feat: add review_plan prompt builder

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-11 15:55:42 +01:00
parent 008f38e630
commit 89940c25fb
4 changed files with 428 additions and 3 deletions
+2 -1
View File
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ Phase 3 in progress.
- Task 3.1 — Zod input validation schemas (`src/tools/schemas.js`, `test/tools/schemas.test.js`) ✅
- Task 3.2 — Base prompt template (`src/prompts/base.js`, `test/prompts/base.test.js`) ✅
- Task 3.3 — ask_chatgpt prompt builder (`src/prompts/ask-chatgpt.js`, `test/prompts/ask-chatgpt.test.js`) ✅
- Task 3.4 — review_plan prompt builder (`src/prompts/review-plan.js`, `test/prompts/review-plan.test.js`) ✅
## Next Phase
Phase 3 — in progress; next is Task 3.4 (review_plan prompt builder).
Phase 3 — in progress; next is Task 3.5 (review_code prompt builder).
+20 -1
View File
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Requirements:
Status: ✅ Complete
### Task 3.4 - review_plan prompt builder (NEXT)
### Task 3.4 - review_plan prompt builder (completed)
Create `src/prompts/review-plan.js`.
@@ -209,6 +209,25 @@ Create `test/prompts/review-plan.test.js`.
Requirements:
- Mirror structure of ask-chatgpt tests: base composition, review_plan-specific instructions, optional fields, expectedOutput, input validation, tool guard, full integration.
Status: ✅ Complete
### Task 3.5 - review_code prompt builder (NEXT)
Create `src/prompts/review-code.js`.
Requirements:
- Export a `buildReviewCodePrompt(input)` function that returns a tool-specific prompt for the review_code MCP tool.
- Compose with `buildBasePrompt()` — call it internally and append the result with `---` separator.
- Instruct ChatGPT to review focused code snippets, patches, or diffs.
- Look for: correctness issues, bugs, maintainability concerns, security issues, test gaps, simpler approaches.
- Request response in structured format: Issues by Severity, Suggested Fixes, Test Suggestions.
- No other tool prompts yet (debug_issue, architecture_review, etc.).
Create `test/prompts/review-code.test.js`.
Requirements:
- Mirror structure of ask-chatgpt and review-plan tests: base composition, review_code-specific instructions, optional fields, expectedOutput, input validation, tool guard, full integration.
Status: ⬜ Pending
---
+84 -1
View File
@@ -1 +1,84 @@
// review_plan prompt template.
// Tool-specific prompt builder for review_plan.
import { buildBasePrompt } from "./base.js";
/**
* Build a tool-specific prompt for the review_plan MCP tool.
*
* @param {{ question: string, context?: string, constraints?: string[], expectedOutput?: string, projectSummary?: string, taskSummary?: string }} input
* @returns {string} A two-part prompt: base system message + review_plan user message.
*/
export function buildReviewPlanPrompt(input) {
if (!input || typeof input.question !== "string" || input.question.length === 0) {
const err = new TypeError("review_plan requires a non-empty 'question' field.");
err.kind = "ValidationError";
throw err;
}
const base = buildBasePrompt();
const lines = [
"",
"---",
"",
"You are acting as a plan reviewer for Claude Code. Claude Code will implement your suggestions — you do not implement anything yourself.",
"",
"Your task: review the proposed implementation plan and identify issues before Claude Code acts on it.",
"",
"Review the plan systematically across these dimensions:",
"- Missing requirements — steps, edge cases, or considerations the plan omits.",
"- Risks — operational, security, reliability, or deployment risks.",
"- Incorrect assumptions — any false or unverified premises in the plan.",
"- Security concerns — secrets handling, auth, authorization, injection, data exposure.",
"- Maintainability concerns — complexity, future modification cost, test gaps.",
"- Over-engineering — parts of the plan that are unnecessarily complex; suggest simpler alternatives.",
"- Task decomposition — tasks that should be split into smaller, safer steps.",
"- Pre-implementation validation — anything that should be validated before implementation begins.",
"",
"Respond in this exact structure:",
"- Summary: Brief overall assessment.",
"- Risks: Listed items with severity.",
"- Missing Requirements: Listed items.",
"- Assumptions: Incorrect or risky assumptions identified.",
"- Recommended Changes: Specific changes to the plan.",
"- Suggested Next Steps: Ordered actions for Claude Code to take.",
"",
"Important rules:",
"- Claude Code remains the implementation agent. You are acting only as a reviewer.",
"- Use only the context provided — do not assume access to the full repository.",
"- Call out uncertainty clearly — do not guess about unprovided information.",
"",
];
lines.push(`Question: ${input.question}`);
if (input.context) {
lines.push("");
lines.push(`Context: ${input.context}`);
}
if (input.constraints && input.constraints.length > 0) {
lines.push("");
lines.push("Constraints:");
for (const c of input.constraints) {
lines.push(`- ${c}`);
}
}
if (input.expectedOutput) {
lines.push("");
lines.push(`Expected output: ${input.expectedOutput}`);
}
if (input.projectSummary) {
lines.push("");
lines.push(`Project summary: ${input.projectSummary}`);
}
if (input.taskSummary) {
lines.push("");
lines.push(`Task summary: ${input.taskSummary}`);
}
return base + "\n" + lines.join("\n");
}
+322
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
import { describe, it, expect } from "vitest";
import { buildReviewPlanPrompt } from "../../src/prompts/review-plan.js";
describe("buildReviewPlanPrompt", () => {
// --- Basic output contract ---
