Experiment 13 — Semantic Facilitator Translation - Classify nodes by semantic role (observation, question, explanation, scaffolding, relationship) rather than graph kind. Scaffolding suppressed entirely before section routing. - Three-tier filtering: scaffolding patterns > internal vocabulary > technical summary patterns. Prevents structural noise from contaminating user-facing sections. - Deduplicate by normalised text — merge duplicate observations expressing the same finding. - Route resolved unknowns and assumptions to known section with epistemic labels instead of treating them as unresolved questions. - Prefer concrete observations (numbers, change language, temporal refs) over abstract labels in ranking. - Closed Experiment 12 as confirmed. Added Experiment 13 documentation. - Updated UX guidelines with Semantic Projection principles. - 37 tests: filtering, classification, deduplication, ranking, framing, mock data integration, edge cases.
575 lines
22 KiB
JavaScript
575 lines
22 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* FacilitatorViewAdapter — deterministic projection of the reasoning graph
|
|
* into a concise, human-facing facilitator view (Version C).
|
|
*
|
|
* This adapter is pure and testable. It receives a prepared view model from
|
|
* ReasoningWorkspace and returns a structured display model with up to four
|
|
* primary sections:
|
|
*
|
|
* 1. What we know — supported observations, resolved state nodes
|
|
* 2. Still investigating — unresolved unknowns, active unknown context
|
|
* 3. Possible explanations — assumptions and tentative causal claims
|
|
* 4. Quiet reasoning summary — secondary counts from the same graph
|
|
*
|
|
* Key design: this adapter classifies nodes by *semantic role* rather than
|
|
* simply projecting graph kinds. Internal graph concepts (metrics, systems,
|
|
* scaffolding, technical summaries) are suppressed from the user-facing view.
|
|
* Translation quality matters more than layout completeness.
|
|
*
|
|
* All filtering, deduplication and ranking is deterministic and uses only
|
|
* existing graph fields. No new backend data or API contracts are required.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* ── Normalisation helpers ─────────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Normalise a string for deduplication comparison.
|
|
* Lowercase, trim, remove punctuation, collapse whitespace.
|
|
*/
|
|
function normaliseText(text) {
|
|
if (!text || typeof text !== "string") return "";
|
|
return text
|
|
.toLowerCase()
|
|
.replace(/[^\w\s]/g, "")
|
|
.replace(/\s+/g, " ")
|
|
.trim();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Remove repeated boilerplate prefixes that add no meaning.
|
|
*/
|
|
function stripBoilerplate(text) {
|
|
if (!text || typeof text !== "string") return text;
|
|
const result = text.replace(/^need evidence about\s*/i, "").trim();
|
|
return result || null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Determine whether text is too long to scan usefully.
|
|
*/
|
|
function isTooLong(text, maxChars) {
|
|
if (!text) return false;
|
|
if (maxChars === undefined) maxChars = 280;
|
|
return text.length > maxChars;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ── Filtering helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
// Patterns that flag content as likely technical or boilerplate summary text.
|
|
const TECHNICAL_SUMMARY_PATTERNS = [
|
|
/\bnodes?\s*[:\d]/i,
|
|
/\bedges?\s*[:\d]/i,
|
|
/\bsorted\s*/i,
|
|
/by_kind/i,
|
|
/\b(?:node|edge|unknown|state)\s+count/i,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// Patterns that flag content as scaffolding — structural glue the user does not need to see.
