docs: add current-state context pack and actionable sequence-b prompts

This commit is contained in:
2026-03-25 13:08:05 +00:00
parent e238ec079f
commit 30fad8e954
10 changed files with 568 additions and 10 deletions
+37 -4
View File
@@ -29,13 +29,20 @@ impact: Potential privacy/security exposure via operational logs.
status: open
Question:
What mandatory redaction and logging policy should be enforced for auth/email/document flows?
What mandatory redaction and structured logging policy should be enforced for auth/email/document flows (fields blocked, allowed metadata, and incident correlation expectations)?
Needed from:
Security lead + application owner
Decision deadline:
Before next auth/notification release
Before Sequence B Workstream B2 rollout
Current context:
- Relay logging policy has already been hardened in middleware, but auth/email/file routes still have uneven logging style.
- Reference planning docs:
- `context/next-work-plan-sequence-b.md`
- `context/current-state-scorecard.md`
### Q-002: Test Strategy Baseline for Sparse `tests/`
@@ -48,10 +55,36 @@ impact: Increased regression risk and slower release confidence.
status: open
Question:
What minimum automated coverage should be required per change type (feature, bug fix, high-risk integration)?
What minimum automated coverage should be required per change type (feature, bug fix, high-risk integration), and which suites become mandatory CI gates?
Needed from:
Engineering lead + QA
Decision deadline:
Before next major feature cycle
Before enabling Sequence C CI parity gate rollout
Current context:
- Focused high-risk automation exists in phase21/phase22 (auth redirect, i18n route parity, relay hardening, endpoint contract slices).
- A formal CI baseline decision is still needed to institutionalize these checks.
---
### Q-003: Runtime canonical startup path selection
date: 2026-03-25
author: Cline
scope: runtime startup path and operational documentation
type: question
rationale: Dual server entrypoints (`server.js` and `server/server.js`) remain a known architecture ambiguity in review artifacts.
impact: Operational ambiguity can increase deployment and incident-response risk.
status: open
Question:
Which startup path is canonical for dev/test/prod, and what is the deprecation plan for the non-canonical entrypoint?
Needed from:
Technical lead + DevOps owner
Decision deadline:
Before runtime-affecting refactor or next deployment process update