it("returns a non-empty string given question-only input", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review this plan" });
expect(typeof result).toBe("string");
expect(result.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
it("is deterministic — same input always produces the same output", () => {
const a = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review this plan" });
const b = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review this plan" });
expect(a).toBe(b);
});
// --- Composition with base prompt ---
it("includes the base system prompt content", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("second-opinion assistant");
expect(result).toContain("Claude Code");
expect(result).toContain("not responsible for editing files");
});
it("contains a '---' separator between base and tool-specific sections", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
const parts = result.split("\n---\n");
expect(parts.length).toBe(2);
});
// --- review_plan-specific role instructions ---
it("contains review_plan-specific role instruction (plan reviewer)", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("plan reviewer");
});
it("instructs Claude Code as the implementation agent", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("Claude Code will implement your suggestions");
});
it("instructs ChatGPT that you do not implement anything yourself", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("you do not implement anything yourself");
});
// --- Review dimensions ---
it("includes missing requirements dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("missing requirements");
});
it("includes risks dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("risks");
});
it("includes incorrect assumptions dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("incorrect assumptions");
});
it("includes security concerns dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("security concerns");
});
it("includes maintainability concerns dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("maintainability concerns");
});
it("includes over-engineering dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("over-engineering");
});
it("includes task decomposition dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("task decomposition");
});
it("includes pre-implementation validation dimension", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("pre-implementation validation");
});
// --- Expected response structure ---
it("requests Summary section in response structure", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/summary/i);
});
it("requests Risks section in response structure", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/risks/i);
});
it("requests Missing Requirements section in response structure", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/missing requirements/i);
});
it("requests Assumptions section in response structure", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/assumptions/i);
});
it("requests Recommended Changes section in response structure", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/recommended changes/i);
});
it("requests Suggested Next Steps section in response structure", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/suggested next steps/i);
});
// --- Claude Code / reviewer guard rails ---
it("states Claude Code remains the implementation agent", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("Claude Code remains the implementation agent");
});
it("states ChatGPT is acting only as a reviewer", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("acting only as a reviewer");
});
it("instructs to use only the context provided", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toContain("only the context provided");
});
it("instructs not to assume access to the full repository", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).toMatch(/do not assume access to the full repository/i);
});
// --- Question field ---
it("appends the input question verbatim in the task section", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review JWT migration plan" });
expect(result).toContain("Question: Review JWT migration plan");
});
// --- Optional fields appended correctly (with question) ---
it("appends Context when context is provided", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({
question: "Review this plan",
context: "We use EC2 user data for secrets.",
});
expect(result).toContain("Context: We use EC2 user data for secrets.");
});
it("does NOT append Context section when context is empty", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review this plan", context: "" });
expect(result).not.toContain("Context:");
});
it("appends Constraints list when constraints are provided", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({
question: "Review this plan",
constraints: ["must be safe", "must not add infra changes"],
});
expect(result).toContain("Constraints:");
expect(result).toContain("- must be safe");
expect(result).toContain("- must not add infra changes");
});
it("does NOT append Constraints section when constraints array is empty", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review this plan", constraints: [] });
expect(result).not.toContain("Constraints:");
});
it("appends Expected output when expectedOutput is provided", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({
question: "Review migration plan",
expectedOutput: "A structured review covering risks and missing requirements.",
});
expect(result).toContain("Expected output: A structured review covering risks and missing requirements.");
