@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
||||
# Representation Type Policy Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This directory contains a narrow **representation type policy boundary**.
|
||||
|
||||
It currently owns only the behaviour-preserving rule engine that converts an
|
||||
already prepared policy context into the current ordered array of available
|
||||
representation type strings.
|
||||
|
||||
It is **not** a full representation domain model.
|
||||
|
||||
This boundary should be treated as a small, compatibility-preserving extraction
|
||||
seam for type-availability decisions, not as a place to redesign the
|
||||
representation journey.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Current ownership
|
||||
|
||||
### `getAvailableRepresentationTypes(context)`
|
||||
|
||||
Purpose:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
prepared context
|
||||
↓
|
||||
ordered representation-type string array
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The helper currently returns the live consumer contract as an ordered array of
|
||||
strings, including values such as:
|
||||
|
||||
- `Questionnaire`
|
||||
- `Statement`
|
||||
- `Final comments`
|
||||
- `Consultation Response`
|
||||
- `Local Impact Report`
|
||||
- `Marine Impact Report`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit contract
|
||||
|
||||
Current behaviour intentionally preserves:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact string values
|
||||
- exact ordering
|
||||
- deduplication behaviour
|
||||
- current DNS behaviour
|
||||
- current SIPS behaviour
|
||||
- current Householder behaviour
|
||||
- current Advert behaviour
|
||||
- current CPO behaviour
|
||||
- current specialist-process behaviour
|
||||
- current LPA / non-LPA behaviour
|
||||
- current NRW behaviour
|
||||
|
||||
This is a **consumer-facing compatibility contract**.
|
||||
|
||||
Changing any of the following would currently be a contract change, not just an
|
||||
internal refactor:
|
||||
|
||||
- returned string values
|
||||
- returned ordering
|
||||
- returned deduplication semantics
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Compatibility requirements
|
||||
|
||||
The following date fields are compatibility-sensitive and must be preserved
|
||||
carefully:
|
||||
|
||||
- `pinswg_startdate`
|
||||
- `pinswg_startdates`
|
||||
- `pinswg_statementduedate`
|
||||
- `pinswg_statementsduedate`
|
||||
- `pinswg_applicationacceptedasvalid`
|
||||
|
||||
These fallbacks are characterized behaviour and must not be casually removed.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
This boundary does **not** currently own:
|
||||
|
||||
- capacity ownership
|
||||
- capacity selection UX
|
||||
- `buildRepresentationContext(...)`
|
||||
- translation mapping
|
||||
- Welsh labels
|
||||
- file naming
|
||||
- upload logic
|
||||
- submission logic
|
||||
- finalisation logic
|
||||
- questionnaire routing
|
||||
- Redux state
|
||||
- API routes
|
||||
- CRM queries
|
||||
- dashboard behaviour
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Adapter boundary
|
||||
|
||||
`buildRepresentationContext(...)` intentionally remains outside this domain
|
||||
boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
It should currently be treated as an **adapter layer**:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
CRM / UI state
|
||||
↓
|
||||
policy context
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
It is not currently a domain helper.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Future evolution
|
||||
|
||||
Any future migration from English string values to:
|
||||
|
||||
- stable IDs
|
||||
- enums
|
||||
- keys
|
||||
|
||||
would be a **contract change**, not merely refactoring.
|
||||
|
||||
That kind of migration must be explicitly scoped and characterized before any
|
||||
implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing expectations
|
||||
|
||||
Current minimum safety net for this boundary:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
node tests/phase22/representation-build-reps-arr-rules.test.cjs
|
||||
npm run lint
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
|
||||
const APPEAL_TYPES = {
|
||||
SIPS: 846040002,
|
||||
DNS: 846040011,
|
||||
HOUSEHOLDER: 846040004,
|
||||
ADVERT: 846040018,
|
||||
EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_1: 846040019,
|
||||
EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_2: 846040015,
|
||||
EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_3: 846040016
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const SPECIALIST_PROCESS = {
|
||||
WRITTEN_REPS: 846040000,
|
||||
HEARING: 846040001
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS = {
|
||||
QUESTIONNAIRE: "Questionnaire",
|
||||
STATEMENT: "Statement",
|
||||
FINAL_COMMENTS: "Final comments",
|
||||
CONSULTATION_RESPONSE: "Consultation Response",
|
||||
LOCAL_IMPACT_REPORT: "Local Impact Report",
|
||||
MARINE_IMPACT_REPORT: "Marine Impact Report"
