refactor(breadcrumbs): map step-back route branches into renderer group
This commit is contained in:
@@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ test("breadcrumbs/factory module includes expected mapped route definitions", as
|
||||
"Expected callback route renderer factory export"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes("export const createStepBackRouteRenderers ="),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
"Expected step-back route renderer factory export"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes("export const createCaseDetailRouteRenderers ="),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
@@ -114,6 +120,18 @@ test("breadcrumbs/factory module includes expected mapped route definitions", as
|
||||
"Expected /case to be mapped in createCallbackRouteRenderers"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes('"/newappeal/[appealtypes]": () => {'),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
"Expected /newappeal/[appealtypes] to be mapped in createStepBackRouteRenderers"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes('"/myportal/[appealtypes]": () => {'),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
"Expected /myportal/[appealtypes] to be mapped in createStepBackRouteRenderers"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes('"/case/[ticketnumber]": () =>'),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
@@ -203,7 +221,7 @@ test("breadcrumbs/component composes mapped routes via imported factories and sh
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
/const\s+\{[\s\S]*simpleRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*newAppealRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*callbackRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*detailAndAccountRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*\}\s*=\s*createMappedRouteRendererGroups\s*\(/.test(
|
||||
/const\s+\{[\s\S]*simpleRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*newAppealRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*callbackRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*stepBackRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*detailAndAccountRouteRenderersByPath[\s\S]*\}\s*=\s*createMappedRouteRendererGroups\s*\(/.test(
|
||||
source
|
||||
),
|
||||
true,
|
||||
@@ -290,6 +308,18 @@ test("breadcrumbs/component composes mapped routes via imported factories and sh
|
||||
"Expected /newappeal/selectappeal explicit branch to be removed after mapping"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes('isPath("/newappeal/[appealtypes]")'),
|
||||
false,
|
||||
"Expected /newappeal/[appealtypes] explicit branch to be removed after step-back mapping"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes('isPath("/myportal/[appealtypes]")'),
|
||||
false,
|
||||
"Expected /myportal/[appealtypes] explicit branch to be removed after step-back mapping"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
source.includes('isPath("/myportal/case/[ticketnumber]")'),
|
||||
false,
|
||||
@@ -372,6 +402,9 @@ test("breadcrumbs/map builder preserves route map ordering", async () => {
|
||||
const callbackOrderIndex = mapBuilderSlice.indexOf(
|
||||
"callbackRouteRenderersByPath"
|
||||
);
|
||||
const stepBackOrderIndex = mapBuilderSlice.indexOf(
|
||||
"stepBackRouteRenderersByPath"
|
||||
);
|
||||
const caseDetailOrderIndex = mapBuilderSlice.indexOf(
|
||||
"caseDetailRouteRenderersByPath"
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -385,10 +418,11 @@ test("breadcrumbs/map builder preserves route map ordering", async () => {
|
||||
simpleMyPortalOrderIndex > simpleLinkTextPairOrderIndex &&
|
||||
newAppealOrderIndex > simpleMyPortalOrderIndex &&
|
||||
callbackOrderIndex > newAppealOrderIndex &&
|
||||
caseDetailOrderIndex > callbackOrderIndex &&
|
||||
stepBackOrderIndex > callbackOrderIndex &&
|
||||
caseDetailOrderIndex > stepBackOrderIndex &&
|
||||
detailAndAccountOrderIndex > caseDetailOrderIndex,
|
||||
true,
|
||||
"Expected map builder call to preserve explicit route-map ordering (simple -> link-text -> myportal -> new-appeal -> callback -> case detail -> detail/account)"
|
||||
"Expected map builder call to preserve explicit route-map ordering (simple -> link-text -> myportal -> new-appeal -> callback -> step-back -> case detail -> detail/account)"
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user