});
it("does NOT append Expected output section when expectedOutput is omitted", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Review migration plan" });
expect(result).not.toContain("Expected output:");
});
it("does NOT append Expected output section when expectedOutput is empty", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test", expectedOutput: "" });
expect(result).not.toContain("Expected output:");
});
it("appends all optional fields alongside each other", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({
question: "Review auth migration plan",
context: "Current system uses session cookies.",
constraints: ["no infra changes", "must support existing IAM"],
expectedOutput: "A checklist-style review.",
projectSummary: "Internal inventory management system.",
taskSummary: "Migrating from sessions to JWT.",
});
expect(result).toContain("Question: Review auth migration plan");
expect(result).toContain("Context: Current system uses session cookies.");
expect(result).toContain("Constraints:");
expect(result).toContain("- no infra changes");
expect(result).toContain("- must support existing IAM");
expect(result).toContain("Expected output: A checklist-style review.");
expect(result).toContain("Project summary: Internal inventory management system.");
expect(result).toContain("Task summary: Migrating from sessions to JWT.");
});
it("does NOT append Project summary when projectSummary is omitted", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).not.toContain("Project summary:");
});
it("does NOT append Task summary when taskSummary is omitted", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).not.toContain("Task summary:");
});
// --- Tool-specific guard ---
it("does NOT contain ask_chatgpt specific content", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("answer the question directly");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("second-opinion advisor");
});
it("does NOT contain review_code specific content", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).not.toContain("review_code");
expect(result).not.toContain("patch");
expect(result).not.toContain("diff");
});
it("does NOT contain debug_issue specific content", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "Test" });
expect(result).not.toContain("debug_issue");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("stack trace");
});
// --- Input validation ---
it("throws TypeError when input is missing", () => {
expect(() => buildReviewPlanPrompt()).toThrow(TypeError);
expect(() => buildReviewPlanPrompt(null)).toThrow(TypeError);
});
it("throws TypeError when question is missing", () => {
expect(() => buildReviewPlanPrompt({ context: "something" })).toThrow(TypeError);
});
it("throws TypeError when question is empty", () => {
expect(() => buildReviewPlanPrompt({ question: "" })).toThrow(TypeError);
});
// --- Full integration test ---
it("returns a well-formed two-part prompt with all fields", () => {
const result = buildReviewPlanPrompt({
question: "Review JWT migration plan",
context: "We use session cookies and EC2 user data for secrets.",
constraints: ["no infra changes", "must support existing IAM"],
expectedOutput: "A checklist-style review with severity ratings.",
projectSummary: "Internal inventory management system with multi-tenant isolation.",
taskSummary: "Migrating from session-based auth to JWT.",
});
// Base section present
expect(result).toContain("second-opinion assistant");
expect(result).toContain("Rules:");
// Separator
expect(result).toMatch(/\n---\n/);
// Tool-specific section present
expect(result).toContain("plan reviewer");
expect(result).toContain("Claude Code remains the implementation agent");
expect(result).toMatch(/do not assume access to the full repository/i);
// All 8 review dimensions present
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("missing requirements");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("risks");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("incorrect assumptions");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("security concerns");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("maintainability concerns");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("over-engineering");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("task decomposition");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).toContain("pre-implementation validation");
// Expected response structure present
expect(result).toMatch(/summary/i);
expect(result).toMatch(/risks/i);
expect(result).toMatch(/missing requirements/i);
expect(result).toMatch(/assumptions/i);
expect(result).toMatch(/recommended changes/i);
expect(result).toMatch(/suggested next steps/i);
// All fields present verbatim
expect(result).toContain("Question: Review JWT migration plan");
expect(result).toContain("Context: We use session cookies and EC2 user data for secrets.");
expect(result).toContain("- no infra changes");
expect(result).toContain("- must support existing IAM");
expect(result).toContain("Expected output: A checklist-style review with severity ratings.");
expect(result).toContain("Project summary: Internal inventory management system with multi-tenant isolation.");
expect(result).toContain("Task summary: Migrating from session-based auth to JWT.");
// Does not contain other tool content
expect(result.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("answer the question directly");
expect(result.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("second-opinion advisor");
});
});