455 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
455 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
filterEligibleFindings,
|
|
buildSynthesisPrompt,
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding,
|
|
validateSynthesisResponse,
|
|
} from "@/lib/graph/current-understanding-synthesis.js";
|
|
|
|
// ── Fixtures ────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
const canonicalGraph = {
|
|
centralStatement: "Revenue dropped 30% in Q2 due to supply chain disruption.",
|
|
nodes: [
|
|
{ id: "n1", proposition: "Q1 revenue was stable", description: "Baseline metric", status: "confirmed", confidence: 0.95 },
|
|
{ id: "n2", proposition: "Supplier A failed deliveries in May", description: "Primary cause", status: "active", confidence: 0.85 },
|
|
{ id: "n3", proposition: "Customer churn increased by 12%", description: "Secondary effect", status: "active", confidence: 0.7 },
|
|
],
|
|
edges: [
|
|
{ from: "n2", to: "n3", type: "causal", context: "Supply failure led to customer dissatisfaction" },
|
|
{ from: "n1", to: "n2", type: "temporal", context: "Preceding event in causal chain" },
|
|
],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const makeFinding = (overrides = {}) => ({
|
|
id: `find-${Date.now()}-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 8)}`,
|
|
proposition: "Supplier delays caused production halts",
|
|
evaluation: "considered",
|
|
userDisposition: null,
|
|
sourceObservation: "obs-1",
|
|
contributionId: "contrib-001",
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Fake provider factory for tests — always has generateReconstruction
|
|
// If defaultResponse is passed, use it; otherwise default to success.
|
|
const makeFakeProvider = (defaultResponse) => ({
|
|
generateReconstruction: vi.fn(async () => {
|
|
return typeof defaultResponse === "function"
|
|
? defaultResponse()
|
|
: JSON.stringify({ currentUnderstanding: "Synthesized output" });
|
|
}),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Eligibility tests ───────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("filterEligibleFindings — eligibility contract", () => {
|
|
it("includes null disposition → eligible", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: null })];
|
|
const result = filterEligibleFindings(findings);
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(result[0].userDisposition).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("includes agree disposition → eligible", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree" })];
|
|
const result = filterEligibleFindings(findings);
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(result[0].userDisposition).toBe("agree");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes not_quite disposition → ineligible", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_quite" })];
|
|
const result = filterEligibleFindings(findings);
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes not_relevant disposition → ineligible", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_relevant" })];
|
|
const result = filterEligibleFindings(findings);
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes rejected evaluation → excluded", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ evaluation: "rejected" })];
|
|
const result = filterEligibleFindings(findings);
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("mixed dispositions — only eligible pass through", () => {
|
|
const findings = [
|
|
makeFinding({ userDisposition: null, id: "f1" }),
|
|
makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree", id: "f2" }),
|
|
makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_quite", id: "f3" }),
|
|
makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_relevant", id: "f4" }),
|
|
makeFinding({ evaluation: "rejected", id: "f5" }),
|
|
];
|
|
const result = filterEligibleFindings(findings);
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(result.map((f) => f.id)).toEqual(["f1", "f2"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("null input returns empty array", () => {
|
|
expect(filterEligibleFindings(null)).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(filterEligibleFindings(undefined)).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(filterEligibleFindings([])).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Prompt content tests ────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("buildSynthesisPrompt — full graph input", () => {
|
|
it("includes full canonical graph: nodes, edges, centralStatement (not just centralStatement)", () => {
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, []);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Canonical Situation Graph");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Revenue dropped 30%");
|
|
|
|
// Verify nodes are included with content beyond centralStatement
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain('Node(n1)');
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Q1 revenue was stable");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain('Node(n2)');
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Supplier A failed deliveries in May");
|
|
|
|
// Verify edges are included
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Edge(n2 → n3");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("causal");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Edge(n1 → n2");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("temporal");
|
|
|
|
// Verify centralStatement value is present (not just the key name)
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("supply chain disruption");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("includes eligible Finding propositions in prompt", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree" })];
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, findings);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Supplier delays caused production halts");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes non-eligible Finding propositions from prompt", () => {
|
|
const ineligibleFindings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_quite" })];
|
|
const eligibleFindings = filterEligibleFindings(ineligibleFindings);
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, eligibleFindings);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Eligible Findings");
|
|
// The excluded proposition must not appear because eligible findings is empty
|
|
expect(eligibleFindings).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("includes provisional (null disposition) findings", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: null })];
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, findings);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Provisional Findings");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Supplier delays caused production halts");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("includes confirmed (agree) findings", () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree" })];
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, findings);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Confirmed Evidence");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("handles zero eligible Findings — synthesis still proceeds from graph alone", () => {
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, []);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("(none)");
|
|
// Must still contain graph content
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Canonical Situation Graph");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("prompt contains fresh-synthesis instructions (not append semantics)", () => {
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, []);
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("FRESH synthesis");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Do NOT treat any previous Current Understanding as input");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Do NOT append to prior summaries");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("prompt does NOT request graph mutations or Finding mutations", () => {
|
|
const prompt = buildSynthesisPrompt(canonicalGraph, []);
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toMatch(/change\s+selectedQuestion/i);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Output validation tests ─────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("validateSynthesisResponse", () => {
|
|
it("accepts valid narrative JSON object", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse({ currentUnderstanding: "The data shows X" });
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.currentUnderstanding).toBe("The data shows X");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts valid narrative JSON string", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse('{"currentUnderstanding": "parsed"}');
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.currentUnderstanding).toBe("parsed");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects missing currentUnderstanding field", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse({ summary: "wrong field" });
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects empty string narrative", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse({ currentUnderstanding: "" });
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects malformed JSON string", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse("not json at all [[[");
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects null input", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse(null);
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects undefined input", () => {
|
|
const result = validateSynthesisResponse(undefined);
|
|
expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Domain function tests ───────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe("synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding — full seam", () => {
|
|
it("null disposition finding → included in synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
const result = await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [makeFinding({ userDisposition: null })] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.currentUnderstanding).toBe("Synthesized output");
|
|
expect(fake.generateReconstruction).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
const prompt = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][0];
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Supplier delays caused production halts");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("agree disposition finding → included in synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
const result = await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree" })] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.currentUnderstanding).toBe("Synthesized output");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("not_quite disposition finding → excluded from synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
const result = await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_quite" })] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.currentUnderstanding).toBe("Synthesized output");
|
|
const prompt = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][0];
|
|
// The not_quite proposition must NOT appear because it was excluded by eligibility
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("(none)");
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("Supplier delays caused production halts");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("not_relevant disposition finding → excluded from synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "not_relevant" })] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
const prompt = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][0];
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("(none)");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejected evaluation → excluded from synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [makeFinding({ evaluation: "rejected" })] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
const prompt = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][0];
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("(none)");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("zero eligible Findings → synthesis succeeds from graph alone", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
const result = await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result.currentUnderstanding).toBe("Synthesized output");
|
|
const prompt = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][0];
|
|
// Must still contain graph content
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Canonical Situation Graph");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Node(n1)");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fake provider returns valid narrative → { currentUnderstanding }", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
const result = await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree" })] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({ currentUnderstanding: "Synthesized output" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fake provider returns empty narrative → rejected", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider(async () => JSON.stringify({ currentUnderstanding: "" }));
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
)
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/Synthesis validation failed/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fake provider returns malformed JSON → rejected", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider(async () => "{ not valid json");
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
)
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/Synthesis validation failed/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("fake provider returns object without currentUnderstanding → rejected", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider(async () => JSON.stringify({ wrongField: "value" }));
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
)
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/Synthesis validation failed/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Immutability tests ────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
it("graph structurally unchanged after synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const graphSnapshot = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(canonicalGraph));
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
|
|
await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(canonicalGraph)).toBe(JSON.stringify(graphSnapshot));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("findings structurally unchanged after synthesis", async () => {
|
|
const findings = [makeFinding({ userDisposition: "agree" })];
|
|
const findingsSnapshot = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(findings));
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
|
|
await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(findings)).toBe(JSON.stringify(findingsSnapshot));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Input validation tests ────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
it("missing situationGraph → throws 400", async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding({}, { provider: makeFakeProvider() })
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/situationGraph is required/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("non-object situationGraph → throws 400", async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding({ situationGraph: "not an object" }, { provider: makeFakeProvider() })
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/situationGraph is required/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("findings as non-array → throws 400", async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding({ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: "string" }, { provider: makeFakeProvider() })
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/findings must be an array/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("provider generateReconstruction throws → statusCode 502", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider(async () => { throw new Error("provider down"); });
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
)
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/Synthesis provider call failed|provider down/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("no provider provided — falls through to getProvider() which needs env vars", async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{}
|
|
)
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/OLLAMA_BASE_URL/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ── Configured model resolution ──────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
it("default synthesis path resolves configured modelName — provider receives non-null", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
|
|
// Stub the configured model so test does not depend on dev-machine .env.local
|
|
const savedModel = process.env.OLLAMA_MODEL;
|
|
process.env.OLLAMA_MODEL = "configured-model-v0.50";
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const result = await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(result.currentUnderstanding).toBe("Synthesized output");
|
|
|
|
// KEY ASSERTION: configured model must flow to provider
|
|
const receivedModel = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][1];
|
|
expect(receivedModel).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(receivedModel).not.toBeNull();
|
|
expect(typeof receivedModel).toBe("string");
|
|
expect(receivedModel.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
// Restore original env value (may be undefined)
|
|
if (savedModel == null) {
|
|
delete process.env.OLLAMA_MODEL;
|
|
} else {
|
|
process.env.OLLAMA_MODEL = savedModel;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("explicit modelName dependency overrides default — provider receives injected model", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake, modelName: "test-model-v0.50" }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][1]).toBe("test-model-v0.50");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── Provider sees full graph, not just centralStatement ───
|
|
|
|
it("provider receives full canonical graph content (nodes + edges + centralStatement)", async () => {
|
|
const fake = makeFakeProvider();
|
|
await synthesizeCurrentUnderstanding(
|
|
{ situationGraph: canonicalGraph, findings: [] },
|
|
{ provider: fake }
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const prompt = fake.generateReconstruction.mock.calls[0][0];
|
|
// Must contain node content (not just centralStatement)
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Node(n1)");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Q1 revenue was stable");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Node(n2)");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Supplier A failed deliveries in May");
|
|
// Must contain edge content
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Edge(n2 → n3");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("causal");
|
|
// Must contain centralStatement value
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Revenue dropped 30%");
|
|
// Must instruct about fresh synthesis (not previous CU)
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Do NOT treat any previous Current Understanding as input");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|