@@ -18,6 +18,44 @@ Follow-ups:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### CL-2026-06-18-CRM-CASE-PROGRESS-CONTEXT: record CRM Case Progress Display investigation conclusions
|
||||
|
||||
date: 2026-06-18
|
||||
author: Cline
|
||||
scope: `context/current-platform-state.md`, `memory-bank/{techContext,productContext,change-log}.md`
|
||||
type: change
|
||||
rationale: Preserve the completed CRM Case Progress Display investigation conclusions in project context so future contributors do not re-open the same status/lifecycle ambiguity without need.
|
||||
impact: Documentation/context only; improves architectural clarity around case status display ownership and inputs; no runtime, auth, i18n, API, or behaviour change.
|
||||
status: completed
|
||||
|
||||
Summary:
|
||||
|
||||
- Updated project context to record that the Case Status tab is a portal-owned journey interpretation layer.
|
||||
- Recorded the active input model as:
|
||||
- CRM `statuscode`
|
||||
- appeal type
|
||||
- specialist process (Rights of Way only)
|
||||
- Recorded that `pinswg_casestage` is not a significant active input to current status-tab lifecycle resolution.
|
||||
- Recorded that stage catalogues are best understood as:
|
||||
- user-facing journey models
|
||||
- appeal-type interpretation models
|
||||
- presentation-layer progress visualization
|
||||
- Recorded that shared catalogue families (`PLANNING_S78`, `ENFORCEMENT`, `DNS/SIP`, Rights of Way specialist-process variants) reflect a mixture of shared journey structures, presentation reuse, and historical consolidation.
|
||||
- Recorded the architectural conclusion that this area is presentation architecture / journey interpretation, not a new business-policy domain boundary candidate.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Documentation/context update only.
|
||||
- No application code changed.
|
||||
- No tests changed.
|
||||
- Lint/tests skipped because this was documentation-only work.
|
||||
|
||||
Follow-ups:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reopen only if a future business-validation or behaviour-change initiative requires deeper lifecycle/status decision work.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### CL-2026-06-18-RPA-DOCS: representation participation availability documentation + context update
|
||||
|
||||
date: 2026-06-18
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user