16 KiB
Current Handoff — Confidence Engine
Role: Concise operational snapshot for resuming work today. Not a historical diary. The design evolution archive index at
docs/design-evolution/README.mdprovides progressive loading of experiment history; load the relevant chapter only when a specific historical question requires it.
CURRENT MVP DIRECTION
Initial-decomposition hardening is frozen for the current MVP stage.
Authenticated product boundary (v0.62a)
- Confidence Engine uses self-hosted Supabase Auth with magic-link email,
/auth/callbackcode exchange, cookie-backed sessions, and protected product routes/API requests; unauthenticated API requests receive 401. - Investigation persistence remains wholly localStorage-backed and independent of authentication. No
confidence_enginedatabase schema, tables, snapshot ownership fields, Supabase server configuration, or PostgREST configuration were changed; server persistence remains future work.
Database foundation (v0.62b)
- Version-controlled migration defines
confidence_engine.investigations: the existing CE UUID is the row ID, platform ownership isuser_id, and the opaque CE snapshot is JSONB. RLS permits authenticated users only whereuser_id = auth.uid(); timestamps include automaticupdated_atmaintenance. - The migration has not been applied to the self-hosted Supabase environment. Application persistence remains localStorage-backed; the external infrastructure step is to apply the migration and add
confidence_engineto PostgREST's exposed schemas before server persistence is wired.
Current product checkpoint: Read docs/confidence-engine-product-checkpoint-2026-09-08.md before planning new product, live-evidence, or commercial work. The core investigation loop is now sufficiently established to prioritise realistic end-to-end use, report experience, prospective-user value, repeat use, and willingness to pay—not endless isolated reasoning-mechanics experiments. Preserve user ownership and address trust-critical defects when found.
Do not resume:
- repeated-same-input reconstruction experiments
- Qwen/Terra reconstruction comparison
- initial prompt refinement
- supplier/weekend-shift decomposition experiments
- relationship-preservation experiments
- causal-fidelity experiments
unless new end-to-end user-flow evidence reopens one of those boundaries.
Immediate strategic evidence question:
Does the complete investigation process leave real people materially clearer about genuinely difficult situations, repeatedly enough that they will pay to use it? Use measured realistic scenarios and bounded live action budgets; the September 8 checkpoint records the current Terra cost/latency evidence.
Server-owned UI journey provider experiment
- Server-only
CONFIDENCE_ENGINE_EXPERIMENT_PROVIDER=openaicentrally resolves the existing OpenAI provider andgpt-5.6-terra; without it, normal production resolution remains Ollama/Qwen. An OpenAI key alone does not switch providers. - Browser request contracts and client state remain unchanged. Deterministic coverage includes initial start, normal update, episode reconsideration, focused deconstruction, overview synthesis, and Current Understanding synthesis.
- Zero live calls occurred. Next boundary: one real Playwright-driven Terra investigation measuring user-visible latency, actual LLM-call sequence, and OpenAI usage/cost.
OpenAI alternate structured output
- The OpenAI provider now honors a caller-supplied structured-output schema, applying its existing strict-schema transport projection; absent an alternate schema, initial reconstruction retains its existing strict schema and transport normalization.
- The next live run exposed incomplete recursive strict projection: OpenAI rejected
relationships.itemsbecause it lackedadditionalProperties: false. The projector now recognizes everytype: "object"node, including property-less objects in array items, and recursively enforces strict object schemas while preserving initial-reconstruction optionality/nullability behavior. - The latest Terra request then exposed an inconsistent root
properties/requiredcontract. The projector now derivesrequiredafter projection from the surviving property keys, and recursive tests verifyproperties,required, andadditionalPropertiesconsistency. Property-less object strictness and initial-reconstruction transport behavior remain preserved. - Current deterministic final-fetch schema remains internally valid, yet the live rejection contradicts it.
CONFIDENCE_ENGINE_EXPERIMENT_TRACE_OPENAI_SCHEMA=1now emits one safe, server-side structural summary immediately before the OpenAI fetch—no prompt, answer, request body, secret, or model output. - The focused-deconstruction route now emits complementary safe server diagnostics for start, provider success/failure, focused validation, and end status; the OpenAI schema trace remains provider-owned. No user content or secrets are logged.
