## Summary Introduces a new `representation-policy` domain boundary and incrementally extracts low-risk representation entry policy logic while preserving existing behaviour. This PR intentionally stops before extracting ROW and Advert entry rules because characterization uncovered behavioural differences between consumers that require a separate business decision. ## What Changed Added: ```text lib/domain/representation-policy/ ``` Including: - `resolveRepresentationWindow(...)` - `isRepresentationWindowOpen(...)` - `isRepresentationWindowClosed(...)` - `canShowRepresentationButtonForAppealType(...)` - `canStartHouseholderRepresentation(...)` - `canStartCpoRepresentation(...)` Updated consumers: ```text components/case/summary/utils/representationEntry.js components/search/repsonresults.js ``` ## Extracted Behaviour ### Representation Window Calculation Centralised shared representation window logic and adopted it in both consumers. ### Appeal Type Entry Gating Centralised excluded appeal-type logic while preserving existing behaviour. ### Householder Rule Centralised Householder (`846040004`) entry rule. Preserved behaviour: ```text Householder representations can only be started by LPAs. ``` ### CPO Rule Centralised CPO (`846040019`) entry rule. Preserved behaviour using: ```text pinswg_startdate pinswg_statementduedate ``` No fallback date broadening introduced. ## Characterization Added ### ROW (`846040015`) Documented: - hearing vs non-hearing behaviour - specialist-process field behaviour - date gating - appeal-type coercion behaviour ### Advert (`846040018`) Documented: - LPA/non-LPA behaviour - specialist-process behaviour - appeal-type coercion behaviour ## Important Findings ### ROW Divergence Summary and Search consumers currently behave differently when only: ```text pinswg_speacialistcaseprocess ``` exists. ### Advert Divergence Summary and Search consumers currently use different specialist-process resolution paths. ### CRM Compatibility Both fields remain in production use and must be preserved: ```text pinswg_specialistcaseprocess pinswg_speacialistcaseprocess ``` ## Documentation Added: ```text lib/domain/representation-policy/README.md ``` Documenting: - ownership - non-goals - CRM compatibility requirements - ROW divergence - Advert divergence - future extraction constraints ## Validation Executed during the slice series: ```bash node tests/phase22/representation-window.test.cjs node tests/phase22/representation-appeal-type-entry-gating.test.cjs node tests/phase22/representation-householder-entry-rule.test.cjs node tests/phase22/representation-cpo-entry-rule.test.cjs node tests/phase22/representation-row-entry-rule.test.cjs node tests/phase22/representation-advert-entry-rule.test.cjs npm run lint ``` All passing. ## Out of Scope No changes to: - submission/finalisation - uploads - dashboards - CRM/OData queries - API routes - Redux state - translations - blocked-message rendering - CTA l...
182 lines
8.1 KiB
JavaScript
182 lines
8.1 KiB
JavaScript
import useTranslation from "next-translate/useTranslation";
|
|
import { useRouter } from "next/router";
|
|
import _ from "lodash";
|
|
import Link from "next/link";
|
|
import {
|
|
resolveRepresentationWindow,
|
|
isRepresentationWindowOpen,
|
|
isRepresentationWindowClosed,
|
|
canShowRepresentationButtonForAppealType,
|
|
canStartHouseholderRepresentation,
|
|
canStartCpoRepresentation
|
|
} from "../../lib/domain/representation-policy";
|
|
|
|
const RepsOnResults = (props) => {
|
|
let { t } = useTranslation();
|
|
|
|
const detailsObj = props.detailsObj;
|
|
const isLPA = Boolean(props?.isLPA);
|
|
const appealType = props?.appealType || detailsObj?.appealType;
|
|
const specialistProcess =
|
|
detailsObj?.pinswg_speacialistcaseprocess ||
|
|
detailsObj?.pinswg_specialistcaseprocess;
|
|
const representationWindow = resolveRepresentationWindow(detailsObj);
|
|
|
|
function showRepButton(appealType) {
|
|
if (!canShowRepresentationButtonForAppealType(appealType)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (appealType) {
|
|
case 846040004:
|
|
return canStartHouseholderRepresentation(appealType, isLPA);
|
|
|
|
case 846040015:
|
|
return specialistProcess == 846040001
|
|
? isRepresentationWindowOpen(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_startdate,
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_finalcommentsduedate
|
|
)
|
|
: true;
|
|
|
|
case 846040018:
|
|
let shouldShow =
|
|
specialistProcess == 846040000 && isLPA
|
|
? true
|
|
: specialistProcess == 846040001
|
|
? true
|
|
: false;
|
|
|
|
return shouldShow;
|
|
|
|
case 846040019:
|
|
return canStartCpoRepresentation(appealType, detailsObj);
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function formatDates(dateObj, showTime) {
|
|
var dateObj = new Date(dateObj);
|
|
var dd = String(dateObj.getDate()).padStart(2, "0");
|
|
var mm = String(dateObj.getMonth() + 1).padStart(2, "0"); //January is 0!