|
|
const SCAFFOLDING_PATTERNS = [
|
|
// Scenario summaries and setup descriptions
|
|
/\bsummary\s*of\s*(?:scenario|situation|problem|context|background)\b/i,
|
|
/(?:^|\s)summary\s*[:\.]?\s*/i,
|
|
// Process labels — the user cares about findings, not processes
|
|
/\b(?:process|approach|workflow|methodology|procedure)\s+describes?\b/i,
|
|
// System/tool references that are implementation details
|
|
/\b(?:system|tool|platform|interface|framework|engine|library|component)\s+(?:for|that|which|used|providing|supporting)\b/i,
|
|
/(?:logging|measurement|reporting|tracking|monitoring)\s+(?:system|tool|mechanism|framework|approach)\b/i,
|
|
// Metric object descriptions (the metric itself is fine; describing the *object* is not)
|
|
/\b(?:metric|measure|indicator|KPI)\s+describes?\b/i,
|
|
/\b(?:metric|measure|indicator)\s+(?:captures?|tracks?|quantifies?|represents?)\b/i,
|
|
// Graph artefacts — nodes describing themselves or other graph elements
|
|
/(?:graph|diagram|visualization)\s+(?:showing|depicting|illustrating|displaying)\b/i,
|
|
/\bnodes?\s*representing?\b/i,
|
|
// "Current situation" type labels that are pure scaffolding
|
|
/\b(?:current\s+)?(?:situation|state|scenario|context)\b.*\b(describes?|is|represents?|shows)\b/i,
|
|
// Vague state-of-play descriptions
|
|
/\b(?:is\s+(?:a\s+)?(?:situation|case|scenario|context|problem))\b/i,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// Patterns that flag content as implementation/technical vocabulary the user should not see.
|
|
const INTERNAL_VOCAB_PATTERNS = [
|
|
// Technical summary language
|
|
/\b(?:total|overall)\s+(?:count|number|figure)\s+of\b/i,
|
|
/(?:complaint|incident|issue)\s+logging\s+(?:system|tool|mechanism|process)\b/i,
|
|
/(?:performance|quality|production)\s+(?:measurement|monitoring)\s+(?:tools?|systems?)\b/i,
|
|
// "Scaffolding" kind of description masquerading as content
|
|
/\b(?:summary|overview|background\s+context)\s+of\b/i,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Decide whether a raw graph text item should be included in the panel.
|
|
* Returns { included, displayText, reason } where reason is null when accepted.
|
|
*/
|
|
function filterItem(raw) {
|
|
const label = raw.label;
|
|
const description = raw.description;
|
|
const kind = raw.kind;
|
|
|
|
// Extract display text — prefer whichever sounds most natural for human reading.
|
|
let text;
|
|
if (description && typeof description === "string" && description.trim()) {
|
|
// Prefer the longer, more informative text.
|
|
if (description !== label) {
|
|
text = description;
|
|
} else {
|
|
text = label;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
text = label || "";
|
|
}
|
|
if (!text || typeof text !== "string") return { included: false, reason: "empty" };
|
|
|
|
const trimmed = text.trim();
|
|
if (!trimmed) return { included: false, reason: "empty" };
|
|
|
|
// ── Scaffolding suppression (priority over technical summary) ──
|
|
for (var i = 0; i < SCAFFOLDING_PATTERNS.length; i++) {
|
|
if (SCAFFOLDING_PATTERNS[i].test(trimmed)) return { included: false, reason: "scaffolding" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Internal vocabulary suppression ──
|
|
for (var j = 0; j < INTERNAL_VOCAB_PATTERNS.length; j++) {
|
|
if (INTERNAL_VOCAB_PATTERNS[j].test(trimmed)) return { included: false, reason: "internal-vocab" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Technical summary suppression (existing) ──
|
|
for (var k = 0; k < TECHNICAL_SUMMARY_PATTERNS.length; k++) {
|
|
if (TECHNICAL_SUMMARY_PATTERNS[k].test(trimmed)) return { included: false, reason: "technical" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Skip internal IDs — items whose text is just an ID or contains only one
|
|
if (/^[a-z0-9-]{1,40}$/i.test(trimmed) && trimmed.length < 60) {
|
|
return { included: false, reason: "internal-id" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Depriorise items that are too long to scan usefully.
|
|
// The adapter does not synthesise rewritten claims from verbose text.
|
|
if (isTooLong(trimmed)) return { included: false, reason: "too-long" };
|
|
|
|
return { included: true, displayText: trimmed, sourceKind: kind };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ── Node collection helpers ───────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Determine whether a node is resolved (explicitly closed).
|
|
*/
|
|
function isResolved(node, resolvedIds) {
|
|
return resolvedIds.has(node.id) || node.status === "resolved";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Determine whether this node is the active unknown target.
|
|
*/
|
|
function isActiveUnknown(node, activeUnknownNodeId) {
|
|
return node.id === activeUnknownNodeId;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Determine whether a node's content represents established knowledge
|
|
* (regardless of explicit resolution). Used for routing in Phase 1.