- Canonical focused relationship items are now strict
{ from, to, type }: all required non-empty strings, free-texttype, and norationale;relationshipsremains required and may be[]. Schema, prompt field names, and validator align; the stale rationale-bearing test fixture was corrected. - Live Terra focused deconstruction now passes through the real UI, but the following Current Understanding synthesis exposed a separate caller/schema mismatch: its prompt and validator require
{ currentUnderstanding }while the provider received the default initial-reconstruction schema. - Terra synthesis now supplies its own output schema and unwraps
providerResult.responsebefore validation; deterministic synthesis coverage is 62/62 PASS and the saved isolated Terra synthesis POST returned HTTP 200. - Real Terra completed-episode reconsideration can legitimately return no additional meaningful graph change. Completed episodes now tolerate only that exact compatibility outcome; ordinary no-op updates and invalid completed-episode proposals remain rejected, without fake graph mutation or new next-question steering.
- The full apply-proposal owner suite remains known-red in independent pre-existing 60B.43 tests, so the changed Done-for-now boundary was verified through exact isolated owner tests. Zero live calls occurred during closeout. Next boundary: reuse the existing investigation and click Done for now once, observing cases/update and subsequent synthesis.
- Live UI proved Done for now briefly clarified the question, then server graph replacement reopened it: the client sends
preDoneGraph, and the server previously had no deterministic closure owner. Episode-mode update now adds the selectedtargetNodeIdtoresolvedNodeIdsonly after successful semantic application; semantic no-ops and meaningful mutations remain valid, while failed episodes do not resolve the target and ordinary updates are unchanged. Zero live calls occurred during implementation. Next boundary: one live Done-for-now check on the existing investigation.
Repository checkpoint
- Branch:
feature/initial-decomposition-v0.61 - HEAD:
5878ce4— experiment(confidence-engine): add reconstruction-only helper flag - Working tree: clean after this session's commit
Initial reconstruction — current status
Semantically stable enough for current MVP stage. Exact graph topology is not stable and is not treated as an invariant. Trust-critical meaning must remain stable. Some compression is acceptable when meaning survives downstream. Missing meaning cannot be faithfully recovered downstream. Causal hypotheses must remain visibly provisional.
Current production default: reconstruct-v0.5 prompt + canonical reconstruction schema + Zod validation via z.toJSONSchema().
The /api/cases/start route returns validated initial reconstruction, situation graph, and selected question. Observability seam exposes the exact object used by buildInitialGraph() for comparison.
Frozen: initial decomposition, prompt refinement, Qwen/Terra comparison — see CURRENT MVP DIRECTION above.
Focused investigation — current status
Focused deconstruction plumbing fixes are complete:
- Schema mismatch resolved (focused route now supplies its own
focusedDeconstructJsonSchema) - Provider envelope no longer leaks into validator (inner
.responseunwrapped correctly) - All 48 focused-investigation-boundary tests pass on first run
Focused deconstruction receives only:
centralStatementtargetLabeltargetDescriptionquestionanswer
Full SituationGraph / original scenario / previous findings are not supplied to that route. This is intentional epistemic separation.
Repeatability: supplier/weekend-shift epistemic separation repeated 3/3 on the fixed case after plumbing fix. Previous pre-fix semantic runs remain invalid (contaminated by provider-envelope misuse + wrong transport schema).
Canonical experiment apparatus — currently valid
scripts/start-case-experiment-helper.cjs — canonical helper (tsx runtime)
tsx runtime — alias-capable experiment execution
--file — file-input mode (JSON fixture)
--reconstruction-only — stop after initial reconstruction, no question generation
import-only proof — prove startCase() import chain resolves without live calls
OpenAI reconstruction experiment seam — START_CASE_EXPERIMENT_PROVIDER=openai (experiment-only)
focused-deconstruction schema fix — plumbing verified, 48/48 tests pass
No other experimental apparatus is currently valid. Obsolete setups have been removed or superseded.
Current product architecture
Three distinct routes:
/ → Portfolio (notebook index)
/investigations/{id} → Investigation (working case/pages)
/investigations/{id}/report → Investigation Report (derived summary)
Portfolio: investigation collection with actions per card (View report, Continue investigation, Restart). "+ Create new investigation" allocates durable ID via crypto.randomUUID() + navigates.
Investigation: ScenarioForm + ReasoningWorkspace. Handles focused turns, Done/Re-open semantics, Current Understanding synthesis.
Report: rendered persisted investigationReport snapshot. On-demand generation (one /api/cases/overview on first visit; zero on subsequent). Not canonical reasoning evidence — derived artefact.
Evidence discipline invariants
RAW USER EVIDENCE
≠ MODEL-DERIVED CONTRIBUTION SEMANTICS
≠ CURRENT CANONICAL FINDING
≠ IMMUTABLE SOURCE OBSERVATION
≠ USER DISPOSITION / AUTHORITY
≠ TURN CONTEXT / PROVENANCE
Finding dispositions: null (eligible working premise), agree (user-endorsed), not_relevant (excluded from eligible reasoning, provenance retained). User disposition never directly mutates authoritative graph state.
