2C.result);
    });

    it("inputs are not mutated by the assessor", () => {
      const aSnap = JSON.stringify(fixtureA);
      const bSnap = JSON.stringify(fixtureB);
      const cSnap = JSON.stringify(fixtureC);
      assessInvestigationState(fixtureA);
      assessInvestigationState(fixtureB);
      assessInvestigationState(fixtureC);
      expect(JSON.stringify(fixtureA)).toBe(aSnap);
      expect(JSON.stringify(fixtureB)).toBe(bSnap);
      expect(JSON.stringify(fixtureC)).toBe(cSnap);
    });

    it("inputs are not mutated by the diagnostic helper", () => {
      const g = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(fixtureA.situationGraph));
      inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: g });
      expect(JSON.stringify(g)).toEqual(JSON.stringify(fixtureA.situationGraph));
    });

    it("fixtures and helper remain test-only", () => { expect(true).toBe(true); });
  });

  /* ═══ Existing scenario inspection ═══ */

  describe("Existing scenarios from Experiments 39-46", () => {
    // Real shapes from existing tests — not rewritten, just inspected
    const existingScenarios = [
      {
        name: "comparison-turn-2 (Exp 39/41/45 real data path)",
        graph: {
          nodes: [
            { id: "obs-1", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-2", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-3", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-4", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-5", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "state-1", kind: "state", status: "provisional", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-1", kind: "unknown", status: "resolved", confidence: "high", dependsOn: ["obs-1"], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-2", kind: "unknown", status: "resolved", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: ["obs-3"], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-3", kind: "unknown", status: "unknown", confidence: "low", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] }
          ],
          edges: [],
          resolvedNodeIds: ["u-1", "u-2"],
        }
      },
      {
        name: "long-turn-3 (Exp 45 real data path)",
        graph: {
          nodes: [
            { id: "obs-1", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-2", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-3", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "obs-4", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "state-1", kind: "state", status: "provisional", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-1", kind: "unknown", status: "resolved", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-2", kind: "unknown", status: "resolved", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-3", kind: "unknown", status: "resolved", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] },
            { id: "u-4", kind: "unknown", status: "unknown", confidence: "low", dependsOn: [], affects: [], parentId: null, childIds: [] }
          ],
          edges: [],
          resolvedNodeIds: ["u-1", "u-2", "u-3"],
        }
      },
      {
        name: "live-ollama-state (Exp 46 test shape)",
        graph: {
          nodes: [
            { id: "obs-1", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "high", dependsOn: [], affects: [] },
            { id: "obs-2", kind: "observation", status: "known", confidence: "medium", dependsOn: [], affects: [] },
            { id: "u-1", kind: "unknown", status: "unknown", confidence: "low", dependsOn: ["obs-1", "obs-2"], affects: [] }
          ],
          edges: [
            { id: "e-1", fromNodeId: "obs-1", toNodeId: "u-1", relationship: "supports" },
            { id: "e-2", fromNodeId: "obs-2", toNodeId: "u-1", relationship: "supports" }
          ],
          resolvedNodeIds: [],
        }
      }
    ];

    let existingResults;
    beforeAll(() => {
      existingResults = existingScenarios.map((s) => inspectSharedUnknownAnchor({ graph: s.graph }));
    });

    it("all existing scenarios return insufficient_data", () => {
      for (const r of existingResults) {
        expect(r.result).toBe("insufficient_data");
      }
    });

    it("diagnostic results for each existing scenario", () => {
      for (const [i, s] of existingScenarios.entries()) {
        console.log("\n=== Existing Scenario: " + s.name + " ===");
        console.log("  result: " + existingResults[i].result);
        console.log("  anchorIds: " + JSON.stringify(existingResults[i].anchorIds));
        console.log("  reason: " + existingResults[i].reason);
      }
    });

    it("none contain a usable shared-anchor signal", () => {
      const hasShared = existingResults.some((r) => r.result === "shared_anchor");
      expect(hasShared).toBe(false);
    });
  });
});