|
|
* A kind=observation with status known is always an established observation.
|
|
*/
|
|
function isEstablished(node, resolvedIds) {
|
|
if (node.kind === "observation" && node.status === "known") return true;
|
|
// Already resolved nodes are also established (by ID or by status)
|
|
if (resolvedIds.has(node.id)) return true;
|
|
if (node.status === "resolved") return true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ── Semantic role classification ──────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Classify a node by its semantic role in the investigation rather than its graph kind.
|
|
* Returns one of: "observation", "question", "explanation", "scaffolding", "relationship".
|
|
*
|
|
* This allows the adapter to route content based on *meaning* rather than *type*.
|
|
* A node that says "Complaints increased by 35%" is an observation regardless of kind.
|
|
* A node whose only value is describing a process or summarising the scenario is scaffolding.
|
|
*/
|
|
function classifySemanticRole(node, resolvedIds) {
|
|
var text = (node.description || node.label || "").trim().toLowerCase();
|
|
var kind = node.kind;
|
|
|
|
// If filterItem rejected it as scaffolding/internal-vocab, treat it as scaffolding here too
|
|
var filtered = filterItem(node);
|
|
if (!filtered.included) {
|
|
return "scaffolding";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check resolved/established first for semantic routing.
|
|
// A resolved unknown or assumption is still a question/explanation in origin,
|
|
// but its content is now known. We return "observation" here so that Phase 1
|
|
// routing places it in the known section rather than investigating.
|
|
if (resolvedIds && isEstablished(node, resolvedIds)) {
|
|
return kind === "relationship" ? "relationship" : "observation";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (kind === "observation") return "observation";
|
|
if (kind === "unknown") return "question";
|
|
if (kind === "assumption") return "explanation";
|
|
if (kind === "relationship") return "relationship";
|
|
|
|
// kind === "state" or "metric" — need to look at content
|
|
var isConcrete = !!(
|
|
/\b\d+/.test(text) || // contains numbers
|
|
/\b(?:increased|decreased|rose|fell|changed|improved|worsened)\b/i.test(text) || // contains change language
|
|
/\b(?:per|from |to |across|during|over\s+\d)/i.test(text) || // temporal/quantitative
|
|
/\b(?:about|approximately|around|roughly|exactly)\b/i.test(text) ||
|
|
/^\d/.test(text) // starts with a digit
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
var isProcess = /describes?\s+(?:the\s+)?(?:current\s+)?(?:situation|state|scenario|problem|context)/i.test(text);
|
|
var isSummary = /^summary/i.test(text) || /^(is\s+a\s+)?(situation|case|scenario|context)\b/i.test(text);
|
|
|
|
if (isConcrete) return "observation";
|
|
if (isProcess || isSummary) return "scaffolding";
|
|
|
|
// Default: if it looks like a question or explanation from context, honour that.
|
|
if (/\?$/.test(node.label || "")) return "question";
|
|
return "scaffolding";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ── Core adapter function ─────────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Build a Version C facilitator view model from graph data.
|
|
*
|
|
* @param {Object} params
|
|
* @param {Array<Object>} params.nodes — graph nodes
|
|
* @param {Set<string>} params.resolvedIds — resolved node IDs
|
|
* @param {string|null} params.activeUnknownNodeId — ID of the active unknown
|
|
* @param {Array<Object>} [params.edges=[]] — graph edges
|
|
* @param {Object|null} [params.selectedQuestion=null] — current question object
|
|
* @returns {Object} viewModel with sections: known, stillInvestigating, possibleExplanations, summaryCounts
|
|
*/
|
|
export function buildFacilitatorViewModel(_ref) {
|
|
var nodes = _ref.nodes;
|
|
var resolvedIds = _ref.resolvedIds;
|
|
var activeUnknownNodeId = _ref.activeUnknownNodeId;
|
|
var edges = _ref.edges;
|
|
var selectedQuestion = _ref.selectedQuestion;
|
|
|
|
if (!nodes) nodes = [];
|
|
if (!resolvedIds) resolvedIds = new Set();
|
|
if (activeUnknownNodeId === undefined || activeUnknownNodeId === null) activeUnknownNodeId = null;
|
|
if (!edges) edges = [];
|
|
if (!selectedQuestion) selectedQuestion = null;
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 1: Categorise all nodes by semantic role ──────────
|
|
var known = [];
|
|
var stillInvestigating = [];
|
|
var possibleExplanations = [];
|
|
|
|
for (var _i = 0; _i < nodes.length; _i++) {
|
|
var node = nodes[_i];
|
|
var resolved = isResolved(node, resolvedIds);
|
|
var established = isEstablished(node, resolvedIds);
|
|
var semanticRole = classifySemanticRole(node, resolvedIds);
|
|
var displayResult = filterItem(node);
|
|
|
|
if (!displayResult.included) continue;
|
|
|
|
// Scaffold items are entirely suppressed from user-facing sections.