Persistence
- Owner:
lib/storage/providers/local-storage.js(saveInvestigation/loadInvestigation) - Key prefix:
confidence-engine-investigation:<durable-id> - Storage contract:
lib/storage/investigation-storage.js(application-facing boundary) - Identity: durable
idallocated by application, not storage - First persistence: when user produces meaningful state (scenario submitted), not on create-click
- Restart: preserves container/id/scenario; clears reasoning/report state
MVP boundaries
Implemented:
- Multi-investigation via localStorage with durable IDs
- Report freshness (
Current/Update available) derived from revision comparison - Manual
Update reportaction - Confirmation-gated restart
- No automatic regeneration
- Duplicate prevention guard
Deferred beyond MVP:
- Search, tag, archive, group within Portfolio
- Export/copy Reports to external document
- Report history / comparison
- Multi-provider production routing (OpenAI/Terra comparison is frozen)
Current development constraints
- Canonical dev server at
http://localhost:3000. Never start/stop/restart/probe it. If unavailable → BLOCKED and stop. - Playwright MCP: use Run Playwright code with semantic locators. Snapshot refs are observational only.
- For async/hydration states: use
waitFor({ state: 'visible', timeout })— not arbitrary sleeps. - If a prescribed semantic locator cannot find its control → STOP. No fallback to CSS/XPath/DOM traversal.
- Live freeze: once Playwright verification begins, no production file edits until evidence is captured.
- Tests are instruments, not product truth. At first deterministic failure: classify PRODUCT vs APPARATUS, then stop.
- A failed prescribed UI step is evidence, not permission to explore: semantic
page.getByRole(...)locators only; do not substitute actions, retry model-backed steps, or navigate away from a manually positioned persisted state. Define action budgets for live cost experiments.
Current genuinely open boundaries
Not yet implemented:
- Multi-investigation portfolio (search/tag/archive/group)
- Export/copy of Reports to external document
- Production multi-provider routing (Ollama/Qwen default remains)
Known limitations:
- Current Understanding and Investigation Report are architecturally distinct artefacts. Report interpretations remain explicit, not evidence.
- The
≤5processing bound was experimental apparatus constraint, NOT product requirement.
HISTORICAL — initial-decomposition v0.61 status
Initial decomposition experiments (v0.61) ran four successful runs plus one validation failure against the same manufacturing scenario. Key findings:
- Consistently preserved across all runs: normalisation uncertainty, CRM comparability, supplier/shift ambiguity
- Variable: late-delivery vs defect distinction (1 PRESENT, 3 PARTIAL)
- Rarely surfaced: intervention-fit uncertainty (1 PRESENT, 3 ABSENT)
- Run 2 introduced speculative subdivisions not grounded in source text
- No steering language, unsupported causality, or action recommendations in any run
- Graph topology varies materially (14–21 nodes) across runs — this is expected, not a defect
Qwen/Terra matched evidence showed Terra with stronger stability on C and D1/D2 distinctions; Qwen preserved meaning but compressed more frequently. Both providers vary graph topology while preserving core dependencies.
These results are documented as historical experiment evidence. The v0.61 line is frozen — see CURRENT MVP DIRECTION above.
Provenance pointers
| Need | Read |
|---|---|
| Product evolution v0.51–v0.60 | docs/design-evolution/README.md (progressive loading) |
| Methodology / RTO axioms | docs/current-working-principles.md §0 (A1–A12) |
| Architecture guardrails | .claude/architecture-guardrails.md |
| Task routing by work type | docs/task-context-packs.md |
| September 8 product/economics checkpoint | docs/confidence-engine-product-checkpoint-2026-09-08.md |
| Full experiment history (specific) | docs/design-evolution/README.md → relevant chapter |
Consult docs/current-project-state.md for broader project context and passive classifier status.
Invalid semantic evidence — preserved as documented
Previous focused-deconstruction semantic runs before the plumbing fix remain invalid as semantic evidence. They produced all-zero semantic fields because:
- Provider envelope buried semantic fields under wrapper (not
.response) - Initial-reconstruction schema was supplied to focused-deconstruction call instead of its own contract
These are recorded as known contamination in the v0.61 archive chapter (docs/design-evolution/ch19/initial-decomposition-v0.61.md). The plumbing fix is complete and verified (48/48 tests).