diff --git a/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnaires/representationLPAQuestionnaire_s78.js b/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnaires/representationLPAQuestionnaire_s78.js index 0c62a866..c60b81f8 100644 --- a/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnaires/representationLPAQuestionnaire_s78.js +++ b/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnaires/representationLPAQuestionnaire_s78.js @@ -657,7 +657,10 @@ let S78_Questionnaire = (props) => { { )} component={RenderLPACondtionalRadioList} validate={[required]} - legend={t( - "myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24b" - )} + legend={ + "b) " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24b") + } conditionalLabel={t( "myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24b-hint" )} @@ -700,7 +704,10 @@ let S78_Questionnaire = (props) => { /> { errorMsg={t("myrepresentations:select-an-option-label")} /> { {/* Section 1 Appeal procedure and site visit */} <>

- Appeal procedure and site visit + {t("myrepresentations:enf-section-heading-one")}

{_.has(repFormData, "procedureType") && ( <>
- 4. Which procedure do you consider the appeal - should follow? + {"4. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-4" + )}
@@ -94,8 +96,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 5. Will the Inspector need to enter the appeal - site/property?{" "} + {"5. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-5" + )}
@@ -127,9 +131,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 6. Do you consider that the Inspector needs to - enter neighbouring private land/property to view - the site? + {"6. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-6" + )}
@@ -159,7 +164,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -197,11 +204,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 7. If access to private land/buildings is - required, are you content for the Inspector to - visit the site on an ‘access required’ basis, - with only the landowner or their representative - present? + {"7. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-7" + )}
@@ -233,7 +239,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -271,9 +279,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 8. Are you aware of any health and safety issues - which would need to be considered when the - Inspector visits the site? + {"8. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-8" + )}
@@ -302,7 +311,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.healthAndSafetyIssues == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -340,8 +351,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 9. LPA contact for site visit, hearing or - inquiry arrangements: + {"9. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-9" + )}
@@ -384,10 +397,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 10. Has the Local Planning Authority received - the correct fee payable in relation to this - appeal for the deemed planning - application/ground (a) to be considered? + {"10. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-10" + )}
@@ -419,7 +432,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 11. Is the appeal fee exempt? + {"11. " + + t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-11" + )}
@@ -489,7 +505,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.previousGrantedCerts == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -559,7 +577,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.stopNoticeServed == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -629,7 +649,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.relatedCases == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -699,7 +721,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.previousEnforcement == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -769,7 +793,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.subjectArticle4 == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -839,7 +865,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.previousPDRRestriction == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1071,7 +1099,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.ROW == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1141,7 +1171,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.conservationArea == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1211,7 +1243,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.affectListedBuilding == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1281,7 +1315,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.TPO == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1351,7 +1387,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.natureConservationSite == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1421,7 +1459,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.protectedSpecies == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1526,7 +1566,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.floodingIssue == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1596,7 +1638,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.governmentDepartmentComments == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1714,7 +1758,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1823,7 +1869,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1888,7 +1936,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.developmentAnyOtherConditions == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1962,7 +2012,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.copyOfEnforcementNotice == "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2030,7 +2082,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.enforcementNoticePlan != "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2098,7 +2152,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.listOfNotifiedOfEnforcement != "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2166,7 +2222,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.copyOfLetterOfAppealNotification == "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2234,7 +2292,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.lpaEIAOS == "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2302,7 +2362,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.detailsOfOtherAppeals == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2370,7 +2432,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.detailsOfPreviousAppeals == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2408,8 +2472,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- 40. Any other relevant information that we should - know about? + {"40. " + + t("myrepresentations:enf-section-question-40")}