|
|
if (semanticRole === "scaffolding") continue;
|
|
|
|
var entry = {
|
|
text: displayResult.displayText,
|
|
normalised: normaliseText(displayResult.displayText),
|
|
kind: node.kind,
|
|
semanticRole: semanticRole,
|
|
confidence: node.confidence || null,
|
|
isResolved: resolved,
|
|
isActiveUnknown: isActiveUnknown(node, activeUnknownNodeId),
|
|
evidenceIds: node.evidenceIds || [],
|
|
relevance: node.relevance != null ? node.relevance : null,
|
|
priority: node.priority != null ? node.priority : null,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// ── Established content goes to "known" ──
|
|
if (established) {
|
|
known.push(entry);
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Unresolved content routing by semantic role ──
|
|
switch (semanticRole) {
|
|
case "question":
|
|
stillInvestigating.push(entry);
|
|
break;
|
|
case "explanation":
|
|
possibleExplanations.push(entry);
|
|
break;
|
|
case "observation":
|
|
// Unresolved observations are uncertain — put in investigating.
|
|
stillInvestigating.push(entry);
|
|
break;
|
|
case "relationship":
|
|
known.push(entry);
|
|
break;
|
|
default:
|
|
stillInvestigating.push(entry);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 2: Deduplicate by normalised text ─────────────────
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Deduplicate entries within a single list.
|
|
* First occurrence wins; if a later entry has a higher-priority kind, replace it.
|
|
*/
|
|
function deduplicate(entries) {
|
|
var seen = {}; // normalised → first entry
|
|
return entries.filter(function (entry) {
|
|
var key = entry.normalised;
|
|
if (!key || !seen.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
|
|
seen[key] = entry;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
// If already seen, prefer the one with a more specific kind order:
|
|
// observation > unknown > assumption > state > metric
|
|
var priorityOrder = ["observation", "unknown", "assumption", "state", "metric"];
|
|
var existingKindIdx = priorityOrder.indexOf(seen[key].kind);
|
|
var newKindIdx = priorityOrder.indexOf(entry.kind);
|
|
if (newKindIdx < existingKindIdx) {
|
|
seen[key] = entry;
|
|
return true; // replace with this one
|
|
}
|
|
return false; // skip — earlier winner stays
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Apply deduplication within each section independently
|
|
var knownDedup = deduplicate(known);
|
|
var unknownDedup = deduplicate(stillInvestigating);
|
|
var assumptionDedup = deduplicate(possibleExplanations);
|
|
|
|
// Cross-deduplicate: if "known" and "stillInvestigating" share normalised text,
|
|
// move the item to stillInvestigating (uncertainty wins).
|
|
var knownFinal = knownDedup;
|
|
var stillInvestigatingFinal = unknownDedup;
|
|
|
|
if (knownDedup.length > 0 && unknownDedup.length > 0) {
|
|
var knownTexts = {};
|
|
for (var _j = 0; _j < unknownDedup.length; _j++) {
|
|
knownTexts[unknownDedup[_j].normalised] = true;
|
|
}
|
|
knownFinal = knownDedup.filter(function (e) { return !knownTexts[e.normalised]; });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 3: Rank items within each section ─────────────────
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Rank known items.
|
|
* Order: observations > questions/resolved unknowns > explanations/resolved assumptions > relationships > other.
|
|
* Within each group: high-confidence > medium > low > concise.