|
|
var yyyy = dateObj.getFullYear();
|
|
var hh = dateObj.getHours();
|
|
hh = ("0" + hh).slice(-2);
|
|
var mins = dateObj.getMinutes();
|
|
mins = ("0" + mins).slice(-2);
|
|
|
|
const dateStr = showTime
|
|
? hh == 0 && mins == 0
|
|
? ""
|
|
: hh + ":" + mins
|
|
: dd + "/" + mm + "/" + yyyy + " ";
|
|
return dateStr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return (
|
|
<>
|
|
<br />
|
|
{(_.has(detailsObj, "pinswg_startdate") ||
|
|
_.has(detailsObj, "pinswg_applicationacceptedasvalid") ||
|
|
_.has(detailsObj, "pinswg_consultationopen")) &&
|
|
((representationWindow.hasStartDate &&
|
|
representationWindow.isOpen) ||
|
|
isRepresentationWindowOpen(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_consultationopen,
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_consultationclose
|
|
)) && (
|
|
<>
|
|
{showRepButton(detailsObj.appealType) ? (
|
|
<>
|
|
{/* <Link
|
|
href={{
|
|
pathname:
|
|
"/myportal/representation",
|
|
query: {
|
|
case: detailsObj.pinswg_name,
|
|
},
|
|
}}
|
|
className="govuk-button"
|
|
>
|
|
{t(
|
|
"case:summary-make-representation-label"
|
|
)}
|
|
</Link> */}
|
|
<div className="govuk-body govuk-!-font-size-14">
|
|
{appealType == 846040002
|
|
? t(
|
|
"case:summary-consultation-open-label"
|
|
)
|
|
: t(
|
|
"case:summary-representation-open-label"
|
|
)}{" "}
|
|
</div>
|
|
</>
|
|
) : !isLPA && appealType == 846040004 ? (
|
|
""
|
|
) : (
|
|
<>
|
|
<div className="govuk-grid-column-full govuk-!-padding-left-0">
|
|
<div className="govuk-button-group">
|
|
<p className="govuk-body">
|
|
{t(
|
|
"case:representation-date-passed-label",
|
|
{
|
|
startDate: formatDates(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_startdate
|
|
),
|
|
endDate:
|
|
appealType == 846040019
|
|
? formatDates(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_statementduedate
|
|
)
|
|
: formatDates(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_finalcommentsduedate
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
)}
|
|
<br />{" "}
|
|
{t(
|
|
"case:representation-date-passed-additional-label"
|
|
)}{" "}
|
|
<Link
|
|
href={
|
|
"mailto:" +
|
|
t(
|
|
"home:login-contact-email"
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
>
|
|
{t("home:login-contact-email")}
|
|
</Link>
|
|
</p>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</>
|
|
)}
|
|
</>
|
|
)}{" "}
|
|
{_.has(detailsObj, "pinswg_startdate") &&
|
|
(detailsObj.pinswg_startdate != null ||
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_finalcommentsduedate != null) &&
|
|
isRepresentationWindowClosed(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_startdate,
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_finalcommentsduedate
|
|
) && (
|
|
<div className="govuk-body govuk-!-font-size-14">
|
|
{t("case:representation-period-ended-on-label")}
|
|
{detailsObj.appealType == 846040019
|
|
? formatDates(detailsObj.pinswg_statementduedate)
|
|
: formatDates(
|
|
detailsObj.pinswg_finalcommentsduedate
|
|
)}
|
|
</div>
|
|
)}
|
|
</>
|
|
);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export default RepsOnResults;
|