docs: record bare whether proposition fix

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-14 07:01:23 +01:00
parent 437aadc587
commit 2996c30578
2 changed files with 132 additions and 0 deletions
+9
View File
@@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ Experiment 54N tested whether an interpretation disagreement can be judged for m
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (39/39)
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.29 `Uncertainty over whether...` customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path on this branch.
### 60B.33 explicit bare `whether` proposition fix
- 60B.32 diagnosed that proposition extraction for a bare `Whether...` description still depended on label keywords like `status|likelihood|risk|uncertainty`, causing nominal labels such as `Enterprise customer signing decision` to lose their explicit proposition.
- `extractMeaning()` now treats a description beginning with bare `Whether...` as sufficient evidence of an unresolved proposition regardless of label wording, while preserving the existing bounded rationale stripping.
- Focused deterministic verification passed:
- `npx vitest run tests/graph/question-formulator.test.js` → PASS (42/42)
- Generic non-proposition decision unknowns remain on their existing path when no explicit `Whether...` proposition is present.
- **Still unproven live:** the exact 60B.31 live-shaped customer-signing case through the full end-to-end runtime path on this branch.
### When This Knowledge-Management Phase Is Complete
Provisional criteria for review (all confirmed met by Experiment 38 cold-start test):