|
|
*/
|
|
function rankKnown(items) {
|
|
var confidenceRank = {};
|
|
confidenceRank["high"] = 0;
|
|
confidenceRank["medium"] = 1;
|
|
confidenceRank["low"] = 2;
|
|
confidenceRank["null"] = 3;
|
|
|
|
var rolePriority = {};
|
|
rolePriority["observation"] = 0;
|
|
rolePriority["question"] = 1;
|
|
rolePriority["explanation"] = 2;
|
|
rolePriority["relationship"] = 3;
|
|
rolePriority["scaffolding"] = 4;
|
|
|
|
return items.slice().sort(function (a, b) {
|
|
// Prefer semantic observations first
|
|
var ra = rolePriority[a.semanticRole] != null ? rolePriority[a.semanticRole] : 4;
|
|
var rb = rolePriority[b.semanticRole] != null ? rolePriority[b.semanticRole] : 4;
|
|
if (ra !== rb) return ra - rb;
|
|
|
|
// Then by confidence
|
|
var ca = confidenceRank[a.confidence] != null ? confidenceRank[a.confidence] : 3;
|
|
var cb = confidenceRank[b.confidence] != null ? confidenceRank[b.confidence] : 3;
|
|
if (ca !== cb) return ca - cb;
|
|
|
|
// Prefer concise items
|
|
if (a.text.length !== b.text.length) return a.text.length - b.text.length;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Rank still-investigating items.
|
|
* Order: active unknown > selected-question target > explicit priority > evidence-linked > concise > remaining.
|
|
*/
|
|
function rankUnknowns(items) {
|
|
var sqText = selectedQuestion && selectedQuestion.question ? normaliseText(selectedQuestion.question) : null;
|
|
|
|
return items.slice().sort(function (a, b) {
|
|
// Active unknown always first
|
|
if (a.isActiveUnknown && !b.isActiveUnknown) return -1;
|
|
if (!a.isActiveUnknown && b.isActiveUnknown) return 1;
|
|
|
|
// Selected-question target: match by normalised text
|
|
if (sqText && a.normalised === sqText && b.normalised !== sqText) return -1;
|
|
if (sqText && a.normalised !== sqText && b.normalised === sqText) return 1;
|
|
|
|
// Explicit priority fields where available in the graph
|
|
var pa = a.priority != null ? a.priority : null;
|
|
var pb = b.priority != null ? b.priority : null;
|
|
if (pa != null && pb != null && pa !== pb) return pa - pb;
|
|
|
|
// Prefer items linked to supported observations (has evidenceIds)
|
|
var ae = a.evidenceIds ? a.evidenceIds.length : 0;
|
|
var be = b.evidenceIds ? b.evidenceIds.length : 0;
|
|
if (ae > be) return -1;
|
|
if (be > ae) return 1;
|
|
|
|
// Prefer concise items (shorter labels are more scannable)
|
|
if (a.text.length !== b.text.length) return a.text.length - b.text.length;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Rank possible explanation items.
|
|
* Order: assumptions linked to supported observations > related to active unknown > concise > remaining.
|
|
* Fallback ordering is by length (concise first), then kind preference.
|
|
*/
|
|
function rankAssumptions(items) {
|
|
return items.slice().sort(function (a, b) {
|
|
// Prefer assumptions with evidence linkage
|
|
var ae = a.evidenceIds ? a.evidenceIds.length : 0;
|
|
var be = b.evidenceIds ? b.evidenceIds.length : 0;
|
|
if (ae > be) return -1;
|
|
if (be > ae) return 1;
|
|
|
|
// Then by length (concise first)
|
|
if (a.text.length !== b.text.length) return a.text.length - b.text.length;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var rankedKnown = rankKnown(knownFinal);
|
|
var rankedUnknowns = rankUnknowns(stillInvestigatingFinal);
|
|
var rankedAssumptions = rankAssumptions(assumptionDedup);
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 4: Apply display limits ────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
var MAX_KNOWN = 4;
|
|
var MAX_INVESTIGATING = 4;
|
|
var MAX_EXPLANATIONS = 3;
|
|
|
|
var knownDisplay = rankedKnown.slice(0, MAX_KNOWN);
|
|
var investigatingDisplay = rankedUnknowns.slice(0, MAX_INVESTIGATING);
|
|
var explanationsDisplay = rankedAssumptions.slice(0, MAX_EXPLANATIONS);
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 5: Build display model ─────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
function toItemDisplay(entry) {
|
|
return entry.text;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Determine section titles based on investigation state
|
|
var hasUnresolvedUnknowns = investigatingDisplay.some(function (e) { return e.kind === "unknown"; });
|
|
|
|
var knownSectionTitle = "What we know";
|
|
var isTerminal = !selectedQuestion && nodes.length > 0;
|
|
|
|
if (isTerminal) {
|
|
knownSectionTitle = "What the evidence supports";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var investigatingSectionTitle = "Still investigating";
|
|
if (isTerminal && hasUnresolvedUnknowns) {
|
|
investigatingSectionTitle = "Remaining cautions";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 6: Compute quiet summary counts ────────────────────
|
|
// Count all items from the graph (including resolved), displayed as plain-language labels.
