fix: normalise reported claim evidence kind

lib/reconstruction/compatibility.js

@@ -16,6 +16,18 @@ export function normaliseAnalysisResponse(input) {
     normalised.evidence = normalised.evidence.map((record, index) => {
       if (!record || typeof record !== "object") return record;
 
+      if (record.evidenceType === "reported_claim") {
+        changesApplied.push({
+          path: ["evidence", index, "evidenceType"],
+          change: "Converted reported_claim to reported_statement",
+        });
+
+        record = {
+          ...record,
+          evidenceType: "reported_statement",
+        };
+      }
+
       if (record.source === null) {
         changesApplied.push({
           path: ["evidence", index, "source"],

tests/reconstruction/compatibility.test.js

@@ -71,6 +71,33 @@ describe("normaliseAnalysisResponse", () => {
     expect(result.changesApplied).toHaveLength(1);
   });
 
+  it("normalises reported_claim evidenceType to reported_statement", () => {
+    const input = {
+      evidence: [
+        {
+          id: "ev1",
+          description: "x",
+          evidenceType: "reported_claim",
+          confidence: "medium",
+          importance: "important",
+          source: "report",
+        },
+      ],
+    };
+
+    const result = normaliseAnalysisResponse(input);
+
+    expect(result.normalised.evidence[0].evidenceType).toBe(
+      "reported_statement",
+    );
+    expect(result.changesApplied).toEqual([
+      {
+        path: ["evidence", 0, "evidenceType"],
+        change: "Converted reported_claim to reported_statement",
+      },
+    ]);
+  });
+
   it("does not invent a next question", () => {
     const input = { evidence: [] };
     const result = normaliseAnalysisResponse(input);
@@ -165,6 +192,62 @@ describe("analyseScenario compatibility", () => {
     expect(result.nextQuestion).toBeUndefined();
   });
 
+  it("succeeds when reported_claim is the only evidenceType mismatch", async () => {
+    mockGenerateReconstruction.mockResolvedValue({
+      inputClassification: {
+        primaryType: "unexplained_change",
+        secondaryTypes: [],
+        reasoningModes: ["validate_measurement"],
+        classificationReason: "reason",
+        confidence: "medium",
+      },
+      reconstruction: {
+        summary: "summary",
+        actors: [],
+        systemsOrObjects: [],
+        expectedStates: [],
+        observedStates: [],
+        differences: [],
+        knownTransitions: [],
+        unexplainedTransitions: [],
+        contradictions: [],
+        importantUnknowns: [],
+        plausibleInterpretations: [],
+      },
+      evidence: [
+        {
+          id: "ev1",
+          description: "desc",
+          evidenceType: "reported_claim",
+          attribution: null,
+          confidence: "medium",
+          importance: "important",
+        },
+      ],
+      nextQuestion: {
+        id: "q1",
+        question: "What denominator?",
+        targets: ["observedStates"],
+        reason: "reason",
+        expectedInformationValue: "high",
+        reasoningMode: "validate_measurement",
+      },
+    });
+
+    const { analyseScenario } = await import("@/lib/analysis.js");
+    const result = await analyseScenario("Scenario text", {
+      promptVersion: "v0.3",
+    });
+
+    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
+    expect(result.compatibilityApplied).toBe(true);
+    expect(result.compatibilityChanges).toContainEqual({
+      path: ["evidence", 0, "evidenceType"],
+      change: "Converted reported_claim to reported_statement",
+    });
+    expect(result.evidence[0].evidenceType).toBe("reported_statement");
+  });
+
   it("malformed JSON still fails", async () => {
     mockGenerateReconstruction.mockResolvedValue("{not valid json");