521 lines
20 KiB
JavaScript
521 lines
20 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* Experiment 22 — Tests for assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions.
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates the new classifier against explicit decision conditions.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions } from "@/lib/graph/question-decision-conditions.js";
|
|
import { assessQuestionRelevanceToDecision } from "@/lib/graph/question-decision-relevance.js";
|
|
import { buildScenarioFixture } from "@/lib/mocks/scenarios.js";
|
|
|
|
/* ── Helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
const DECISION_TARGET = "Should we enter the European market with our SaaS analytics platform?";
|
|
|
|
const CONDITIONS = [
|
|
"Credible customer demand exists in Europe",
|
|
"European compliance is achievable",
|
|
"The expected market value justifies the cost of entry",
|
|
"The product offers sufficient competitive differentiation",
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
function makeUnknown(id, label) {
|
|
return {
|
|
id,
|
|
label: label || `Unknown ${id}`,
|
|
description: label || `Unknown ${id}`,
|
|
kind: "unknown",
|
|
status: "unknown",
|
|
confidence: "low",
|
|
value: null,
|
|
unit: null,
|
|
evidenceIds: [],
|
|
dependsOn: [],
|
|
affects: [],
|
|
childIds: [],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function makeGraphFor(nodes) {
|
|
return {
|
|
nodes,
|
|
edges: [],
|
|
resolvedNodeIds: [],
|
|
activeUnknownNodeId: null,
|
|
centralStatement: "Test",
|
|
currentSummary: "Test",
|
|
reasoningState: null,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ── tests_deciding_condition ─────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
it("classifies a demand question as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("d1", "Whether there is genuine demand for our category in Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
expect(result.matchedCondition).toContain("demand");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("classifies a compliance question as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("d2", "Whether our product is suitable for European compliance requirements"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
expect(result.matchedCondition).toContain("compliance");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("classifies a competitive differentiation question as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("d3", "Whether we have competitive differentiation against existing European players"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
expect(result.matchedCondition).toContain("differentiation");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("classifies a value justification question as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("d4", "Whether the expected market value justifies the compliance investment"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
expect(result.matchedCondition).toContain("value");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── adds_supporting_evidence ────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — adds_supporting_evidence", () => {
|
|
it("classifies a customer segment question as adds_supporting_evidence", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("s1", "Which European countries should we target first"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("adds_supporting_evidence");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("classifies an investment detail question as adds_supporting_evidence", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("s2", "How should we structure the European subsidiary"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("adds_supporting_evidence");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── outside_decision_conditions ─────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — outside_decision_conditions", () => {
|
|
it("classifies a background question as outside_decision_conditions", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("o1", "What is the company's current US headquarters location"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("outside_decision_conditions");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("classifies an unrelated observation as outside_decision_conditions", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("o2", "Our CEO's previous experience in Asian markets"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("outside_decision_conditions");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── Multiple condition matches ──────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — multiple conditions matched", () => {
|
|
it("returns the first matching condition when a question spans two conditions", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("m1", "What market demand and compliance requirements exist in Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
// First condition that matches should be returned
|
|
expect(result.matchedCondition).toContain("demand");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("treats tests_deciding_condition as higher priority than adds_supporting_evidence", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("m2", "Does our platform meet European data regulations"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── cannot_determine — missing input ────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — cannot_determine (missing input)", () => {
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when decisionTarget is missing", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("mi1", "Whether to enter Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when decisionTarget is empty string", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: "",
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("mi2", "Whether to enter Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when decisionTarget is too short", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: "Europe",
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("mi3", "Whether to enter"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when unknown is missing", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when unknown has empty label and description", () => {