|
|
|
|
var totalObservations = 0;
|
|
for (var _k = 0; _k < nodes.length; _k++) {
|
|
if (nodes[_k].kind === "observation" && filterItem(nodes[_k]).included) {
|
|
totalObservations++;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var unresolvedUnknownsCount = 0;
|
|
for (var _l = 0; _l < nodes.length; _l++) {
|
|
if (nodes[_l].kind === "unknown" && !isResolved(nodes[_l], resolvedIds)) {
|
|
unresolvedUnknownsCount++;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var unresolvedAssumptionsCount = 0;
|
|
for (var _m = 0; _m < nodes.length; _m++) {
|
|
if (nodes[_m].kind === "assumption" && !isResolved(nodes[_m], resolvedIds)) {
|
|
unresolvedAssumptionsCount++;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var relationshipsCount = edges ? edges.length : 0;
|
|
|
|
// Build plain-language label string — only include non-zero counts.
|
|
var summaryParts = [];
|
|
if (totalObservations > 0) {
|
|
summaryParts.push(totalObservations + " observation" + (totalObservations !== 1 ? "s" : ""));
|
|
}
|
|
if (unresolvedUnknownsCount > 0) {
|
|
summaryParts.push(unresolvedUnknownsCount + " open question" + (unresolvedUnknownsCount !== 1 ? "s" : ""));
|
|
}
|
|
if (unresolvedAssumptionsCount > 0) {
|
|
summaryParts.push(unresolvedAssumptionsCount + " assumption" + (unresolvedAssumptionsCount !== 1 ? "s" : ""));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Phase 7: Determine terminal framing for investigating section ──
|
|
|
|
var investigatingSectionHasItems = false;
|
|
if (!isTerminal) {
|
|
investigatingSectionHasItems = investigatingDisplay.length > 0;
|
|
} else {
|
|
investigatingSectionHasItems = hasUnresolvedUnknowns || explanationsDisplay.length > 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
known: {
|
|
title: knownSectionTitle,
|
|
items: knownDisplay.map(toItemDisplay),
|
|
hasItems: knownDisplay.length > 0,
|
|
},
|
|
investigating: {
|
|
title: investigatingSectionTitle,
|
|
items: investigatingDisplay.map(toItemDisplay),
|
|
hasItems: investigatingSectionHasItems,
|
|
// Flag for the component to know whether to omit this section entirely.
|
|
shouldOmit: isTerminal && !hasUnresolvedUnknowns && explanationsDisplay.length === 0,
|
|
},
|
|
explanations: {
|
|
title: "Possible explanations",
|
|
items: explanationsDisplay.map(function (entry) {
|
|
return {
|
|
text: entry.text,
|
|
// Structural uncertainty label — never depends on colour.
|
|
label: entry.evidenceIds && entry.evidenceIds.length > 0 ? "To be tested" : "Not yet established",
|
|
};
|
|
}),
|
|
hasItems: explanationsDisplay.length > 0,
|
|
},
|
|
summary: {
|
|
text: summaryParts.length > 0 ? summaryParts.join(" · ") : null,
|
|
},
|
|
_meta: {
|
|
isTerminal: isTerminal,
|
|
hasUnresolvedUnknowns: hasUnresolvedUnknowns,
|
|
totalObservations: totalObservations,
|
|
unresolvedUnknownsCount: unresolvedUnknownsCount,
|
|
unresolvedAssumptionsCount: unresolvedAssumptionsCount,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export default buildFacilitatorViewModel;
|
|
|