@@ -2438,7 +2502,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {repFormData.otherRelevantInformation == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -2475,12 +2541,16 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {/* Section 9 Declaration */} <>

- Declaration + {t("myrepresentations:enf-section-heading-eight")}

{_.has(repFormData, "signedDate") && ( <>
-
Signed
+
+ {t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-signed" + )} +
{repFormData.caseOfficer} @@ -2510,7 +2580,11 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { {_.has(repFormData, "caseOfficer") && ( <>
-
Date
+
+ {t( + "myrepresentations:s78-section-heading-date" + )} +
{formatDates(repFormData.signedDate)} @@ -2541,7 +2615,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_enforcement = (props) => { <>
- On behalf of + {t( + "myrepresentations:enf-section-question-onbehalf" + )}
diff --git a/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnairesCheck/representationLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78.js b/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnairesCheck/representationLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78.js index 20baf1ad..eae18fe3 100644 --- a/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnairesCheck/representationLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78.js +++ b/components/case/representation/representationQuestionnairesCheck/representationLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78.js @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 5. Which procedure do you consider the appeal should - follow? + {"5. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-5")}
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 6. Will the Inspector need to enter the appeal - site/property?{" "} + {"6. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-6")}
@@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 7. Do you consider that the Inspector needs to enter - neighbouring private land/property to view the site? + {"7. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-7")}
@@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.enterNeighbouringLandToViewSite == "Yes" && (
- {t("case:representation-onbehalfof-details")} + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -186,10 +188,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 8. If access to private land/buildings is required, - are you content for the Inspector to visit the site - on an ‘access required’ basis, with only the - landowner or their representative present? + {"8. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-8")}
@@ -219,7 +219,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -257,9 +259,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 9. Are you aware of any health and safety issues - which would need to be considered when the Inspector - visits the site? + {"9. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-9")}
@@ -288,7 +289,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.healthAndSafetyIssues == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -326,8 +329,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 10. LPA contact for site visit, hearing or inquiry - arrangements: + {"10. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-10")}
@@ -367,7 +370,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 11. LPA case file and represen- tations + {"11. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-11")}
@@ -407,8 +411,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 12. LPA’s adopted Local Development Plan and Proposals - Map + {"12. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-12")}
@@ -448,7 +452,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 13. {t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-13")} + {"13. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-13")}
@@ -489,8 +494,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 14. If applicable, do you intend to submit a full - statement at the 4-week stage? + {"14. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-14")}
@@ -583,7 +588,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.ROW == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -621,8 +628,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 17. Is all or part of the site within a Conservation - Area? + {"17. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-17")}
@@ -651,7 +658,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.conservationArea == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -689,9 +698,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 18. Would the proposal involve works to, or affect - the setting of, a listed building, Scheduled - Monument or other designated historic asset? + {"18. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-18")}
@@ -720,7 +728,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.affectListedBuilding == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -758,8 +768,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 19. Is any part of the site subject to a Tree - Preservation Order? + {"19. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-19")}
@@ -788,7 +798,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.TPO == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -826,9 +838,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 20. Is the site within or likely to affect an - International or National Designated Site for nature - conservation (as defined in Planning Policy Wales)? + {"20. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-20")}
@@ -857,7 +868,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.natureConservationSite == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -895,8 +908,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 21. Are any protected species likely to be affected - by the proposal? + {"21. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-21")}
@@ -925,7 +938,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.protectedSpecies == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -963,9 +978,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 22. Does the case involve persons claiming - Gypsy/Traveller status, whether or not this is - accepted by the LPA? + {"22. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-22")}
@@ -997,10 +1011,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 23. Have you received comments or directions from - any government department/agency or statutory - undertaker, including in response to a statutory - notification or consultation? + {"23. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-23")}
@@ -1029,7 +1041,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.governmentDepartmentComments == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1067,8 +1081,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 24a. The development shall begin not later than five - years from the date of this decision. + {"24a. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24a")}
