Merged PR 2435: Add workflow orchestration documentation validation
Add workflow orchestration documentation validation Related work items: #23754
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,6 +18,65 @@ Follow-ups:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### CL-2026-06-25-WORKFLOW-ORCHESTRATION-DOC-VALIDATION: validate whether existing architecture docs already cover PEDW workflow/orchestration
|
||||
|
||||
date: 2026-06-25
|
||||
author: Cline
|
||||
scope: `context/workflow-orchestration-documentation-validation.md`, `memory-bank/change-log.md`
|
||||
type: change
|
||||
rationale: Validate, using existing architecture documentation first, whether PEDW's workflow/orchestration model is already sufficiently documented for appeals and representations without reopening broad workflow discovery or performing route-by-route API review.
|
||||
impact: Documentation/context only; confirms current workflow/orchestration coverage across draft lifecycle, submission/finalisation, storage ownership, queue handoff, CRM transition, PDF/document generation, Notify/email side effects, completion-state handling, integration sequencing, and ownership transitions. No runtime, API, auth/session, CRM, storage, queue, notification, i18n, or behaviour change.
|
||||
status: completed
|
||||
|
||||
Summary:
|
||||
|
||||
- Confirmed the required context was read before validation:
|
||||
- `context/architecture.md`
|
||||
- `context/journey-architecture-map.md`
|
||||
- `context/api-route-map.md`
|
||||
- `context/api-grouping-workflow-boundary-assessment.md`
|
||||
- `context/api-grouping-adoption-roadmap.md`
|
||||
- `context/portal-api-platform-assessment.md`
|
||||
- `context/integration-map.md`
|
||||
- `memory-bank/change-log.md`
|
||||
- `memory-bank/open-questions.md`
|
||||
- Created new validation document:
|
||||
- `context/workflow-orchestration-documentation-validation.md`
|
||||
- Reused existing documentation as the evidence base and did not perform a new workflow discovery stream.
|
||||
- Validated the following workflow areas:
|
||||
- draft appeal lifecycle
|
||||
- appeal submission / finalisation
|
||||
- draft representation lifecycle
|
||||
- representation submission / finalisation
|
||||
- Azure Storage ownership
|
||||
- queue handoff
|
||||
- CRM transition boundary
|
||||
- PDF/document generation where relevant
|
||||
- Notify/email side effects where relevant
|
||||
- completion-state handling
|
||||
- integration sequencing
|
||||
- ownership transitions
|
||||
- Main conclusion:
|
||||
- existing PEDW architecture documents are already sufficient to describe the workflow/orchestration model at architecture level
|
||||
- strongest evidence is already present in `context/journey-architecture-map.md`, supported by `context/api-route-map.md`, `context/api-grouping-workflow-boundary-assessment.md`, `context/architecture.md`, and `context/integration-map.md`
|
||||
- the only notable gap is limited downstream detail beyond the visible queue handoff / CRM transition boundary, which does not justify another broad workflow discovery stream
|
||||
- Final recommendation recorded in the validation document:
|
||||
- **small documentation consolidation only**
|
||||
- no new workflow discovery needed at this time
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Documentation-only validation.
|
||||
- Existing documentation used as primary evidence.
|
||||
- No route inventory, broad code discovery, implementation, migration, or refactor performed.
|
||||
- Intended lightweight validation for this slice:
|
||||
- `git diff --check`
|
||||
|
||||
Follow-ups:
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer small documentation consolidation/cross-linking only if follow-up work is requested.
|
||||
- Do not open a new broad workflow/orchestration discovery stream unless a specific contradiction or missing boundary emerges.
|
||||
|
||||
### CL-2026-06-25-API-GROUPING-FACADE-SEARCH-VERTICAL-SLICE: active public search results grouping and service adoption
|
||||
|
||||
### CL-2026-06-25-API-GROUPING-WORKFLOW-BOUNDARY-ASSESSMENT: classify where the additive façade pattern should stop
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user