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const isValidDate = (date) =>
|
||||
date instanceof Date && !Number.isNaN(date.getTime());
|
||||
|
||||
const isWithinWindow = (now, start, end) => {
|
||||
if (!isValidDate(now) || !isValidDate(start) || !isValidDate(end)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return now >= start && now <= end;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const addQuestionnaire = (options, ctx) => {
|
||||
const excludedTypes = [
|
||||
APPEAL_TYPES.EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_1,
|
||||
APPEAL_TYPES.DNS,
|
||||
APPEAL_TYPES.EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_2,
|
||||
APPEAL_TYPES.EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_3
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
const canAdd =
|
||||
ctx.isLPA &&
|
||||
!excludedTypes.includes(ctx.appealType) &&
|
||||
isWithinWindow(ctx.now, ctx.startDate, ctx.finalCommentsDueDate);
|
||||
|
||||
if (canAdd) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.QUESTIONNAIRE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const addStatements = (options, ctx) => {
|
||||
const isLpaAdvertPart3NoStatement =
|
||||
ctx.isLPA &&
|
||||
ctx.appealType === APPEAL_TYPES.ADVERT &&
|
||||
ctx.specialistProcess === SPECIALIST_PROCESS.WRITTEN_REPS;
|
||||
|
||||
const canAddDnsLpaDocs =
|
||||
ctx.isLPA &&
|
||||
ctx.isDNS &&
|
||||
ctx.appealType !== APPEAL_TYPES.EXCLUDE_QUESTIONNAIRE_1 &&
|
||||
!ctx.isCaseOwner &&
|
||||
isWithinWindow(ctx.now, ctx.startDate, ctx.finalCommentsDueDate);
|
||||
|
||||
if (canAddDnsLpaDocs) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.LOCAL_IMPACT_REPORT);
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.STATEMENT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const canAddStatementForNonDns =
|
||||
!ctx.isDNS &&
|
||||
ctx.appealType !== APPEAL_TYPES.HOUSEHOLDER &&
|
||||
!isLpaAdvertPart3NoStatement &&
|
||||
!ctx.isCaseOwner &&
|
||||
isWithinWindow(ctx.now, ctx.startDate, ctx.statementDueDate);
|
||||
|
||||
if (canAddStatementForNonDns) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.STATEMENT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const canAddStatementForDnsNonLpa =
|
||||
ctx.isDNS &&
|
||||
!ctx.isLPA &&
|
||||
!ctx.isCaseOwner &&
|
||||
isWithinWindow(ctx.now, ctx.startDate, ctx.statementDueDate);
|
||||
|
||||
if (canAddStatementForDnsNonLpa) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.STATEMENT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const addFinalComments = (options, ctx) => {
|
||||
const canSubmitFinalCommentsDefault =
|
||||
ctx.isSelectedAppellant ||
|
||||
ctx.isSelectedAgent ||
|
||||
ctx.isSelectedInterestedParty ||
|
||||
ctx.isLPA;
|
||||
|
||||
const canSubmitFinalComments = ctx.isDNS
|
||||
? ctx.isLPA
|
||||
: canSubmitFinalCommentsDefault;
|
||||
|
||||
const isSpecialistNonHearing =
|
||||
ctx.specialistProcess !== SPECIALIST_PROCESS.HEARING;
|
||||
|
||||
const finalCommentsWindowStart = ctx.isDNS
|
||||
? ctx.startDate
|
||||
: ctx.statementDueDate;
|
||||
|
||||
const canAdd =
|
||||
canSubmitFinalComments &&
|
||||
isWithinWindow(
|
||||
ctx.now,
|
||||
finalCommentsWindowStart,
|
||||
ctx.finalCommentsDueDate
|
||||
) &&
|
||||
(ctx.appealType !== APPEAL_TYPES.HOUSEHOLDER || isSpecialistNonHearing);
|
||||
|
||||
if (canAdd) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.FINAL_COMMENTS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const addConsultation = (options, ctx) => {
|
||||
if (!ctx.isSIPS) return;
|
||||
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.CONSULTATION_RESPONSE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ctx.isSelectedAppellant) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.LOCAL_IMPACT_REPORT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ctx.isNRW) {
|
||||
options.add(REPRESENTATION_OPTIONS.MARINE_IMPACT_REPORT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
export const getAvailableRepresentationTypes = (ctx) => {
|
||||
const options = new Set();
|
||||
addQuestionnaire(options, ctx);
|
||||
addStatements(options, ctx);
|
||||
addFinalComments(options, ctx);
|
||||
addConsultation(options, ctx);
|
||||
return [...options];
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
export { getAvailableRepresentationTypes } from "./getAvailableRepresentationTypes";
|
||||
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ const loadBuildRepsArrRulesModule = () => {
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let source = fs.readFileSync(filePath, "utf8");
|
||||
source = source.replace(
|
||||
/const\s+\{\s*getAvailableRepresentationTypes\s*\}\s*=\s*require\("\.\.\.\.\/\.\.\.\/\.\.\.\/lib\/domain\/representation-type-policy\/getAvailableRepresentationTypes"\);/,
|
||||
'const { getAvailableRepresentationTypes } = require("../../../../lib/domain/representation-type-policy/getAvailableRepresentationTypes");'
|
||||
);
|
||||
source = source.replace(/export const\s+/g, "const ");
|
||||