@@ -1100,12 +1114,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 24b. The development shall be carried out in - accordance with the following approved plans and - documents: ............................ Reason: To - ensure the development is carried out in accordance - with the approved documents, plans and drawings - submitted with the application. + {"24b. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24b")}
@@ -1134,7 +1144,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.developmentCarriedOutInAccordance == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1172,11 +1184,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 24c. No development shall take place until a scheme - for biodiversity enhancement has been submitted to - and agreed in writing by the local planning - authority. Development shall be carried out in - accordance with the approved details. + {"24c. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24c")}
@@ -1208,16 +1217,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 24d. No development shall take place until a scheme - to enable the provision of gigabit capable broadband - infrastructure from the site boundary to the - dwellings/buildings hereby permitted has been - submitted to and agreed in writing by the local - planning authority. Development shall be carried out - in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To - support the roll-out of digital communications - infrastructure across Wales in accordance with - Policy 13 of Future Wales. + {"24d. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-24d")}
@@ -1246,7 +1247,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.developmentNotTakePlaceBroadband == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1284,9 +1287,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 25. Do you consider other conditions, or amended - versions of the above standard conditions, to be - necessary? + {"25. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-25")}
@@ -1315,7 +1317,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.developmentAnyOtherConditions == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1353,9 +1357,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 26. A copy of the applicant’s certificate confirming - that they notified persons with an interest in the - land? + {"26. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-26")}
@@ -1384,7 +1387,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.copyOfApplicantsCertificate == "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1422,9 +1427,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 27. Evidence of any publicity given to the - application, including site notices and local - advertisement? + {"27. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-27")}
@@ -1453,7 +1457,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.advertismentGiven == "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1491,9 +1497,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 28. A copy of the letter with which you notified - people of the appeal AND a list of the people you - notified? + {"28. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-28")}
@@ -1522,7 +1527,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.copyOfLetterOfAppealNotification == "No" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1560,8 +1567,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 29. The LPA’s Environmental Impact Assessment - Screening Opinion, if applicable? + {"29. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-29")}
@@ -1590,7 +1597,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.lpaEIAOS == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1628,9 +1637,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 30. Advertisement consent proposals only: A true - copy of the Discontinuance Notice (if one has been - issued)? + {"30. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-30")}
@@ -1661,7 +1669,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.lpaEIAOS == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1699,10 +1709,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 31. Details of other appeals or applications - relating to the site, or a nearby site, which are - still being considered by PEDW or the Welsh - Ministers? + {"31. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-31")}
@@ -1731,7 +1739,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.detailsOfOtherAppeals == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1769,9 +1779,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 32. Details of any previous appeal decision relating - to the site or a nearby site referred to by the LPA - or applicant? + {"32. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-32")}
@@ -1800,7 +1809,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.detailsOfPreviousAppeals == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1838,8 +1849,8 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- 33. Any other relevant information that we should - know about? + {"33. " + + t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-33")}
@@ -1868,7 +1879,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {repFormData.otherRelevantInformation == "Yes" && (
- Evidence + {t( + "myrepresentations:questionnaire-evidence-label" + )}
@@ -1905,7 +1918,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {_.has(repFormData, "signedDate") && ( <>
-
Signed
+
+ {t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-signed")} +
{repFormData.caseOfficer} @@ -1935,7 +1950,10 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { {_.has(repFormData, "caseOfficer") && ( <>
-
Date
+
+ {" "} + {t("myrepresentations:s78-section-question-date")} +
{formatDates(repFormData.signedDate)} @@ -1966,7 +1984,9 @@ let RepLPAQuestionnaireCheck_s78 = (props) => { <>
- On behalf of + {t( + "myrepresentations:s78-section-question-onbehalf" + )}