|
|
const node = makeUnknown("mi4", "");
|
|
node.label = "";
|
|
node.description = "";
|
|
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: node,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when no input object is provided", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions(null);
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when unknown node has no kind property", () => {
|
|
const node = makeUnknown("mi5", "test");
|
|
delete node.kind;
|
|
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: node,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── cannot_determine — missing / empty conditions ──────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — cannot_determine (missing conditions)", () => {
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when decisionConditions is missing", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("mc1", "Whether to enter Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when decisionConditions is an empty array", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: [],
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("mc2", "Whether to enter Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns cannot_determine when all conditions are empty strings", () => {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: ["", " ", ""],
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown("mc3", "Whether to enter Europe"),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.relevance).toBe("cannot_determine");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── Deterministic output ─────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — deterministic output", () => {
|
|
it("returns identical results for identical inputs", () => {
|
|
const node = makeUnknown("det1", "Whether there is genuine demand in Europe");
|
|
const input = { decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET, decisionConditions: CONDITIONS, unknown: node };
|
|
const r1 = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions(input);
|
|
const r2 = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions(input);
|
|
expect(r1).toEqual(r2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns the same classification across multiple calls", () => {
|
|
const results = [];
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: makeUnknown(`det2-${i}`, "Does our platform comply with GDPR"),
|
|
});
|
|
results.push(result.relevance);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(new Set(results).size).toBe(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── Input immutability ──────────────────────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — input immutability", () => {
|
|
it("does not mutate the unknown node", () => {
|
|
const node = makeUnknown("imm1", "Whether to proceed with European market entry");
|
|
const snapshot = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(node));
|
|
assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET, decisionConditions: CONDITIONS, unknown: node });
|
|
expect(node).toEqual(snapshot);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not mutate the graph (when provided)", () => {
|
|
const node = makeUnknown("imm2", "test");
|
|
const graph = makeGraphFor([node]);
|
|
const originalNodesJSON = JSON.stringify(graph.nodes);
|
|
assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET, decisionConditions: CONDITIONS, unknown: node, graph });
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(graph.nodes)).toBe(originalNodesJSON);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not mutate the decisionTarget string", () => {
|
|
const dt = "Should we enter the European market with our SaaS analytics platform?";
|
|
assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget: dt, decisionConditions: CONDITIONS, unknown: makeUnknown("imm3", "test") });
|
|
expect(dt).toBe("Should we enter the European market with our SaaS analytics platform?");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not mutate the decisionConditions array", () => {
|
|
const conditions = [...CONDITIONS];
|
|
assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET, decisionConditions: conditions, unknown: makeUnknown("imm4", "test") });
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(conditions)).toBe(JSON.stringify(CONDITIONS));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── Complete long-investigation sequence ──────────────────── */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — long investigation sequence", () => {
|
|
const scenarioName = "long";
|
|
const turnCount = 5;
|
|
|
|
const allResults = [];
|
|
|
|
for (let t = 0; t < turnCount; t++) {
|
|
const fixture = buildScenarioFixture(scenarioName, t);
|
|
expect(fixture).not.toBeNull(`Turn ${t} should have a valid fixture`);
|
|
|
|
const decisionTarget = fixture.situationGraph.centralStatement;
|
|
const resolvedIds = new Set(fixture.situationGraph.resolvedNodeIds || []);
|
|
|
|
for (const node of fixture.situationGraph.nodes) {
|
|
if (node.kind !== "unknown") continue;
|
|
if (resolvedIds.has(node.id)) continue;
|
|
|
|
const result = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({
|
|
decisionTarget,
|
|
decisionConditions: CONDITIONS,
|
|
unknown: node,
|
|
graph: fixture.situationGraph,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
allResults.push({ turn: t, nodeId: node.id, label: node.label, relevance: result.relevance, matchedCondition: result.matchedCondition, reason: result.reason });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("every unresolved unknown across all turns receives a valid classification", () => {
|
|
const validCategories = ["tests_deciding_condition", "adds_supporting_evidence", "outside_decision_conditions", "cannot_determine"];
|
|
for (const r of allResults) {
|
|
expect(validCategories).toContain(r.relevance);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("every unresolved unknown in the long sequence classifies as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
for (const r of allResults) {
|
|
expect(r.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("each unresolved unknown matches its corresponding decision condition", () => {
|
|
const expectedMatches = [
|
|
{ turn: 0, nodeId: "u-1", contains: "demand" },
|
|