source += `
|
||||
module.exports = {
|
||||
@@ -28,12 +32,47 @@ module.exports = {
|
||||
`;
|
||||
|
||||
const context = {
|
||||
module: { exports: {} },
|
||||
exports: {},
|
||||
require: (modulePath) => {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
modulePath ===
|
||||
"../../../../lib/domain/representation-type-policy/getAvailableRepresentationTypes"
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const domainFilePath = path.join(
|
||||
rootDir,
|
||||
"lib",
|
||||
"domain",
|
||||
"representation-type-policy",
|
||||
"getAvailableRepresentationTypes.js"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let domainSource = fs.readFileSync(domainFilePath, "utf8");
|
||||
domainSource = domainSource.replace(
|
||||
/export const\s+getAvailableRepresentationTypes\s*=/g,
|
||||
"const getAvailableRepresentationTypes ="
|
||||
);
|
||||
domainSource +=
|
||||
"\nmodule.exports = { getAvailableRepresentationTypes };\n";
|
||||
|
||||
const domainContext = {
|
||||
module: { exports: {} },
|
||||
exports: {},
|
||||
require,
|
||||
Date
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
vm.runInNewContext(domainSource, domainContext, {
|
||||
filename: domainFilePath
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return domainContext.module.exports;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return require(modulePath);
|
||||
},
|
||||
Date
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
vm.runInNewContext(source, context, { filename: filePath });
|
||||
return context.module.exports;
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -418,6 +457,94 @@ test("invalid or missing dates suppress date-gated options but SIPS consultation
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("non-DNS startdate plural fallback preserves successful statement availability and current output order", () => {
|
||||
assert.deepStrictEqual(
|
||||
buildOptions({
|
||||
detailsObj: {
|
||||
pinswg_startdate: null,
|
||||
pinswg_startdates: "2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_statementduedate: "2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_finalcommentsduedate: "2026-05-25T00:00:00.000Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
selectedCapacity: "appellant",
|
||||
isCaseOwner: false,
|
||||
now: new Date("2026-04-15T10:00:00.000Z")
|
||||
}),
|
||||
["Statement"]
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.deepStrictEqual(
|
||||
buildOptions({
|
||||
detailsObj: {
|
||||
pinswg_startdate: null,
|
||||
pinswg_startdates: "2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_statementduedate: "2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_finalcommentsduedate: "2026-05-25T00:00:00.000Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
selectedCapacity: "agent",
|
||||
involvementType: INVOLVEMENT_TYPES.LPA,
|
||||
isCaseOwner: false,
|
||||
isNRW: true,
|
||||
appealType: APPEAL_TYPES.SIPS,
|
||||
now: new Date("2026-05-10T10:00:00.000Z")
|
||||
}),
|
||||
[
|
||||
"Questionnaire",
|
||||
"Final comments",
|
||||
"Consultation Response",
|
||||
"Local Impact Report",
|
||||
"Marine Impact Report"
|
||||
]
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("non-DNS statementsduedate plural fallback preserves successful final comments availability", () => {
|
||||
assert.deepStrictEqual(
|
||||
buildOptions({
|
||||
detailsObj: {
|
||||
pinswg_startdate: "2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_statementduedate: null,
|
||||
pinswg_statementsduedate: "2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_finalcommentsduedate: "2026-05-25T00:00:00.000Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
selectedCapacity: "interestedparty",
|
||||
isCaseOwner: false,
|
||||
now: new Date("2026-05-10T10:00:00.000Z")
|
||||
}),
|
||||
["Final comments"]
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("combined plural date fallbacks preserve successful statement and final comments availability across windows", () => {
|
||||
const detailsObj = {
|
||||
pinswg_startdate: null,
|
||||
pinswg_startdates: "2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_statementduedate: null,
|
||||
pinswg_statementsduedate: "2026-04-30T00:00:00.000Z",
|
||||
pinswg_finalcommentsduedate: "2026-05-25T00:00:00.000Z"
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
assert.deepStrictEqual(
|
||||
buildOptions({
|
||||
detailsObj,
|
||||
selectedCapacity: "appellant",
|
||||
isCaseOwner: false,
|
||||
now: new Date("2026-04-15T10:00:00.000Z")
|
||||
}),
|
||||
["Statement"]
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.deepStrictEqual(
|
||||
buildOptions({
|
||||
detailsObj,
|
||||
selectedCapacity: "appellant",
|
||||
isCaseOwner: false,
|
||||
now: new Date("2026-05-10T10:00:00.000Z")
|
||||
}),
|
||||
["Final comments"]
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("capacity normalization coverage", () => {
|
||||
const inFinalWindow = { now: new Date("2026-05-10T10:00:00.000Z") };
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user