diff --git a/components/pdftemplates/enforcement_pdf.js b/components/pdftemplates/enforcement_pdf.js index 09111076..20ce4a38 100644 --- a/components/pdftemplates/enforcement_pdf.js +++ b/components/pdftemplates/enforcement_pdf.js @@ -167,7 +167,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { fontFamily: "Helvetica-Bold", }} > - Local Planning Authority Questionnaire + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "lpa-questionnaire-heading" + )} { fontFamily: "Helvetica-Bold", }} > - For Planning Enforcement Appeals + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "lpa-questionnaire-subheading-enf" + )} @@ -191,10 +197,7 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { - The LPA must send the completed questionnaire and - any attachments to PEDW.casework@gov.wales and the - appellant (or their agent) within 5 working days of - the start date specified in our start letter. + {getTrans(docProps.locale, "s78-heading-para-two")} @@ -204,7 +207,12 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { fontFamily: "Helvetica-Bold", }} > - Case details + + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "section-heading-zero" + )} + { : - {values.lpaReference} + {values.pinswg_lpareference} { > 3. - Site address/grid ref: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-3" + )} {values.siteAddress} @@ -294,8 +305,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 4. - Which procedure do you consider the - appeal should follow? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-4" + )} {values.procedureType} @@ -321,8 +334,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 5. - Will the Inspector need to enter the appeal - site/property? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-5" + )} {values.enterToView} @@ -345,9 +360,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 6. - Do you consider that the Inspector needs - to enter neighbouring private - land/property to view the site? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-6" + )} {values.enterNeighbouringLandToViewSite} @@ -381,12 +397,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 7. - If access to private land/buildings is - required, are you content for the - Inspector to visit the site on an - ‘access required’ basis, with only the - landowner or their representative - present? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-7" + )} { @@ -421,9 +435,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 8. - Are you aware of any health and safety - issues which would need to be considered - when the Inspector visits the site? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-8" + )} {values.healthAndSafetyIssues} @@ -456,8 +471,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { - LPA contact for site visit, hearing or - inquiry arrangements: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-9" + )} @@ -477,7 +494,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Deemed Application Fee{" "} + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-heading-two" + )} @@ -498,11 +518,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 10. - Has the Local Planning Authority - received the correct fee payable in - relation to this appeal for the deemed - planning application/ground (a) to be - considered? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-10" + )} {values.feePaid} @@ -526,7 +545,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 11. - Is the appeal fee exempt? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-11" + )} {values.feeExempt} @@ -553,7 +575,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Supporting documents + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-heading-three" + )} @@ -566,10 +591,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 12. - Have any planning permissions or lawful - development certificates been granted - previously in respect of the development or - on the site? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-12" + )} {values.previousGrantedCerts} @@ -593,8 +618,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 13. - Has a Stop Notice been served in addition to - the Enforcement Notice? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-13" + )} {values.stopNoticeServed} @@ -618,10 +645,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 14. - Are there any related cases (e.g. appeals - under s78 of the Town and Country Planning - Act 1990) which are currently or have - previously been before the Welsh Ministers? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-14" + )} {values.relatedCases} @@ -643,8 +670,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 15. - Has there been any previous enforcement - action on the site? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-15" + )} {values.previousEnforcement} @@ -668,8 +697,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 16. - Is the site subject to an Article 4 - Direction? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-16" + )} {values.subjectArticle4} @@ -693,9 +724,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 17. - Have permitted development rights been - restricted by any previous planning - condition? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-17" + )} {values.previousPDRRestriction} @@ -721,7 +753,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Supporting documents + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-heading-four" + )} @@ -742,8 +777,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 18. - LPA’s adopted Local Development Plan and - Proposals Map + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-18" + )} @@ -769,8 +806,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 19. - Adopted local guidance relevant to the - proposal: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-19" + )} @@ -788,8 +827,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 20. - If applicable, do you intend to submit a - full statement at the 4-week stage? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-20" + )} {values.LPAintentionToSubmitFullStatement} @@ -805,7 +846,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Statutory considerations + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-heading-five" + )} @@ -818,8 +862,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 21. - Is all or part of the site within an Area of - Outstanding Natural Beauty? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-21" + )} {values.AONB} @@ -841,8 +887,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 22. - Does the site include any public rights - of way? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-22" + )} {values.ROW} @@ -872,8 +920,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 23. - Is all or part of the site within a - Conservation Area? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-23" + )} {values.conservationArea}{" "} @@ -905,10 +955,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 24. - Does the development include works to, - or affect the setting of, a listed - building, Scheduled Monument or other - designated historic asset? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-24" + )} {values.affectListedBuilding} @@ -940,8 +990,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 25. - Is any part of the site subject to a - Tree Preservation Order? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-25" + )} {values.TPO} @@ -971,10 +1023,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 26. - Is the site within or likely to affect - an International or National Designated - Site for nature conservation (as defined - in Planning Policy Wales)? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-26" + )} {values.natureConservationSite} @@ -1006,8 +1058,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 27. - Are any protected species likely to be - affected by the proposal? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-27" + )} {values.protectedSpecies} @@ -1032,9 +1086,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 28. - Does the case involve persons claiming - Gypsy/Traveller status, whether or not this - is accepted by the LPA? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-28" + )} {values.gypsyTravellerInvolvment} @@ -1056,7 +1111,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 29. - Is flooding an issue? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-29" + )} {values.floodingIssue} @@ -1088,11 +1146,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 30. - Have you received comments or directions - from any government department/agency or - statutory undertaker, including in - response to a statutory notification or - consultation? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-30" + )} {values.governmentDepartmentComments} @@ -1119,7 +1176,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Suggested considerations + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-heading-six" + )} @@ -1132,10 +1192,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > 31. - If there is an appeal on ground (a), review - the following standard conditions and advise - whether they would be necessary if - permission is granted: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-31" + )} @@ -1155,14 +1215,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { a) - The development shall be carried out in - accordance with the following approved - plans and documents: - ............................ Reason: To - ensure the development is carried out in - accordance with the approved documents, - plans and drawings submitted with the - application. + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-31a" + )} { @@ -1190,14 +1246,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { > b) - No development shall take place until a - scheme for biodiversity enhancement has been - submitted to and agreed in writing by the - Local Planning Authority. Development shall - be carried out in accordance with the - approved details. Reason: In the interests - of maintaining and enhancing biodiversity, - in accordance with Future Wales Policy 9. + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-31b" + )} {values.developmentNotTakePlaceBiodiversity} @@ -1210,20 +1262,12 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { marginBottom: 10, }} > - d) + c) - No development shall take place until a - scheme to enable the provision of gigabit - capable broadband infrastructure from the - site boundary to the dwellings/buildings - hereby permitted has been submitted to and - agreed in writing by the local planning - authority. Development shall be carried out - in accordance with the approved details. - Reason: To support the roll-out of digital - communications infrastructure across Wales - in accordance with Policy 13 of Future - Wales. + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-31c" + )} {values.developmentNotTakePlaceBroadband} @@ -1242,12 +1286,13 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - 25. + 32. - Do you consider other conditions, or - amended versions of the above standard - conditions, to be necessary? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-32" + )} {values.developmentAnyOtherConditions} @@ -1274,8 +1319,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Before sending, have you attached or provided a - web link to: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "s78-section-heading-five-sub" + )} @@ -1295,7 +1342,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 33. - A true copy of the enforcement notice? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-33" + )} {values.copyOfEnforcementNotice} @@ -1326,7 +1376,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 34. - The enforcement notice plan. + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-34" + )} {values.enforcementNoticePlan} @@ -1358,8 +1411,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 35. - A list of those served with the - enforcement notice. + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-35" + )} {values.listOfNotifiedOfEnforcement} @@ -1389,9 +1444,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 36. - A copy of the letter with which you - notified people of the appeal AND a list - of the people you notified? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-36" + )} { @@ -1424,9 +1480,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 37. - The LPA’s Environmental Impact - Assessment Screening Opinion and - ‘Regulation 45 Notice’, if applicable? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-37" + )} {values.lpaEIAOS} @@ -1456,10 +1513,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 38. - Details of other appeals or applications - relating to the site, or a nearby site, - which are still being considered by PEDW - or the Welsh Ministers? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-38" + )} {values.detailsOfOtherAppeals} @@ -1492,9 +1549,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 39. - Details of any previous appeal decision - relating to the site or a nearby site - referred to by the LPA or applicant? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-39" + )} {values.detailsOfPreviousAppeals} @@ -1527,8 +1585,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { 40. - Any other relevant information that we - should know about? + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-40" + )} {values.otherRelevantInformation} @@ -1553,7 +1613,12 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { fontFamily: "Helvetica-Bold", }} > - Declaration + + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-heading-eight" + )} + { - Signed: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-signed" + )} { marginLeft: 10, }} > - Date: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-date" + )} {formatDates(values.signedDate)} @@ -1621,7 +1692,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - On behalf of: + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "enf-section-question-onbehalf" + )} {values.onBehalfOfLPA} @@ -1636,7 +1710,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - Supporting documents + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "lpa-list-supporting-documents-heading" + )} @@ -1655,7 +1732,10 @@ export const EnforcementQuestionnaire_pdf = ({ docProps }) => { }} > - List of attached files + {getTrans( + docProps.locale, + "lpa-list-supporting-documents-list" + )}