{ turn: 1, nodeId: "u-2", contains: "compliance" },
|
|
{ turn: 2, nodeId: "u-3", contains: "value" },
|
|
{ turn: 3, nodeId: "u-4", contains: "differentiation" },
|
|
];
|
|
for (const expected of expectedMatches) {
|
|
const r = allResults.find((x) => x.turn === expected.turn && x.nodeId === expected.nodeId);
|
|
expect(r).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(r.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
expect(r.matchedCondition).toContain(expected.contains);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("the sequence runs deterministically and does not mutate inputs", () => {
|
|
const node = makeUnknown("det-seq", "Whether there is genuine demand in Europe");
|
|
const r1 = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET, decisionConditions: CONDITIONS, unknown: node });
|
|
const r2 = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget: DECISION_TARGET, decisionConditions: CONDITIONS, unknown: node });
|
|
expect(r1).toEqual(r2);
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(node)).toBe(JSON.stringify(makeUnknown("det-seq", "Whether there is genuine demand in Europe")));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("category distribution across the full sequence", () => {
|
|
const categories = {};
|
|
for (const r of allResults) {
|
|
categories[r.relevance] = (categories[r.relevance] || 0) + 1;
|
|
}
|
|
console.log("\n=== Experiment 22 — Classification Results ===");
|
|
console.log(`Total unresolved unknowns classified: ${allResults.length}`);
|
|
console.log("Category distribution:", JSON.stringify(categories, null, 2));
|
|
expect(allResults.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("detailed per-turn classifications", () => {
|
|
const byTurn = {};
|
|
for (const r of allResults) {
|
|
if (!byTurn[r.turn]) byTurn[r.turn] = [];
|
|
byTurn[r.turn].push(r);
|
|
}
|
|
for (const [turn, results] of Object.entries(byTurn)) {
|
|
console.log(`\n--- Turn ${turn} (${results.length} unresolved unknowns) ---`);
|
|
for (const r of results) {
|
|
const shortLabel = r.label?.length > 60 ? r.label.slice(0, 60) + "..." : r.label;
|
|
console.log(` [${r.relevance}] ${shortLabel}`);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
expect(allResults.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("Turn 0 (market demand) is classified as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const turn0 = allResults.find((r) => r.turn === 0);
|
|
expect(turn0).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(turn0.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("Turns 1-2 (compliance, cost) are classified as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const turns1to2 = allResults.filter((r) => r.turn >= 1 && r.turn <= 2);
|
|
for (const r of turns1to2) {
|
|
expect(r.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("Turn 3 (differentiation) is classified as tests_deciding_condition", () => {
|
|
const turn3 = allResults.find((r) => r.turn === 3);
|
|
expect(turn3).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(turn3.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("competitive differentiation becomes a clearly decisive classification", () => {
|
|
const differentiating = allResults.find((r) => r.nodeId === "u-4" && r.turn === 3);
|
|
expect(differentiating).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(differentiating.relevance).toBe("tests_deciding_condition");
|
|
expect(differentiating.matchedCondition).toContain("differentiation");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("all classified questions include a non-empty reason", () => {
|
|
for (const r of allResults) {
|
|
if (r.relevance !== "cannot_determine") {
|
|
expect(typeof r.reason).toBe("string");
|
|
expect(r.reason.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("every unresolved unknown has a matchedCondition when classified", () => {
|
|
for (const r of allResults) {
|
|
if (r.relevance !== "cannot_determine" && r.relevance !== "outside_decision_conditions") {
|
|
expect(r.matchedCondition).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(typeof r.matchedCondition).toBe("string");
|
|
expect(r.matchedCondition.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("the complete long-investigation sequence runs without error and produces results", () => {
|
|
expect(allResults.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/* ── Comparison with Experiment 21 — clearer distinction ─ */
|
|
|
|
describe("assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions — comparison with Experiment 21", () => {
|
|
it("distinguishes between decisive and supporting questions (Experiment 22 vs 21)", () => {
|
|
const conditions = CONDITIONS;
|
|
|
|
const decisions21 = [];
|
|
const decisions22 = [];
|
|
|
|
for (let t = 0; t < 4; t++) {
|
|
const fixture = buildScenarioFixture("long", t);
|
|
if (!fixture) continue;
|
|
const decisionTarget = fixture.situationGraph.centralStatement;
|
|
|
|
for (const node of fixture.situationGraph.nodes) {
|
|
if (node.kind !== "unknown") continue;
|
|
const resolvedIds = new Set(fixture.situationGraph.resolvedNodeIds || []);
|
|
if (resolvedIds.has(node.id)) continue;
|
|
|
|
// Experiment 21 classification
|
|
const r21 = assessQuestionRelevanceToDecision({ decisionTarget, unknown: node });
|
|
decisions21.push({ turn: t, label: node.label, relevance: r21.relevance });
|
|
|
|
// Experiment 22 classification
|
|
const r22 = assessQuestionAgainstDecisionConditions({ decisionTarget, decisionConditions: conditions, unknown: node });
|
|
decisions22.push({ turn: t, label: node.label, relevance: r22.relevance });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const distinct21 = new Set(decisions21.map((r) => r.relevance));
|
|
const distinct22 = new Set(decisions22.map((r) => r.relevance));
|
|
|
|
// Experiment 22 should have a clearer distinction than 21
|
|
expect(distinct21.size).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
|
|
expect(distinct22.size).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
|
|
|
|
// Verify at least some questions moved to tests_deciding_condition in Exp 22
|
|
const decisiveCount = decisions22.filter((r) => r.relevance === "tests_deciding_condition").length;
|
|
expect(decisiveCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|