test(experiment): checkpoint three-turn separated reasoning result

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-19 09:51:31 +01:00
parent 98889039c2
commit 6ed3415220
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
{
"apparatus": "rto-three-turn-separated-reasoning.mjs",
"experiment": "RTO.17A",
"artifactType": "LIVE RESULT — RTO.17A three-turn separated layers invocation",
"modelName": "qwen-claude:latest",
"elapsedMs": 49658,
"promptLength": 8153,
"inputCharacterCount": 8153,
"priorArtifactUsed": "rto-layer-separated-live.json (RTO.16)",
"priorFocusedUnderstandingLoaded": true,
"priorDecisionSignificanceLoaded": true,
"centralCaseStatementSupplied": true,
"turnHistorySupplied": false,
"layerStructure": {
"focusedUnderstanding": "object",
"decisionSignificance": "array"
},
"structuredResult": {
"focusedUnderstanding": {
"targetNodeId": "nxmeiab",
"observations": [
"One competitor has recruited machine-learning engineers and a senior product manager for this market segment.",
"The same competitor presented at an industry conference featuring a technical architecture diagram, prototype workflow, and discussion of model-training challenges that closely match our target customer problem.",
"The presentation content aligns more closely with active product development than general market education, though no commercial product name or launch date was disclosed.",
"The product retains protected intellectual property, proprietary processes, and software algorithms currently unavailable to competitors."
],
"uncertainties": [
"Whether the observed prototype's technical approach aligns with or effectively circumvents existing patent claims and algorithmic barriers.",
"The development timeline and release readiness of the detected competitor relative to a twelve-month decision window.",
"The level of parallel development activity among other competitors beyond the single observed entity.",
"Whether the competing prototype or intended offering targets the same enterprise customer segment as our current focus."
],
"assumptions": [
"Existing IP portfolio continues to serve as an effective barrier to rapid replication by competitors.",
"Competitors face non-trivial costs or technical hurdles in bypassing proprietary algorithms and processes.",
"The detected competitor possesses sufficient resources to sustain active development in response to the target customer problem."
],
"relationships": [
{
"from": "Conference Content (Architecture/Prototype)",
"to": "Active Development Indication",
"type": "Stronger Support"
},
{
"from": "Patents & Proprietary Algorithms",
"to": "Competitor Replication Difficulty",
"type": "Restricts"
},
{
"from": "Hiring & Conference Activity",
"to": "Potential Competing Development",
"type": "Suggests"
},
{
"from": "Unverified Signals",
"to": "Release Timeline Estimation",
"type": "Obscures"
}
],
"possibleFollowUpQuestions": [
"Can the specific claims covered by our patent portfolio be mapped against the technical architecture discussed in the presentation to identify potential work-around attempts?",
"Are there additional industry signals (e.g., customer pilot announcements, vendor listings, or niche hiring platforms) confirming the competitor's product trajectory or target market alignment?"
]
},
"decisionSignificance": [
{
"insight": "The confirmation of active development indicators narrows the strategic advantage of launching this year, as competitors may reach the market within our current wait window."
},
{
"insight": "Uncertainty around patent circumvention directly impacts whether deferring £300,000 in implementation costs will inadvertently cede first-mover territory if the competitor's technical hurdles prove surmountable."
},
{
"insight": "Clarifying the competitor's target customer alignment is critical to assessing the risk of immediate revenue stability erosion versus the benefit of delayed launch and product improvement."
}
]
}
}