docs: record bare whether proposition fix
This commit is contained in:
@@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ Experiment 54N tested whether an interpretation disagreement can be judged for m
|
||||
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (39/39)
|
||||
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.29 `Uncertainty over whether...` customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path on this branch.
|
||||
|
||||
### 60B.33 explicit bare `whether` proposition fix
|
||||
|
||||
- 60B.32 diagnosed that proposition extraction for a bare `Whether...` description still depended on label keywords like `status|likelihood|risk|uncertainty`, causing nominal labels such as `Enterprise customer signing decision` to lose their explicit proposition.
|
||||
- `extractMeaning()` now treats a description beginning with bare `Whether...` as sufficient evidence of an unresolved proposition regardless of label wording, while preserving the existing bounded rationale stripping.
|
||||
- Focused deterministic verification passed:
|
||||
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (42/42)
|
||||
- Generic non-proposition decision unknowns remain on their existing path when no explicit `Whether...` proposition is present.
|
||||
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.31 live-shaped customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path on this branch.
|
||||
|
||||
### When This Knowledge-Management Phase Is Complete
|
||||
|
||||
Provisional criteria for review (all confirmed met by Experiment 38 cold-start test):
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user